Effect of feed additive „Poultry Conditioning WS” on the reproductive parameters of breeder geese

Authors

  • Péter Tóth Szent István Egyetem, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • Csaba Szabó Szent István Egyetem, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • Annamária Kerti Szent István Egyetem, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • István Hutás Pharmatéka Bt., Budapest, Hungary
  • Ákos Treuer Pharmatéka Bt., Budapest, Hungary
  • Janan Janbaz Szent István Egyetem, Gödöllő, Hungary

Keywords:

goose, reproduction, feed additive

Abstract

Feed additive “Poultry Conditioning WS” containing trace minerals, essential vitamins and amino-acids was tested for efficiency on the reproductive parameters in two commercial goose flocks kept in semi-extensive and intensive system, respectively. In both system two-two goose flocks were involved in the experiment. The number of treated and control flocks agreed in the semi-extensive system (1500 layers and 500 ganders) and it was similar in the intensive system (476 geese and 182 ganders, 502 layers and 198 genders, respectively). The treated flocks were given the preparation in a dose of 0.1 g/kg live weight in the drinking water at 10 day intervals. In the semi-extensive system the treatment started 10 days before the expectable onset of egg laying, and in the intensive system it began on 10th June. In the semi-extensive system, the treated flock laid 9 eggs more and had 8% higher laying intensity compared to the controls’, but comparable figures were obtained in the two flocks for egg fertility (93.0%-93.5%), hatchability (89%-89%) and the hatch rates were identical (72%-72%). In the intensive system the treated flock laid only one egg more per goose than the control (41 - 40 eggs) but their eggs had slightly higher fertility (87% vs. 82%) and hatching rate (59% vs. 56%).

References

Amaefule, K. U., Ojewola, G. S., Uchegbu, E. C. (2004): The effect of methionine, lysine and/or vitamin C (ascorbic acid) supplementation on egg production and egg quality characteristics of layers in the humid tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16. 9. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/9/amae16064.htm

Buckland, R., Guy, G. (ed.) (2002): Goose production. In: FAO Animal Production and Health Paper (FAO), no. 154/ FAO, Rome (Italy), Animal Production and Heath Div., 146.

Reddy, V. R. (2004): The role of acidifiers in poultry nutrition. Avitech Technical Bulletin. www.avitechnutrition.com

Weber, M., Sidó, I., Apáti Nagy, G., Ábrahám, Cs., Szabó, R. T., Mézes, M., Erdélyi, M. (2013): Egy lehetséges alternatíva: tenyészludak termelési paramétereinek javítása gyógynövény-kiegészítésekkel. Animal Welfare, Etológia és Tartástechnológia, 9. 393-400.

Published

2014-12-30

Issue

Section

Cikk szövege

How to Cite

Tóth, P., Szabó, C., Kerti, A., Hutás, I., Treuer, Ákos, & Janbaz, J. (2014). Effect of feed additive „Poultry Conditioning WS” on the reproductive parameters of breeder geese. Animal Welfare, Ethology and Housing Systems (AWETH), 10(2), 129-134. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/aweth/article/view/6682

Similar Articles

1-10 of 37

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.