A Review and Categorization of Rain Depth and Rainfall Intensity Measurement Methods

Autores

  • Tibor Rácz Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department for Hydrology and Climate Adaptation, Páter Károly u. 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
  • István Waltner Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department for Hydrology and Climate Adaptation, Páter Károly u. 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.4958

Palavras-chave:

rainfall, measurement, accuracy, classification

Resumo

One of the essential factors shaping the Earth's surface and maintaining the life that has developed there is water. Water has a significant influence on the safety of human activity as well. The source of the surface water is mainly rainfall. Measuring the amount of rain has been an important issue for millennia and has become a scientifically based activity in the last few centuries. In the recent period, several methods have been developed for measuring and detecting precipitation and precipitation intensity, which provide data at different levels of accuracy. In addition to meteorologists and hydrologists, many disciplines use precipitation data included in professional publications without evaluating their accuracy. To evaluate the accuracy of precipitation data originating from a certain data source, the user needs to know its accuracy category and reliability. This article serves this purpose by presenting the rainfall measurement procedures from traditional catching measurements to radar, from satellite-based remote sensing to acoustic measurements, and estimation based on lightning statistics. It also presents the described procedures in tabular form, through which the user of the precipitation data can get an idea of the applied data’s accuracy.

Biografia do Autor

  • Tibor Rácz, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department for Hydrology and Climate Adaptation, Páter Károly u. 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

    Racz.Tibor.Ferenc@uni-mate.hu

  • István Waltner, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department for Hydrology and Climate Adaptation, Páter Károly u. 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary

    Waltner.István@uni-mate.hu

Referências

Alleru, P., Madsen H. 1980: Accuracy of point precipitation measurements. Nordic Hydrology 11(2): 57–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1980.0005

Allerup, P., Madsen H. 1986: On the correction of liquid precipitation. Nordic Hydrology 17(4–5): 237–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1986.0016

Atlas, D., Ulbrich, C. W. 1977: Paths and area integrates rainfall measurement by microwave attenuation in the 1–3 cm band. Journal of Applied Meteorology 16(12): 1322–1331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016<1322:PAAIRM>2.0.CO;2

Cifelli, R., Chandrasekar, V. 2013: Dual-polarization radar rainfall estimation. In: Testic, F. Y. (ed.): Rainfall: state of science. Geophysical Monograph 191, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp. 105–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GM000930

Doumounia, A., Sawadogo, M., Roland, S., Zougmoré, F. 2019: Rainfall estimation using commercial microwave links (CMLs) attenuation: Analyses of extreme event of 1st September 2009 in Ouagadougou. American Journal of Environmental Protection 8(1): 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20190801.11

Folland, C. 1988: Numerical models of the raingauge exposure problem, field experiments and an improved collector design. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 114(484): 1485–1516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711448407

Gaál, L., Molnár, P., Szolgay, J. 2014: Selection of intense rainfall events based on intensity thresholds and lightning data in Swizzerland. Hydrological and Earth System Sciences 18(5): 1561–1563, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1561-2014

Guowei, L. 2001: Hydrology in ancient time in China. Colloque International OH2 « Origines et Histoire de l’Hydrologie », Dijon, 9–11 Mai 2001.

Habib, E., Krajewsky, W. F., Nešpor, V., Kruger, A. 1999: Numerical simulation studies of rain gage data correction due to wind effect. Journal of Geophysical Research 104: 19723–19733, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900228

Habib, E., Krajewsky, W. F., Kruger, A. 2001: Sampling errors of tipping bucket rain gauge measurements. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 6(2): 159–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(159)

Habib, E., Lee, G., Kim, D., Ciach, G. J. 2013: Ground-based direct measurement. In: Testic F.Y. (ed.): Rainfall: state of science. Geophysical Monograph 191, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp. 61–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GM000953

Hadvári M., Szegedi Cs., Csirmaz K., Németh P. 2018: Országos Meteorológiai Szolgálat időjárási radarhálózatának mérései. Országos Meteorológiai Szolgálat Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest.

Hong-Yang, L., Qing, L., Xiong, L., Jia-Long, S. 2010: Compensation algorithm of a new siphon rain gauge. International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurements, Circuits and Systems. Hangzhou People’s Republic of China.

Kidd, Ch., Levizzani, V., Laviola, S. 2013: Quantitative precipitation estimation from Earth observation satellites. In: Testic F.Y. (ed.): Rainfall: state of science. Geophysical Monograph 191, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp. 27–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GM000920

Knolmár, M. 2012: Cost effevtive rainfall monitoring. Hydrology and Water Resources, 15th International SGEM GeoConference, Sofia, Bulgaria, 3(1): 183–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2015/B31/S12.024

Koschmieder H1934: Methods and results of definite rain measurements. III. Danzig report. Monthly Weather Review 62(1): 5–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1934)62<5:MARODR>2.0.CO;2

Kurytka, J. C. 1953: Precipitation measurements study. Department of Registration and Education, State Water Survey Division, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

Lane, J., Kasparis, T., McFarquhar, G. 1997: Acoustic rain gauge array experiment: Phase I. Orlando, FL, USA.

