Green infrastructure development opportunities in rural settlements

Authors

  • István Valánszki Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation
  • Debóra Virág Lechner Knowledge Center Non-profit ltd.
  • István Balázs Kiszter Urban Management Services Nonprofit Ltd., Szentendre
  • Zsombor Boromisza Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/60.3

Keywords:

Green infrastructure, Rural development, Hungarian countryside

Abstract

The term of green infrastructure (GI) became widespread all over the world especially in relation to settlement planning. Because of the complexity and multifunctionality of the concept it can be applied in regional and rural development as well. The European Union intends to integrate the concept of green infrastructure into several policy fields, strategies. In Hungary during the last years, many important GI related strategies have been elaborated. However, the already existing complex projects and case studies mainly focusing on cities or bigger towns, settlements. In our study, we would like to give an example of a complex GI planning and development in a case of a smaller settlement on the Hungarian countryside. Following the local government’s and stakeholders’ needs our goal was to give a practice-oriented proposal for GI development for the settlement implementing many suggestions from the formerly mentioned research reports and handbooks. We dealt with a typical rural settlement, called Kisszállás from the Great Hungarian Plain as case study. Our analyses focused on GI of the unbuilt and built-up areas of the settlement as well as the border zones between these two parts of the settlement. Our results showed many shortcomings related to the GI, however, we found also several untapped potentials. Based on these results, we developed the GI concept of Kisszállás. We targeted two main directions: 1, the professional maintenance, protection of existing GI system; 2, elaboration of conceptual development ideas focusing on two target areas. With these targets a significant improvement can be achieved in the green areas of the settlement. Our practice-oriented proposal-package represents an example how it is possible to implement the international and national policies, recommendations into local actions.

Author Biographies

  • István Valánszki , Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

    associate professor
    Email: valanszki.istvan@uni-mate.hu

  • Debóra Virág, Lechner Knowledge Center Non-profit ltd.

    regional planning consultant
    Email: viragdebi@gmail.com

  • István Balázs Kiszter , Urban Management Services Nonprofit Ltd., Szentendre

    park maintenance coordinator
    Email: kiszter.istvan@szentendre.hu

  • Zsombor Boromisza, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

    associate professor
    Email: Boromisza.Zsombor@uni-mate.hu

References

Valánszki, István és Virág, Debóra és Kiszter, István Balázs és Boromisza, Zsombor (2021) Green infrastructure development opportunities in rural settlements = Zöldinfrastruktúra fejlesztési lehetőségek vidéki településeken. 4D TÁJÉPÍTÉSZETI ÉS KERTMŰVÉSZETI FOLYÓIRAT (60). pp. 34-49. ISSN 1787-6613

Literatures

VALÁNSZKI I. – DANCSOKNÉ FÓRIS E. – FILEPNÉ KOVÁCS, K. (2018): Parallel Development of Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Tourism – Case Studies from Hungary. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences. 33(4) 625-647.

ELY M. – PITMAN S. (2014): Green infrastructure; Life support for human habitats. Botanic Gardens of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide, Australia

BENEDICT M.A. – MCMAHON E.T. (2001): Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse, Monograph Series, Washington D.C.

CIVIC K. – SIUTA M. (2014): Green infrastructure. Training manual for trainers. [online] Budapest: ECNC, Tilburg, the Netherlands and CEEweb for Biodiversity. In: Europarc Federation honlapja, URL: http://www.ecnc.org/uploads/2015/10/GI_Training_ Manual_Final.pdf, [2018.09.02.] Copyright © 2014 ECNC and CEEweb,

https://www.europarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Training_Manual_v3-Copy.pdf

BÁTHORYNÉ NAGY I. R. – DANCSÓKNÉ FÓRIS E. – JOMBACH S. et al. (2020): Zöldinfrastruktúra-hálózat fejlesztése - A hazai zöldinfrastruktúra megőrzését és fejlesztését megalapozó stratégiai keretek meghatározása: Módszertani javaslat a zöldinfrastruktúra belterületi elemeinek azonosítására, állapotértékelésére és annak mintaterületi alkalmazására. Ormos Imre Alapítvány, Megbízó: Agrárminisztérium [kutatási jelentés]

European Commission (2013): Green Infrastructure (GI) — Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. [online] Brussels: European Union. URL: http://eurlex. europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:d41348f2-01d5-4abe-b817- 4c73e6f1b2df.0014.03/DOC_1&format=PDF [2018.09.02.]

