Interpretation possibilities of shore-zones and confining methods in still waters' landscape evaluation

Authors

  • Zsombor Boromisza Dept. of Landscape Protection and Reclamation, Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Corvinus University of Budapest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.19.5791

Keywords:

still water, shore-zone

Abstract

Still waters’ shore zones provide possibility for many utilisation forms, at the same time, ecological, environment protection’s functions, (e.g. special habitat, buffer function) being determinant from the whole water body’s point of view, are also connected to this land zone. In the landscape architectural routine special attention should be given to lakeshores’ planning, to protect landscape potential. To define proper landscaping-, regulating and managing tasks on the long run, a landscape evaluation is necessary, which considers the shore’s special features focusing on the interpretation of shore, shore-zone and on confining an optimal monitoring area. 

Author Biography

  • Zsombor Boromisza, Dept. of Landscape Protection and Reclamation, Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Corvinus University of Budapest

    assistant lecturer

    landscape architect

    e-mail: zsombor.boromisza@uni-corvinus.hu

References

/2006. (I.31.) Korm. rendelet a nagyvízi medrek, parti sávok, a vízjárta, valamint a fakadó vizek által veszélyeztete tt területek használatáról és hasznosításáról, valamint a nyári gátak által védett területek értékének csökkenésével kapcsolatos eljárásról

/2002. (XII.21.) Korm. rendelet a balatoni vízpart-rehabilitációs szabályozás követelményeiről

A Velencei-tó part és mederrendezés munkáinak általános terve (1974). Közép-dunántúli Vízügyi Igazgatóság. Székesfehérvár. 36 p.

Boromisza Zsombor (2009): A Velencei-tó parti sávjának tájrendezési szempontú értékelése, pp. 32. In. Körmöczi László (szerk.): 8. Magyar Ökológus Kongresszus. Előadások és poszterek összefoglalói. Szeged.

Boyd, Lynn (2001): Buffer zones and beyond. Wildlife uses of wetland buffer zones and their protection under the Massachusetts Wetland Protection Act. Department of Natural Resources Conservation. University of Massachusetts. Amherst. 148 p.

Davies, P.M., Lane, J.A.K (1996): The impact of vegetated buffer zones on water and nutrient flow into Lake Clifton, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia. 79. pp. 156-160.

Expertise of the Arbeitsgruppe Bodenseeufer (AGBU) for the Bodensee-Stiftung and the Global Nature Fund, Radolfzell. Constance. 24 p.

Felföldy Lajos (1981): A vizek környezettana. Általános hidrobiológia. Mezőgazdasági Kiadó. Budapest, pp. 73-80.

Jonhston, Robert A., Mixon, Martha A. (1997): Summary of Sebago Lake Shoreline change studies, 1990-1997. Maine Geological Survey. Maine Department of Conservation. http://www.maine.gov/doc/nrimc/mgs/explore/lakes/sites/sebago.htm. Letöltés: 2010.09.21.

Minnesota's Sensitive Lakeshore Identification Manual: a conservation strategy for Minnesota lakeshores (2009). State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Division of Ecological Resources. St. Paul. MN. 62.

P. Ostendorp, Wolfgang., Dienst, Michael, Jacoby, Harald, Kramer, Ingo, Peintinger, Markus, Schmieder, Klaus, Werner, Stefan (2004): General Framework for a Professional Evaluation System for Lakeshore Conservation and Water Body Protection, using Lake Constance as an Example.

Pomogyi Piroska, Szalma Elemér (2006): Makrofita vizsgálati és minősítési módszerek az EU VKI hazai bevezetéséhez. Módszertani útmutató. Verziószám: 1.1. Megbízó: KvVM. Keszthely-Szeged. 36 p.

Rowan, John (2008): Lake habitat survey in the United Kingdom. Field survey guidance manual. The Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research. Edinburgh, pp. 22-35.

Survey of the nation's lakes. Field operations manual (2007). United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Water, Office of Environmental Information. Washington. WA. pp. 48-66.

Toft, Jason, Simenstad, Charles, Young, Cari, Stamatiou, Lia (2003): Inventory and mapping of Seattle Shorelines along Lake Washington, the Ship Canal, and Shilshole Bay.

University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences. Washington. WA. p.34.

Washington Chapter 90.58 RCW: Shoreline management act of 1971. http ://law.justia.com /washington/codes/titlego/qo.58.html. Letöltés: 2010.09.21.

White, Jay S. (2010): Riparian setback matrix model. Draft setback recommendations for Leduc County's Pigeon Lake and Wizzard Lake Area structure plans. Aquality Environmental Consulting Ltd. Edmonton. AB. 33 p.

Downloads

Published

2010-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Interpretation possibilities of shore-zones and confining methods in still waters’ landscape evaluation. (2010). 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 19, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.19.5791

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)