The Changing Role of Villages based on Village Surveys from the Past 150 Years

Authors

  • Szabolcs Bérczi Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Doctoral School of Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3305-4808
  • Ákos Keszthelyi Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest Department of Landscape and Regional Planning 
  • Ágnes Sallay Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest Department of Landscape and Regional Planning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/62.6

Keywords:

network of settlements, development villages

Abstract

In the last century, because of the socio-economic changes in Hungary, the network of settlements has changed significantly, and thus the traditional role of villages has also changed.
According to contemporary interpretations, the village was the scene of traditional peasant society and of agricultural production, however, over the decades, it was gradually transformed into a new, functionally more diverse, and different form of settlement. The formula "village = agricultural settlement" became invalid before the change of regime,2, 3 but the process intensified after that. This can be explained by the drastic decrease in the proportion of agricultural employees: in 1900 three-fifths (61%) of all employees, in 1990 less than one-fifth, and in 2001 only 6% of all employees worked in the agricultural sector.
Under socialism, the most important sector of the economy was industry, and in terms of employment, 10-15% of the villages in 1970 was industrial and a third was mixed. The transformation of villages was also significantly influenced by the effects of rural and social policy: the development of the socialist economy (collectivisation, industrialisation) gave some areas a locational advantage, and the principles of developing the network of settlements also increased the disparities in supplies, so that the more disadvantaged areas became more and more marginalised due to insufficient technical infrastructure networks and the poor state of housing.
The 1990 Act on Local Government revalued local government, municipalities were "liberated" from the subordination to the spatial level, and the principle of local government considered the institution of local government as the foundation of the democratic system. At the same time, the framework for the development of the network of municipalities was radically changed. The number of local authorities rose to over 3 000, and competition between municipalities intensified as the market economy developed. Suddenly, a large number of municipalities entered a 'market' of free competition between municipalities, where their relative position was determined by their geographical location, the local characteristics and the local policies that took advantage of them.
The development and survival of villages have special relevance these days. In 2018, the Hungarian government aimed to increase the capacity of small settlements to retain and increase their population, as well as to promote the retention of young population, and the repression of migration from villages. It is part of the long-term plans of the government to make villages attractive again for younger generations, families, and those who wish to have their new home in the countryside. For this purpose, the government announced the Hungarian Village Programme in 2018, and from 2019 to 2021 it will announce calls for applications for the third year in a row. Our research examines the development and survival of villages. In this paper we are looking for the answer to the questions of which internal resources the development of villages was based on, which local and locational energies determined their development, and how did they change during the last centuries.
Although our analysis has focused on changes in the resources of villages, we cannot ignore the fact that current spatial policies have also influenced the development potential of villages. Under socialism, settlement policy became a matter of ideology, economic development and structural policy, and some argue that the 1971 National Programme on the Development of the Settlement Network was merely an urban development concept, which put most villages in the category of villages without a function – i.e. not to be developed – and thus made their development impossible. In contrast, the 2005 National Spatial Development Programme made the region-based development of rural areas a national objective, primarily through economic diversification (not exclusively agricultural), while the 2014 spatial development programme gave villages a kind of spatial policy incentive by targeting local economic development and the population retention capacity of small settlements – which, however, can only counterbalance the economic and urbanisation transformation processes to a limited extent.

Author Biographies

  • Szabolcs Bérczi, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Doctoral School of Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology

    urban planner, PhD candidate
    email: berczi.szabolcs@gmail.com

  • Ákos Keszthelyi, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest Department of Landscape and Regional Planning 

    PhD student
    email: keszthelyi.akos.bence@phd.uni-mate.hu

  • Ágnes Sallay, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest Department of Landscape and Regional Planning

    professor
    email: sallay.agnes@uni-mate.hu

References

Beluszky Pál – Sikos T. Tamás (1982): Magyarország falutípusai. MTA Földrajztudományi Kutató Intézet: Budapest.

Beluszky Pál – Sikos T. Tamás (2007): Változó falvaink. Magyarország falutípusai az ezredfordulón. MTA Társadalomkutató Központ, Budapest.

Dövényi Zoltán (2003): A településrendszer fejlődése és sajátosságai. In: Perczel Gy. (szerk.): Magyarország társadalmi-gazdasági földrajza. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó: Budapest. pp 521-532.

Enyedi György (1977): A falusi életkörülmények területi típusai Magyarországon. Földrajzi Értesítő, 26 (1), pp. 67-85. [online] In: Arcanum. URL: https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/FoldrajziErtesito_1977/?pg=76&layout=s [2020. január 17.]