EEA (2011): Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. EEA Technical report. (18) 1-142. URL: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/green-infrastructure-and-territorial-cohesion

VARGÁNÉ CSOBÁN K. (2010): A fenntartható turizmus vidékfejlesztési összefüggései az Észak-Alföldi régió példáján. [PhD értekezés]. Debreceni Egyetem, Agrár- és Gazdálkodástudományok Centruma, Gazdaságelméleti Intézet Ihrig Károly Gazdálkodás – és Szervezéstudományok Doktori Iskola, Debrecen. URL: https://dea.lib.unideb.hu/

VASVARI M. – BODA J. – DÁVID L. – BUJDOSÓ Z. (2015): Water-based tourism as reflected in visitors to Hungary’s Lakes. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 15(1) 91–103

FILEPNÉ KOVÁCS K. – EGYED A. (2011): Az élőhelyek rehabilitációja és a zöldúttervezés kapcsolata a Hanságban. Tájökológiai Lapok. 9(1) 73–85.

FLINK, A. C. – SEARNS, M. R. (1993): Greenways: a Guide to planning, design and development. The Conservation Fund. Island Press: Washington D. C.

East Coast Greenway Alliance (2019): Greenway Criteria and Design Guide. East Coast Greenway Alliance: Durham. URL: https://www.greenway.org/

European Commission (2011): COM/2011/0244 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions our Life Insurance, our Natural Capital: An Eu Biodiversity Strategy To 2020 Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An Eu Biodiversity Strategy To 2020 Brussels, European Union, [online] In: EUR-lex oldalon. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/. [2018.08.28]

European Commission (2011): COM/2011/0571 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. Brussels, European Union, [online] In: EUR-lex oldalon. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ [2018.09.20.]

European Commission (2011): COM/2011/0612 final. Proposal on specific provisions concerning the European Regional Development Fund and the Investment for growth and jobs goal; Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Cohesion Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006. Brussels, European Union, [online] In: EUR-lex oldalon. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ [2018.08.25.]

European Commission (2010): COM (2010) 672: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions the CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future. Brussels, European Union, [online] In: EUR-lex oldalon. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ [2018.08.28.]

European Commission (2013): COM (2013) 659 final. A new EU Forest Strategy: for forests and the forest-based sector Brussels, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, European Union, [online] In: EUR-lex oldalon. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ [2018.08.28.]

European Commission (2020): COM/2020/380 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Eu Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives. Brussels, European Union, [online] In: EUR-lex oldalon. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ [2018.08.28.]

KOLLÁNYI L. – BÁTHORYNÉ NAGY I. R. – DANCSÓKNÉ FÓRIS E. et al. (2020): Zöldinfrastruktúra-hálózat fejlesztése - A hazai zöldinfrastruktúra megőrzését és fejlesztését megalapozó stratégiai keretek meghatározása: Módszertani javaslat a zöldinfrastruktúra belterületi elemeinek azonosítására, állapotértékelésére és annak mintaterületi alkalmazására. Ormos Imre Alapítvány, Megbízó: Agrárminisztérium [kutatási jelentés]

SZILBERHORN E. (ed) (2017): Kisszállás Településképi Arculati Kézikönyve. Kisszállás: Község Önkormányzata [online] In: Kisszállás honlapja. URL: https://kisszallas.hu/ [2018.08.28.]

Downloads

Published

2021-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Green infrastructure development opportunities in rural settlements. (2021). 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 60, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.36249/60.3

Similar Articles

51-60 of 70

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)