Human factors of successful teams and their impact on emloyees

Authors

  • Orsolya Hebeny-Fuchs Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences
  • Fehérné Kiss Marianna Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences
  • Gergely Mikola Provident, International Personal Finance
  • Kőműves Zsolt Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18531/sme.vol.11.no.3.pp.19-35

Keywords:

team, performance evaluation, effectiveness, leadership skills, subordinate, commitment

Abstract

Our study intends to approach this question from the human side. Human resource play a central role in every organization. The reason for this is complex: on the one hand, companies recognized that people have special qualities (independent will, attitude, skills, etc.), and on the other hand, they cannot be replaced, or can be replaced only to a limited extent. All of this is reinforced by the lack of adequate human resources. In addition to the personality and individual perfomance of team members and managers, these employees must also be able to work together as a group. In our study, we would like to answer the following questions related to effective groups: What influences effective and efficient work? What characterizes a successful team and its leader, as well as a subordinate working in a successful team? We hope that our readers will receive answers to these questions that can be used in practice.

Hypothesis: In our research, we examined whether a team – which was effective based on the the results of the performance evaluation given by the respondents' employers – meets the five criteria for successful groups described by Lencioni? Whether the leaders of these effective groups have Sinek's five basic leadership skills? Whether the team members of these groups have the three qualities included in the "Ideal Team Player Model" formulated by Lencioni? And whether they are more committed?

Methodology: In the framework of primary quantitative research, we reached 140 people with our questionnaire.

Results: Summarizing the obtained results, the four hypotheses proved to be basically correct, showing moderately strong or weak relationship.

Conclusion: If organizations want to achieve greater success or aim to retain "ideal" employees, fine-tuning is necessary in the areas and processes that show weaker results. This can be achieved by changing the company’s approach and/or management mindset and behavior.

Author Biographies

  • Orsolya Hebeny-Fuchs, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences

    PhD-student
    e-mail: fuchsorsi@gmail.com

  • Fehérné Kiss Marianna, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences

    PhD-student
    e-mail: mariannakiss23@gmail.com

  • Gergely Mikola, Provident, International Personal Finance

    Global Corporate Affairs Director
    e-mail: gergely.mikola@provident.hu

  • Kőműves Zsolt, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences

    associate professor
    e-mail: Komuves.Zsolt.Sandor@uni-mate.hu

References

Chong, Kim W., Andrew Sikula, Sr., and Harlan M. Smith, II., Perceptions of the Characteristics of Good, Bad and Ordinary Workers on the Job: The Influence of Work Experience and Culture. Dias Technology Review: The International Journal for Business and IT 2, no. 2 (2006): 26-37.

Velde, Ch. & Hopkins, Ch. (1994) Reporting Trainee Competence: what, and how much do employers need to know?, The Vocational Aspect of Education, 46:3, 257-271, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305787940460304

Colbert, A. E., Judge, T. A., Choi, D., & Wang, G. (2012) Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality: the mediating role of contributions to group success. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 670–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.004

Collins J. 2001: Jóból kiváló, Harper Business, New York, ISBN 963 7525 688

Golo, H. (2017) Good jobs, good pay, better health? The effects of job quality on health among older European workers The European Journal of Health Economics, 2017, Nr. 1., p. 59-73, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0867-9

Holtzman, Y. & Anderberg, J. (2011). Diversify your teams and collaborate: because great minds don’t think alike. Journal of Management Development, 30(1), 75–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111098389

Jones, W., Haslam R. & Haslam Ch. (2017) What is a ‘good’ job? Modelling job quality for blue collar workers*, Ergonomics, 60:1, 138, 149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1165870

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M.B., and Liao, H. (2009) Getting everyone on board: the role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20, 240–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383

Katonáné, K. J. – Varga, E. – Nemes, G. (2017) Fókuszban a társadalmi innováció folyamata a magyar vidéken, Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek XIV. évf. 2017. 1 pp. 6-19

Keresnyei, K. (2023) Hogyan segítsük a perspektívaváltást időgazdálkodási elakadásoknál? Magyar Coachszemle, A Magyar Coaching Szakfolyóirat XII. évfolyam 1. szám – 2023. február pp. 35-37

Lencioni P. 2009: Kell egy csapat (A sikeres együttműködés 5 akadálya), HVG Kiadó, Budapest, ISBN 978-963-9686-90-8

Lencioni P. 2016: Az ideális csapatjátékos (Hogyan fejlesszük az együttműködés alapkészségeit? Tanmese vezetőknek), HVG Kiadó, Budapest, ISBN 978-963-304-384-4

Lukovszki, L. (2011) Vállalkozói személyiségjegyek – avagy mi teszi a vállalkozót? Vezetéstudomány, XLII. ÉVF. 2011. 11. SZÁM, pp. 16-30, ISSN 0133-0179

O'Meara, B. and Petzall, S. (2009), "Selection criteria, skill sets and competencies: What is their role in the appointment of vice‐chancellors in Australian universities?", International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 252-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540910941757

Peltokorpi, V. and Hasu, M. (2015) Moderating effects of transformational leadership between external team learning and research team performance outcomes. R&D Management, 45, 304–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12091

Schmaling, K. B., Baker, D. L., Blume, A. W., & Trevino, A. Y. (2018). Applicant responses to diversity selection criteria in academic staff position descriptions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2018.1542547

Sinek S. 2009: Start With Why (How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action), Portfolio, New York, ISBN 978-1-59184-280-4

Sinek S. 2010: How great leaders inspire action, Letöltés: 2019. június 9. 22:36, Forrás: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp0HIF3SfI4

Sinek S. 2014: Leaders eat last (Why Some Teams Pull Together and Others Don’t), Portfolio/Penguin, New York, ISBN 978-1-101-62303-9

Smither, J.W., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., AT&T & Stoffey, R.W. (2006). APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00867.x

Szerb L. (2000): Kisvállalati gazdaságtan és vállalkozástan. Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudományi Kar, Pécs

Ton, A. D., Hammerl, L., Weber, D., Kremer, O. & Szabo-Szentgroti, G. (2022) Why leaders are important for cross-functional teams: Moderating role of supportive leadership on knowledge hiding, Problems and perspectives in management, 20 : 3 pp. 178-191. , 14 p. (2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.15

Wang, D., Waldman, D. A. & Zhang, Z. (2014) A metaanalysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 181–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034531

Zoltayné, P. Z. & Szántó, R. (2011): Menedzsmentképességek és döntéshozatali közelítésmódok longitudinális elemzése a versenyképesség-kutatások alapján. Vezetéstudomány, Különszám, p. 87-96.

Published

2024-12-10