Enyedi György (1980): Falvaink sorsa. Magvető Kiadó: Budapest.

Erdei Ferenc (1940): Magyar falu. Athenaeum, Budapest. [online] In: Magyar Elektronikus Könyvtár. URL: https://mek.oszk.hu/04600/04699/html/ [2020. január 17.)]

Fényes Elek (1851) Magyarország geographiai szótára. Szerző: Pest. [online] In: Arcanum. URL: https://www.arcanum.hu/hu/online-kiadvanyok/ValyiFenyes-orszagleirasok-81A15/fenyes-elek-magyarorszag-geographiai-szotara-84F88/ [2020. január 17.]

Hajdú Zoltán (1992): Település- és településhálózat-fejlesztési politika Magyarországon az államszocializmus időszakában. Földrajzi Közlemények, (116) 1-2. pp. 29-37. [online] In: Arcanum. URL: https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/FoldrajziKozlemenyek_1992/?pg=0&layout=s [2020. január 17.]

Illésy Miklós – T. Nagy Judit – Számadó Róza (2019): Az önkormányzati munka legfontosabb sikertényezői a 21. században. Belügyminisztérium Önkormányzati Koordinációs Iroda, KÖFOP-2.3.4-VEKOP-15-2016-00002 azonosítószámú, „Önkormányzati fejlesztések figyelemmel kísérése II.” (ÖFFK II.) elnevezésű kiemelt projekt. Összegző Tanulmány

Körmendi Klára – Kulcsár Viktor (1976): Falvaink típusai. In: Kulcsár V. (szerk.): A változó falu. Gondolat Kiadó: Budapest. pp. 91-128.

Laki László (2005): A vidék és a falvak a „mezőgazdaság után”. Eszmélet, 17 (67) pp. 164-183. [online] In: EPA. URL: https://epa.oszk.hu/01700/01739/00052/ [2020. január 17.]

Lettrich Edit (1982): Faluhálózatunk fő vonásai. In: Vágvölgyi András (szerk.): A falu a mai magyar társadalomban. Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest. pp. 41-90.

Magyar Falu Program. [online] In: Miniszterelnökség honlapja. URL: https://kormany.hu/miniszterelnokseg/magyarfaluprogram [2021. május 5.]

Murányi Péter (2011): „Aligvárosok” és törpefalvak. A város-falu viszony újragondolása. Pro Publico Bono, 1 (1), pp.1-16.

Rechnitzer János (2010): Területi és vidékpolitika – együtt és külön In: Glatz Ferenc (szerk): Sikeres vidéki térségek. [I. Országos Vidéki Fórum : Győr, 2009. április 27.] (Párbeszéd a vidékért sorozat). MTA Történettudományi Intézet - MTA Társadalomkutató Központ: Budapest, pp. 17-32.

Salamin Géza – Kígyóssy Gábor – Borbély Mátyás – Tafferner Bálint – Szabó Balázs – Tipold Ferenc – Péti Márton (2014): A fejlesztéspolitika és területfejlesztés új koncepciójáról: Az Országos Fejlesztési és Területfejlesztési Koncepció és a 2005-ös országos területfejlesztési koncepció érvényesítésének tapasztalatai. Falu Város Régió, 20 (1), pp. 7-24.

Salamin Géza – Péti Márton – Czira Tamás (2005): Paradigmaváltás küszöbén: Az új Országos területfejlesztési koncepció és a területi tervezés. Területi Statisztika, 8 (5), pp. 423-439.

Salamin Géza – Radvánszki Ádám – Nagy András (2008): A magyar településhálózat helyzete. Falu Város Régió, 3, pp. 6-25.

Timár Gábor – Biszak Sándor – Székely Balázs – Molnár Gábor (2011): Digitized maps of the Habsburg military surveys – Overview of the project of Arcanum Ltd. (Hungary). In: Jobst, M. (eds): Preservation in Digital Cartography. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12733-5_14

Vályi András (1796, 1799): Magyar országnak leírása. [Királyi Universitás]: Buda. [online] In: Arcanum. URL: https://www.arcanum.com/hu/online-kiadvanyok/ValyiFenyes-orszagleirasok-81A15/valyi-andras-magyar-orszagnak-leirasa-87F85/ [2020. január 17.]

Published

2022-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Changing Role of Villages based on Village Surveys from the Past 150 Years. (2022). 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 62, 70-87. https://doi.org/10.36249/62.6