Study of planting density and canopy cover in open spaces in Budapest Case Studies Part 1 - Móricz Zsigmond Square

Authors

  • Barnabás Tóth MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design
  • Judit Doma-Tarcsányi MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design
  • Vera MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden art and Garden design
  • Antal MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design
  • Krisztina MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.74.6247

Keywords:

urban forestry, alles, tree canopy cover, planting density

Abstract

Trees in public spaces are a key part of the urban green space system and are facing increasing challenges from urbanisation, climate change and human interventions. Green spaces significantly improve the microclimate, support biodiversity conservation and have significant aesthetic value, making their protection and enhancement a priority. Our research assesses the canopy cover of open spaces in Budapest in terms of planting density, with a particular focus on the planting distance of woody plants in squares and streets and the resulting canopy cover values. Our studies have considered the quantitative and qualitative variations in the proportion of canopy at the time of planting, at the present time and at full maturity, in order to formulate ideal planting recommendations taking into account the needs and characteristics (crown shape, growth vigour) of each tree species. In our second case study, we examined the tree population of St Gellért Square. The evaluation found that the linear tree groups, regardless of taxon, are growing under near ideal conditions in terms of habit, canopy shape and planting density and are expected to continue to grow well in the future. In contrast, the trees in green boxes are mainly the outgroup individuals that are of long-term value for ecosystem services. The current proportion of open canopy cover is 97%, which is the highest in the open spaces surveyed. The current open canopy cover rate is 97%, which is one of the best among the open spaces studied, but at maturity this rate drops to 52% in the green cassette and 71% in the linear planted tree groups, so it can be concluded that the taxa in the green cassettes will significantly hinder each other's development due to poor planting density and will not be able to fully develop their beneficial effects in the future.

 

Author Biographies

  • Barnabás Tóth, MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design

    PhD student

    e-mail: Toth.Barnabas@uni-mate.hu

  • Judit Doma-Tarcsányi, MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design

    associate lecturer

    e-mail: doma-tarcsanyi.judit@uni-mate.hu

  • Vera, MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden art and Garden design

    assistant lecturer,
    head of department

    e-mail: takacsne.zajacz.vera@uni-mate.hu

  • Antal, MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design

    associate lecturer

    e-mail: Gergely.Antal@uni-mate.hu

  • Krisztina, MATE, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden Art and Garden Design

    associate professor

    e-mail: szabo.krisztina.dendro@uni-mate.hu

References

1. Nowak, David J. – Crane, Daniel E. – Stevens, Jack C. (2006): Air Pollution Removal by Urban Trees and Shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4, 115–123,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007

2. Grote, Rüdiger – Samson, Roeland – Alonso, Rocío –Amorim, Jorge H. – Cariñanos, Paloma –Churkina, Galina – Fares, Silvano – Thiec, Didier Le – Niinemets, Ülo – Mikkelsen, Teis Norgaard – Paoletti , Elena – Tiwary, Abhishek – Calfapietra, Carlo (2016): Functional Traits of Urban Trees: Air Pollution Mitigation Potential. Front Ecol Environ, 14, 543–550,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1426

3. Hrotkó Károly – Gyeviki Márta – Sütöriné Diószegi Magdolna (2021): Aeroszol Részecskék Kiülepedése És Nehézfém-Tartalma Három Fafaj Fajtáinak Levelein Budapesten, In: Kertgazdaság (1998) 1419-2713 53 1 14-31 Available online: https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32021229 (accessed on 28 May 2023).

4. Wolf, Kathleen – McKeen, Jennifer – Richardson, Gregory – Van Den Bosch, Matilda – Bardekijan, Adrian (2020): Urban Trees and Human Health: A Scoping Review, In IJERPH, 17, 4371,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124371

5. Tyrväinen, Liisa – Pauleit, Stephan – Seeland, Klaus – De Vries, Sjerp (2005): Benefits and Uses of Urban Forests and Trees, In Urban Forests and Trees; Konijnendijk, C., Nilsson, K., Randrup, T., Schipperijn, J., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005; pp. 81–114 ISBN 978-3-540-25126-2.

6. Pauleit, Stephan – Fryd, Ole – Backhaus, Antje – Jensen, Marina Bergen (2020): Green Infrastructures to Face Climate Change in an Urbanizing World. In Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology; Meyers, R.A., Ed.; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2020; pp. 1–29 ISBN 978-1-4939-2493-6.

7. Pearlmutter, David – Calfapietra, Carlo – Samson, Roeland – O'Brien, Liz – Krajter Ostoić, Silvija – Sanesi, Giovanni – Alonso Del Amo, Rocío (2017): The Urban Forest: Cultivating Green Infrastructure for People and the Environment, Future City; Springer International Publishing: Cham; Vol. 7; ISBN 978-3-319-50279-3.

