Landscape disruption or just a lack of economic benefits? Exploring factors behind the negative perceptions of wind turbines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3628Schlagwörter:
wind energy, landscape perception, social acceptance, Czech RepublicAbstract
This paper provides new empirical evidence on the hypothesis that the perception of landscape disruption by wind turbines is a substantially subjective and relative matter. It is based on a survey involving nearly five hundred residents living in six different locations with operational wind turbines in the Czech Republic. Geographical and socioeconomic factors and sociodemographic characteristics that affect local community perceptions of landscape disruption are explored using correlations and a regression analysis model. The results suggest that the expressed perception of landscape disruption is not determined by the number of existing wind turbines, the proximity of residences to them and their visibility from the home but is significantly affected by the perception of the economic favourability of projects (benefits to local communities), perception of other negative impacts of wind turbines (particularly the noise annoyance) and the socio-cultural background of people (particularly the level of education).
Literaturhinweise
Baxter, J., Morzaria, R., Hirsch, R. 2013: A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict. Energy Policy 61: 931-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.050
Běťáková, V., Vojar, J., Sklenička, P. 2015: Wind turbines location: How many and how far? Applied Energy 151: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.060
Bidwell, D. 2013: The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy 58: 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.010
Bosley, P., Bosley, K. 1988: Public acceptability of California´s wind energy developments: three studies. Wind Engineering 15(5): 311–318.
Braunholtz, S. 2003: Public attitudes to windfarms: A survey of local residents in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research [online] Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/47133/0014639.pdf (accessed 10.10.17)
Ceňa, A., Iuga, D., Simonot, E., Fichaux, N., Wokke, S., Strem, S. 2010: Wind Barriers: Administrative and grid access barriers to wind power [online] Available from: http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/reports/WindBarriers_report.pdf (accessed 10.10.17)
Dear, M. 1992: Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association 58: 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975808
Eltham, D., Harrison, G., Allen, S. 2008: Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning. Energy Policy 36: 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.010
Energostat 2017. Podíly zdrojů na výrobě [online] Available from: http://oenergetice.cz/energostat/ (accessed 10.10.17)
Frantál, B. 2015: Have local government and public expectations of wind energy project benefits been met? Implications for repowering schemes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17(2): 217–236 Frantál, B., Kunc, J. 2011: Wind turbines in tourism landscapes. Annals of Tourism Research 38(2): 499–519. Groth, T.M., Vogt, C. 2014: Residents' perceptions of wind turbines: An analysis of two townships in Michigan. Energy Policy 65: 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.936583
Hanslian, J., Hošek, J., Štekl, J. 2008: Odhad realizovatelneho potencialu větrne energie na uzemi ČR. Praha: Ústav fyziky atmosféry AV ČR.
Jallouli, J., Moreau, G. 2009: An immersive path-based study of wind turbines’ landscape: A French case in Plouguin. Renewable Energy 34(3): 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.036
Jones, Ch. R., Eiser, R. 2009: Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Policy 37: 4604–4614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015
Kontogianni, A., Tourkolias, C., Skourtos, M., Damigos, D. 2014: Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms. Renewable Energy 66: 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.074
Ladenburg, J., Krause, G. 2011: Local attitudes towards wind power: the effect of prior experience. In: Krause G. (ed.): From turbine to wind farms: technical requirements and spin-off products (pp. 3–14). New York: Intech. https://doi.org/10.5772/14580
Maehr, A.M., Watts, G.R., Hanratty, J., Talmi, D. 2015: Emotional response to images of wind turbines: A psychophysiological study of their visual impact on the landscape. Landscape and urban Planning 142: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.011
Molnárová, K., Sklenička, P., Stiborek, J., Svobodová, K., Šalek, M., Brabec E. 2012: Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics. Applied Energy 92: 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.001
Pedersen, E., Larsman, P. 2008: The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(4): 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.009
Rand, J., Hoen, D. 2017: Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: what have we learned? Energy Research and Social Science 29: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
Ribe, R.G., Manyoky, M., Wissen-Hayek, U., Pieren, R., Heutschi, K., Grêt-Regamey, A. 2018: Dissecting perceptions of wind energy projects: A laboratory experiment using high-quality audio-visual simulations to analyze experiential versus acceptability ratings and information effects. Landscape and Urban Planning 169: 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.013
Sibille, A.D.C.T., Cloquell–Ballester, V.A., Darton, R. 2009: Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(1): 40–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.002
Sklenička, P., Zouhar, Z. 2018: Predicting the visual impact of onshore wind farms via landscape indices: A method for objectivizing planning and decision processes. Applied Energy 209: 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.027
Slattery, M.C., Johnson, B.L., Swofford, J.A., Pasqualetti, M.J. 2012: The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: 3690–3701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.016
Swofford, J., Slattery, M. 2010: Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy 38: 2508–2519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.046
Thayer, R.L., Freeman, C. 1987: Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(87)90051-X
Toke, D. 2005: Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy 33: 1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.009
Warren, C.R., Lumsden, C., O' Dowd, S., Birnie, R.V. 2005: Green on green: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48(6): 853–875 https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294376
Wolsink, M. 2007: Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy 35: 2692–2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2017 Bohumil Frantál, Dan Van Der Horst, Josef Kunc, Martina Jaňurová
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
A folyóirat Open Access (Gold). Cikkeire a Creative Commons 4.0 standard licenc alábbi típusa vonatkozik: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0. Ennek értelmében a mű szabadon másolható, terjeszthető, bemutatható és előadható, azonban nem használható fel kereskedelmi célokra (NC), továbbá nem módosítható és nem készíthető belőle átdolgozás, származékos mű (ND). A licenc alapján a szerző vagy a jogosult által meghatározott módon fel kell tüntetni a szerző nevét és a szerzői mű címét (BY).