Lanza, L. G., Stagi, L. 2008: Certified accuracy of rainfall data as a standard requirement in scientific investigation. Advances in Geosciences 16: 43–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-16-43-2008

Lanza, L. G., Vuerich, E., Gnecco, I. 2010: Analysis of high accurate rain intensity measurements from a field test site. Advances in Geosciences 25: 37–44, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-25-37-2010

Luycks, G., Berlamont, P. 2002: Accuracy of siphoning rain gauges. American Society of Civil Engineers, Portland USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/40644(2002)251

Mazzoglio, P., Laio, F., Balbo, S., Boccardo, P., Disabato, F. 2019: Improving an extreme rainfall detection system with GPM IMERG data. Remote Sensing 11: 677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060677

Mercanton P. L. 1937: La Mesure correcte des precipitations atmospheriques. La Meteorologie: 136–139.

Michaelides, S., Savvidou, K., Nicolaides, K. 2010: Relationships between lightning and rainfall intensities during rainy events in Cyprus. Advances in Geosciences 23: 87–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-23-87-2010

Negretti, H., Zambra, J. 1861: A treatise on meteorological instruments. Explanatory of their scientific principles, method of construction and practical utility. Negretti and Zambra Establishments, London.

Nešpor, V. 1995: Investigation of wind-induced error of precipitation measurements using a three-dimensional numerical simulation. Dissertation. Zurich: ETH.

Nešpor, V., Sevruk, B. 1999: Estimation of wind induced error of rainfall gauge measurements using numerical simulation. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 16(4): 450–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0450:EOWIEO>2.0.CO;2

NIH 1990: Hydrology in the ancient India. Nationa Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee - Uttharakhand, India.

Nystuen, J. A. 1981: Using underwater ambient noise levels to measure rainfall rate: a review. In: Atlas, O. D. (ed.): NASA. Goddard Space Flight. Greenbelt, Maryland, USA: NASA. Goddard Space Flight.

Nystuen, J. A. 1986: Rainfall measurements using underwater ambient noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79: 972–982, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393695

Nystuen, J. A., McGlothin, C. C., Cook, M. S. 1993: The underwater sound generated by heavy rainfall. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93: 3169–3177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4050701

Nystuen, J. A. 1994: Acoustical rainfall analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 2882–2883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408719

Nystuen, J. A. 1996: Acoustical rainfall analysis: rainfall drop size distribution using the underwater sound field. Journal of the Atmospheric and Ocean Technology 13: 74–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0074:ARARDS>2.0.CO;2

Nystuen, J. A., Proni, J. R., Black, P. G., Wilkerson, J. C. 1996: A comparison of automatic rain gauges. Journal of the Atmospheric and Ocean Technology 13: 62–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0062:ACOARG>2.0.CO;2

Petersen, W. A., Rutledge, S. A. 1998: On the relationship between cloud-to-ground lightning and convective rainfall. Journal of Geophysical Researches103(12): 14025–14040., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02064

Piepgrass, M. V., Krider, E. P. 1982: Lightning and surface rainfall during Florida thunderstorms. Journal of Geophysical Research 87(13): 11193–11201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC13p11193

Rácz T., Bana Zs., Székely Á. 2012: Csapadékmérő hálózatok fejlesztése Budapesten. Magyar Hidrológiai Társaság Vándorgyűlése. Magyar Hidrológiai Társaság. Budapest. pp. 1–9.

Serra, Y. L., A’Hearn, P., Freitag, H. P., McPhaden, M. J. 2001: ATLAS Self-siphoning rain gauge error estimates. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 18: 1989–2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1989:ASSRGE>2.0.CO;2

Seo, D-J., Seed, A., Delrieu, G. 2013: Radar and multisensor rainfall estimation for hydrologic application. In: Testic F.Y. (ed.): Rainfall: state of science. Geophysical Monograph 191., American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C., 79–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GM000952

Sevruk, B. 1982: Methods of correction for systematic error in precipitation measurement for operational use. World Meteorological Organisation, WMO-No. 589, Geneva.

Soula, S., Chauzy, S. 2001: Some aspects of the correlation between lightning and rain activities in thunderstorms. Atmospherical Research 56: 355–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(00)00086-7

Strangeway, I. 2010: A history of rain gauges. Weather 65(5): 133–138, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.548

Tapia, A., Smith, J. A. 1998: Estimation of convective rainfall from lightning observation. Journal of Applied Meteorology 37(11): 1497–1509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1989:ASSRGE>2.0.CO;2

Trono, E. M., Guico, M. L., Libatique, N. J. C., Tangonan, G. I., Baluyot, D. N. B., Cordero, T. K. R., Geronimo, F. A. P., Parreras, A. P. F. 2012: Rainfall monitoring using acoustic sensors. The 2012 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON 2012) “Sustainable Development through Humanitarian Technology”. Manila, Philippines: IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2012.6412284

van Leth, T. C., Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., Uilenhoet, R. 2018: An urban microwave link measurement campaign. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 11: 4645–4669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4645-2018

Vasvári, V. 2005: Calibration of tipping bucket rain gauges in the Graz urban research area. Atmospheric Research 77: 18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.12.012

Vuerich, E., Monesi, C., Lanza, L. G., Stagi, L., Lanzinger, E 2009: WMO field intercomparison of rainfall intensity gauges. WMO/TD-No.1504 World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva.

Waqas, M. M., Awais, M., Shah, S. H. 2020: Estimation of high-resolution rainfall using microwave links data of cellular system. Big Data In Agriculture (BDA) 2(1) 13–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26480/bda.01.2020.17.19

WMO 1992: International Meteorological Vocabulary WMO-Nr.182. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-12-20

Edição

Seção

Cikkek

Como Citar

A Review and Categorization of Rain Depth and Rainfall Intensity Measurement Methods. (2023). TÁJÖKOLÓGIAI LAPOK | JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 21(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.4958

Artigos Semelhantes

31-40 de 48

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.