Sustainable Practices in Global Supply Chains of Chinese Enterprises: Biblometeric Approach

Szerzők

  • Ling Yao Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Gazdaság- és Regionális Tudományok Doktori Iskola
  • Desalegn Goshu Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Gazdaság- és Regionális Tudományok Doktori Iskola

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18531/sme.vol.10.no.4.pp.5-19

Kulcsszavak:

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Chinese Enterprises, Supply Chain, Logistics

Absztrakt

Chinese enterprises have indeed recognized the importance of sustainable practices in their global supply chains, with one key practice being the enhancement of supply chain transparency. These enterprises are implementing measures to trace and track raw materials and components, ensuring compliance with sustainability standards and ethical sourcing practices. This transparency is crucial in identifying and mitigating environmental and social risks within the supply chain. However, it is important to note that there is still a lack of extensive research in the context of China regarding sustainable practices in global supply chains. While some studies and initiatives have been conducted, there is a need for more comprehensive research to understand the specific challenges and opportunities faced by Chinese enterprises in adopting and implementing sustainable practices throughout their supply chains. The objective of this study is investigating the research progress on issue related Sustainable Practices in Global Supply Chains of Chinese Enterprises. In doing so, systematic literature research was implemented on the supply chains of Chinese enterprises' foreign direct investment (FDI) to provides insights into the penetration and significance of sustainable concepts in this topic. This paper utilizes advanced data visualization techniques and an in-depth literature review to comprehensively summarize and review previous research extracted from the Web of Science database.  The study included 518 articles and analyzed them through RStudio and VOSviewer software. Research analysis reveals that most of the past research articles on this topic primarily come from China, followed by large economies such as the United States and the United Kingdom. However, when ranked by influence, the order is Canada, the UK, and the US. Around 2020, collaborations between countries mainly occurred in Asian nations. China, enterprises, and FDI are currently the most popular keywords. The importance of sustainability in the research on FDI in Chinese enterprises has been verified through data analysis and theoretical review. Key terms related to sustainability, such as "carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth, and energy consumption", are expected to play a vital role in future research. Current theoretical studies confirm that integrating environmental, social, and economic goals (ESG) into supply chain operations can implement a sustainable philosophy for the entire product lifecycle in Chinese OFDI enterprises. Disseminating sustainable management principles in supply chains among Chinese OFDI companies can contribute to ESG sustainability goals, while also enhancing the long-term profitability of the companies themselves.

Szerző életrajzok

  • Ling Yao, Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Gazdaság- és Regionális Tudományok Doktori Iskola

    PhD-hallgató
    e-mail: yaoling422@gmail.com
    levelező szerző

  • Desalegn Goshu , Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Gazdaság- és Regionális Tudományok Doktori Iskola

    PhD-hallgató
    e-mail: goshudasalegn@gmail.com

Hivatkozások

Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A. and Spalanzani, A. (2012) ‘Sustainable supply management: An empirical study’, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), pp. 168–182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.007

Ahi, P. and Searcy, C. (2013) ‘A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and susta-inable supply chain management’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, pp. 329–341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018

Aktürk, C. (2021) ‘Artifıcial Intelligence in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A Bibliometric Study’, Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 19(2), pp. 69–82.

Ali, U. et al. (2021) ‘Dynamics of outward FDI and productivity spillovers in logistics services in-dustry: Evidence from China’, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, p. 102258.

Alkaraan, F. et al. (2022) ‘Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)’, Technological Forecasting and So-cial Change, 175, p. 121423..

AlRyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W. and Momani, S. M. (2019) ‘Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases’, JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experi-ments), (152), p. e58494.

Baid, V. and Jayaraman, V. (2022) ‘Amplifying and promoting the “S” in ESG investing: the case for social responsibility in supply chain financing’, Managerial Finance, 48(8), pp. 1279–1297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-12-2021-0588

Balon, V. (2020) ‘Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices, and performance—An integrative literature review’, Business Strategy & Development, 3(2), pp. 226–244.

Berning, S. C. (2019) ‘The Role of Multinational Enterprises in Achieving Sustainable Develop-ment – The Case of Huawei’, European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(3), pp. 194–194.

Brahimi, T. and Haneya, H. (2023) ‘Mapping the Scientific Landscape of Metaverse Using VOS-viewer and Bibliometrix’, in 2023 20th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T). 2023 20th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: IEEE, pp. 8–13.

Busse, C. et al. (2016) ‘Supplier development for sustainability: contextual barriers in global supply chains’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(5), pp. 442–468.

Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R. and Esposito, E. (2018) ‘Environmental Sustainability and Energy-Efficient Supply Chain Management: A Review of Research Trends and Proposed Guideli-nes’, Energies, 11(2), p. 275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020275

Chang, Y., Iakovou, E. and Shi, W. (2020) ‘Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities’, International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), pp. 2082–2099.

Choi, T. Y. et al. (2021) ‘Managing extended supply chains’, Journal of Business Logistics, 42(2), pp. 200–206.

Cruz, J. M. (2013) ‘Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility’, International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), pp. 3995–4010.

Das, D. (2018) ‘The impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices on firm perfor-mance: Lessons from Indian organizations’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, pp. 179–196.

Daú, G. et al. (2019) ‘The Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0: The Circular Economy Transition Conceptual Framework with the Corporate Social Responsibility Mirror’, Susta-inability, 11(12), p. 3259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123259

Ding, L., Atallah, G. and Sun, G. (2021) ‘GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN RELATIONSHIP, LO-CAL MARKET COMPETITION, AND SUPPLIERS’ INNOVATION IN DEVELO-PING ECONOMIES’, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(1), pp. 49–75.

