A meggyőző beszéd a retorikában és a mesében

Csilla Molnár

doi:10.17165/TP.2018.1.2

Authors

Csilla Molnár University of Sopron Benedek Elek Faculty of Pedagogy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17165/TP.2018.1.2

Abstract

Although the original sitation of rhetorical speech and the speech in tales bears resemblance with each other (mutual attention of the speaker and the audience, the aesthetic formation of the speech), in my presentation I aim to analyse the difference between the two, in the correlation of persuasion. In rhetoric it means the deliberate use of certain formations to achieve the desired effect on the audience. The basis of persuasion is the acceptance of probability. The tale can be interpreted as a meaning revelation in the hermeneutic progress of understanding, which presupposes the equal inclusion both the speaker and the listener. In this case the speech embodies the world-like presence of language. In conclusion, these two methods of persuasion are in relationship with the deeper disparities of aesthetic impression and aesthetic recognition.

Author Biography

Csilla Molnár, University of Sopron Benedek Elek Faculty of Pedagogy

molnar.csilla@uni-sopron.hu

References

Aczél, P. (2012). Médiaretorika. Magyar Mercurius.

Arisztotelész (1982): Retorika. Gondolat Kiadó.

Biczó, G. (2006). A mese hermeneutikája, In: Bálint Péter (Szerk.), Közelítések a meséhez, (pp. 9–32). Didakt Kiadó.

Derrida, J. (2003). Az idő adománya. Gond-Palatinus.

Foss, S. – Griffin, C. (1995). Beyond Persusasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 2–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345

Gadamer, H.-G. (1984). Igazság és módszer. Akadémiai Kiadó.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1994). A szép aktualitása. T-Twins Kiadó.

Nietzsche, F. (1997). Retorika. In: Thomka Beáta (Szerk.), Az irodalom elméletei IV. (pp. 5–50). Jelenkor Kiadó.