From landscape character to urban image; transformation of vineyards in the old Buda regions

Authors

  • Illyés Zsuzsanna Szent István University, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation
  • Földi Zsófia Szent István University, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation
  • Jákli Eszter Szent István University, Doctoral School of Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation
  • Nádasy László Szent István University, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.48.5669

Keywords:

urban image, landscape character, urban vineyards, landscape history, building character, Buda, Buda hills, Buda villas, green surfaces of Buda, landscape change

Abstract

Buda hills — considered as a live-able  urban  environment  and  attractive living space — has been formed on site of former vineyards. Similar area changes have occurred in different European capitals too, but, in terms of viticulture, corresponding terri- tories have been occupied by urban landscape in a different manner. The primary focus of our study was to identify the building blocks of the Buda facade and its background.

This paper intends to analyse the land-scape/urban transformation Buda vineyards has undergone since the last decades of the 19th century. The changes were analysed at the  same  territory using identical point of views. The study

  • by exploring the phases and driving forces of changes in urban growth and plant cover — intends to present the preserved characteristics and landscape elements of viticulture. Landscape approach of people at all times is pictured through the inconstant ways and tools of searching for landscape The results show, that, in terms of Buda, the civil villas and estate centres of hill estates could be identified as the archetype of the subse- quent urban growth character. The gradual urban growth followed by the phylloxera plague is equally attributed to the constant residential needs and to the inner market crisis of viniculture.

The significant number of trees has a beneficial effect on urban character and a harmonising impact on architectural diversity. On the contrary, today, the same trees rather obstruct the visual connections from the higher parks and lookouts. According to the uniform landscape/urban character of Hegyvidék — divided into districts in terms of public administration —, its similar development history, as well as its values and problems, a capital zone levelled image regulation is needed.

Author Biographies

  • Illyés Zsuzsanna, Szent István University, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

    associated professor, head of department

    landscape architect

  • Földi Zsófia, Szent István University, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

    assistant lecturer

    landscape architect

     

  • Jákli Eszter, Szent István University, Doctoral School of Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

    PhD student

    landscape architect

     

  • Nádasy László, Szent István University, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism, Budapest, Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation

    assistant lecturer

    landscape architect

References

Károly Keleti: Magyarország szőlészeti statisztikája 1860–1873. Bp., 1875

Boromisza, Zs., Csima, P., Dublinszki- Boda, B., Módosné Bugyi, I. (2011): Landscape character assessment met-hodology applied for specific landscape types in Hungary. The Problems of Landscape Ecology. Vol. XXX. pp. 233- 240.

Csima, P. (2012): Tájvédelmi célú tájkarakter elemzések rurális tájban. (Landscape character analyses in rural landscape with a focus on landscape pro- tection) pp. 51-63. In. Farsang A.; Mucsi L.; Keveiné Bárány I. (szerk.): Táj - érték, lépték, változás. Geolitera, Szeged.

Aicher, F., Caviezel, N., Eisel, U., Froh- mann, E., Kirchengast, A., Körner, S., Weber, A. (2016): Landschaft und Lebens- sinn., 144, Müry Salzmann Verlag, Salz- burg-Wien.

Meggyesi, T. (2008): Települési kultú- ráink, Terc.

Szilágyi, K: (2001): Jókai tündérkertje. In: Kalla, Zsuzsa(ed.): Gyümölcsfák, rózsák, regények – Jókai Mór és a Sváb- hegy. Petőfi Irodalmi Múzeum, Budapest. 27-33. p.

Siklóssy, L. (1931): Hogyan épült Budapest? (Published by the Council of Metropolitan Public Works, in 1931, reprinted in 1985.)

Simon, M. (2002): „A hegyekben élő mesebeli óriások”, in: Architectura Hun- gariae, 4 (2).

Budapest Főváros településszerkezeti terve 2015, 1:10000

http://mindennapoktortenete.blog. hu/2014/04/04/psziches_betegsegek_ tortenete

http://www.janoskorhaz.hu/tortenet/

https://www.weingueter-in.de/ oesterreich/weinanbaugebiete/wien/

Downloads

Published

2018-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

From landscape character to urban image; transformation of vineyards in the old Buda regions. (2018). 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 48, 2-39. https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.48.5669

Similar Articles

61-70 of 143

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.