8. Chen, Wendy Y. – Jim, C.Y. (2008): Assessment and Valuation of the Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Forests. In Ecology, Planning, and Management of Urban Forests; Carreiro, M.M., Song, Y.-C., Wu, J., Eds.; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2008; pp. 53–83 ISBN 978-0-387-71424-0.

9. Szabó Krisztina (2023): Klímafák és városfásítás; Budapest; ISBN 978-615-01-7157-9.

10. Zipperer, Wayne C. – Sisinni, Susan N. – Pouyat, Richard N. – Foresman, Timothy W. (1997): Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective, Urban Ecosystems 1 (1997) 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018587830636.

11. Nowak, David J. (2004): Assessing Environmental Functions and Values of Veteran Trees, 2004, n.d. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.546.2756.

12. Böll, Susanne (2021). Stadtbäume unter Stress, 8., Available online: https://www.lwf.bayern.de/mam/cms04/boden-klima/dateien/a98_stadtbaeume_unter_stress_bf_gesch.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2023)

13. Gaál, Ladislav – Beranová, Romana – Hlavčová, Kamila – Kyselý, Jan (2014): Climate Change Scenarios of Precipitation Extremes in the Carpathian Region Based on an Ensemble of Regional Climate Models. Advances in Meteorology 2014, 1–14,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/943487

14. Pongrácz Rita – Bartholy Judit – Miklós Erika (2011): Analysis of projected climate change for Hungary using ensembles simulations, Appl Ecol Env Res, 9, 387–398, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0904_387398.

15. Smith, Ian I. – Dearborn, Victoria K. – Hutyra, Lucy R. (2019): Live Fast, Die Young: Accelerated Growth, Mortality, and Turnover in Street Trees. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215846,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215846.

16. Quigley, Martin F. (2004): Street Trees and Rural Conspecifics: Will Long-Lived Trees Reach Full Size in Urban Conditions? Urban Ecosystems, 7, 29–39,

17. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005): Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis;, Ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC; ISBN 978-1-59726-040-4.

18. Aguaron, Elena – McPherson, E.Gregory – Lal, Rattan – Augustin, Bruce (2012): Comparison of Methods for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Storage by Sacramento’s Urban Forest. In Carbon Sequestration in Urban Ecosystems; Lal, R., Augustin, B., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2012; pp. 43–71 ISBN 978-94-007-2366-5.

19. McHale, Melissa R. – Burke, Ingrid C.; Lefsky, M.A – Peper, Paula J. – McPherson, E.Gregory (2009): Urban Forest Biomass Estimates: Is It Important to Use Allometric Relationships Developed Specifically for Urban Trees? Urban Ecosyst, 12, 95–113,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0081-3.

20. McPherson, E.Gregory – Van Doorn, Natalie – De Goede, John (2016): Structure, Function and Value of Street Trees in California, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 17, 104–115,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.013.

21. Pillsbury, Norman – Reimer, Jeffrey – Thompson, Richard (2023): Tree Volume Equations for Fifteen Urban Species in California, Available online: https://ufei.calpoly.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/UrbanTreeEqns.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2023)

22. Close, Richard – Nguyen, Phu – Kielbaso, J.James (1996): Urban vs. Natural Sugar Maple Growth: I. Stress Symptoms and Phenology in Relation to Site Characteristics. AUF, 22, 144–150,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1996.021

23. Tóth, Barnabás (2024): A telepítési sűrűség és a lombkorona-borítottság összefüggései a városi fáknál, Favizsgáló és faápoló szakmérnök szakirányú továbbképzési szak, Szakdolgozat, Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, 2024.

24. Schmidt Gábor (2003): Növények a kertépítészetben; Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest; ISBN 978-963-286-062-6.

25. Tóth, Barnabás – Doma-Tarcsányi, Judit – Szabó, Krisztina (2024): A telepítési sűrűség és a lombkorona-borítottság vizsgálata budapesti szabadtereken: Esettanulmányok 1. rész – Móricz Zsigmond körtér, 4D (2024) 14–31.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.70.4728.

26. Szent Gellért tér | Zöldkalauz, (n.d.). https://zoldkalauz.hu/szent-gellert-ter (accessed November 2, 2024).

27. Balogh Péter István – Erő Zoltán – Mohácsi Sándor (2007): A budapesti „négyes metró” és a városi szabadterek. 4D - Tájépítészeti és Kertművészeti Folyóirat 5-8., 48-55.o.

Available online https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/KerteszetiEgyetem_4Dfolyoirat_2007/?query=szo&pg=49&layout=s (accessed on 22 November 2023)

28. Városklíma Műhely Városklíma Kalauz Available online: http://www2.sci.u-szeged.hu/eghajlattan/pdf/varosklima_kalauz.pdf (accessed on 18 July 2023).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tóth, B., Doma-Tarcsányi, J. ., Takácsné Zajacz, V., Gergely, A., & Szabó, K. (2024). Study of planting density and canopy cover in open spaces in Budapest Case Studies Part 1 - Móricz Zsigmond Square. 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 74, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.74.6247

Similar Articles

1-10 of 173

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)