Duan, W., Zhu, S. and Lai, M. (2020) ‘The impact of COVID-19 on China’s trade and outward FDI and related countermeasures’, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 18(4), pp. 355–364.

Ejaz, H. et al. (2022) ‘Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Omicron Variant from 2020 to 2022 in the Scopus Database Using R and VOSviewer’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), p. 12407.

Hofmann, E. and Kotzab, H. (2010) ‘A Supply Chain-Oriented Approach of Working Capital Management’, Journal of Business Logistics, 31(2), pp. 305–330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00154.x

Jin, W., Zhang, Q. and Luo, J. (2019) ‘Non-collaborative and collaborative financing in a bilateral supply chain with capital constraints’, Omega, 88, pp. 210–222.

Kowalczyk, M. (2022) ‘Disruptive platforms. Markets, ecosystems and monopolists – monograph review’, e-mentor, 94(2), pp. 4–7.

Lei, Z. et al. (2021) ‘Modelling of risk transmission and control strategy in the transnational supply chain’, International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), pp. 148–167.

Lin, Q. and Xiao, Y. (2018) ‘Retailer credit guarantee in a supply chain with capital constraint un-der push & pull contract’, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, pp. 245–257.

Lu, Q., Gu, J. and Huang, J. (2019) ‘Supply chain finance with partial credit guarantee provided by a third-party or a supplier’, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, pp. 440–455.

Meng, L. et al. (2020) ‘Knowledge Atlas on the Relationship between Urban Street Space and Re-sidents’ Health—A Bibliometric Analysis Based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace’, Sustainability, 12(6), p. 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062384

Muñoz-Torres, M.J. et al. (2019) ‘Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), pp. 439–452.

Peng, J. and Zhou, Z. (2019) ‘Working capital optimization in a supply chain perspective’, Europe-an Journal of Operational Research, 277(3), pp. 846–856.

Polo, A. et al. (2019) ‘Robust design of a closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty conditions integrating financial criteria’, Omega, 88, pp. 110–132.

Raj, A. et al. (2022) ‘Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned’, Journal of Business Research, 142, pp. 1125–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.037

Rejeb, A. et al. (2021) ‘Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review’, Logistics, 5(4), p. 72.

Saini, N. et al. (2022) ‘Environment-Social-Governance Disclosures nexus between Financial Per-formance: A Sustainable Value Chain Approach’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186, p. 106571.

Sandeepa, S. and Chand, M. (2018) ‘Analysis of flexibility factors in Sustainable Supply Chain using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (T-ISM) Technique’, Uncertain Supply Chain Ma-nagement, pp. 1–12.

Shete, P. C., Ansari, Z. N. and Kant, R. (2020) ‘A Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach and its appli-cation to evaluate the enablers of sustainable supply chain innovation’, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 23, pp. 77–93.

Singh, V. K. et al. (2021) ‘The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis’, Scientometrics, 126(6), pp. 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5

Spieske, A. et al. (2022) ‘How did supply chain networks handle the COVID-19 pandemic? Empi-rical evidence from an automotive case study’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Lo-gistics Management, 52(7), pp. 567–601.

Tarofder, A. K. et al. (2019) ‘Impact of Ecological Factors on Nationwide Supply Chain Perfor-mance’, Ekoloji, 28(107), pp. 695–704.

Thürer, M. et al. (2020) ‘A systematic review of China’s belt and road initiative: implications for global supply chain management’, International Journal of Production Research, 58(8), pp. 2436–2453.

Torcsvary, I. (2015) ‘The value creating relation between e-commerce and e-logistics’, Studia Mundi – Economica, 2(2), pp. 169–175. https://doi.org/10.18531/studia.mundi.2015.02.02.169-175

Wang, H. (2019) ‘China’s outward investment: Chinese enterprise globalization’s characteristics, trends and challenges’, in Handbook on China and Globalization. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 9–42.

Wei, F. and Xiong, Z. (2020) ‘Review of Sustainable Supply Chain Performance Evaluation’, in. 5th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2020), At-lantis Press, pp. 194–198.

Wu S., Fan D. and Su Y. (2021) ‘The Co-Evolution of Global Legitimation and Technology Upg-rading: The Case of Huawei’, American Business Review, 24(2), p. 8.

Yan, X. and Yu, H. (2022) ‘Channel structures of transnational supply chains’, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 0(0), p. 0.

Yang, H., Miao, L. and Zhao, C. (2019) ‘The credit strategy of a green supply chain based on capi-tal constraints’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, pp. 930–939.

Zekhnini, K. et al. (2022) ‘A model integrating lean and green practices for viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance’, International Journal of Production Research, 60(21), pp. 6529–6555.

Zeng, B. and Yen, B. P.-C. (2017) ‘Rethinking the role of partnerships in global supply chains: A risk-based perspective’, International Journal of Production Economics, 185, pp. 52–62.

Zhang, S. and Cui, Y. (2021) ‘Research on Robust Financing Strategy of Uncertain Supply Chain System Based on Working Capital’, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(9), pp. 2593–2602. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2020.3003987

Zhu, J. (Jason), Lan, W. and Zhang, X. (2021) ‘Geographic proximity, supply chain and organiza-tional glocalized survival: China’s e-commerce investments in Indonesia’, PLOS ONE, 16(9), p. e0256837. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256837

Letöltések

Megjelent

2023-12-29

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

Cikkek

Hasonló cikkek

91-100 a 106-ból/ből

You may also Haladó hasonlósági keresés indítása for this article.