A new possibility for ensuring clean air in farm buildings

Authors

  • Péter Póti Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Tudományok Intézet, Állattenyésztés-technológiai és Állatjólléti Tanszék, 2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly út 1.
  • Rita Vertséné Zándoki Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Tudományok Intézet, Állattenyésztés-technológiai és Állatjólléti Tanszék, 2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly út 1.
  • Andrea Kosztolányiné Szentléleki Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Tudományok Intézet, Állattenyésztés-technológiai és Állatjólléti Tanszék, 2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly út 1.
  • Árpád Baschán MIELEMED MPM Kft, 1149 Budapest, Egressy út 27-29. 3/B
  • Ferenc Pajor Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Tudományok Intézet, Állattenyésztés-technológiai és Állatjólléti Tanszék, 2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly út 1.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17205/SZIE.AWETH.2023.1.084

Keywords:

air purifying, microelectrostatic precipitation, stall air

Abstract

Stall air may contain various contaminants (gases, dust, microorganisms, viruses) that are harmful for animals and workers. Smallest dust particles (<2,5 μm) can enter even lower parts of the respiratory system, carrying pathogens on their surfaces.

Proper production level can be expected only in a healthy stock, and air quality has singnficant effect on health and welfare status of animals. Contagious diseases like African swine fever and bird flue regularly bring farmers into hard situations. Stall climate also affects health and comfort of farm workers.

Aim of the study was to introduce an innovative technology in air cleansing of indoor livestock housing technologies. In MESP (mikroelectrostatic precipitation) technology, insulated filters with electrostatic maze are applied that remove dust, fungi, black, fume, and inactivate bacteria and viruses. This technology has not been applied in farm buildings yet. MESP technology avoids waste production: filters are ready to be used again after washing, without loss of efficiency, with a lifetime of approximately 10 years. Osone production is negligable. There is neither electric arc formation, nor danger of electric schock. No risk of microbial contamination takes place. Its energy demand is low. MESP can be applied within wide ranges of temperature and air humidity conditions (-15 ℃ - 50 ℃, even 100% humidity).

In tests, efficiency results for elimination of viruses and bacteria were 96,84 - 99,99% and >99,99%, respectively. MESP technology can be an ideal solution for defence against contagious diseases in indoor housig systems. 

Author Biography

  • Péter Póti, Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Tudományok Intézet, Állattenyésztés-technológiai és Állatjólléti Tanszék, 2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly út 1.

    corresponding author
    Poti.Peter@uni-mate.hu

References

Aarnink, A. J. A., Cambra-López, M., Lai, T. L. H., Ogink, N. W. M. (2011): Deeltjesgrootteverdeling en bronnen van stof in stallen: samenvattende rapportage. Wageningen UR Livestock Research. Rapport 452. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/deeltjesgrootteverdeling-en-bronnen-van-stof-in-stallen-samenvatt

AlAbassi, A. M., Sultan, N., Witwit, M. L. (2006): Facts of Bird Flue. Medical Journal of Babylon, 3. 3–4.

Anderson, B., Yondon, M., Bailey, E., Gray, G. C. (2020): Environmental Bioaerosol Surveillance as an Early Warning System for Pathogen Detection in North Carolina Swine Farms: A Pilot Study. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 68. 12. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13683

Chang, C. W., Chung, H., Huang, C. F., Su, H-S. (2001): Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 45. 6. 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/45.6.457

Erastova, D. A., Galbraith, J. A., Cain, K. E., Stanley, M. T. (2022): Effects of urban sugar water feeding on bird body condition and avian diseases. Avian Biology Research 15. 3. 175815592211101. https://doi.org/10.1177/17581559221110107

Hamamura, T., Park, J. H. (2010): Regional Differences in Pathogen Prevalence and Defensive Reactions to the "Swine Flu" Outbreak among East Asians and Westerners. Evolutionary Psychology, 8. 3. 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800315

Kammon, A., Doghman, M., Eldaghayes, I. (2022): Surveillance of the spread of avian influenza virus type A in live bird markets in Tripoli, Libya, and determination of the associated risk factors. Veterinary World, 15. 7. 1684–1690. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1684-1690

Lee, M., Koziel, J. A., Macedo, N., Paris, N. V. (2021): Mitigation of Particulate Matter and Airborne Pathogens in Swine Barn Emissions with Filtration and UV-A Photocatalysis. Catalysts, 11. 11. 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11111302

Manuzon, R., Zhao, L. W., Gecik, C. (2014): An optimized electrostatic precipitator for air cleaning of particulate emissions from poultry facilities. ASHRAE Transactions, 120. 490–503.

Ogunleye, T., Taiwo, A. M., Akinhannmi, T. F., Arowolo, T. (2022): Assessment of air quality, health status and lung function of workers from selected poultry management systems in Ogun State, Nigeria. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 18. 4. 101159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101159

Mostafa, E., Buescher, W. (2011): Indoor air quality improvement from particle matters for laying hen poultry houses. Biosystems Engineering, 109. 1. 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.01.001

Predicala, B. Z., Alvarado, A. C., Girard, M., Belzile, M., Lemay, S., Feddes, J. (2013): Effectiveness of an innovative air cleaning system for reducing ammonia, dust and odor emissions from swine barns. Conference: 2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21 - July 24, 2013. Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.20131620703

Schiffmann, S., Studwell, C. E., Landerman, L., Sundy, J. S. (2005): Symptomatic Effects of Exposure to Diluted Air Sampled from a Swine Confinement Atmosphere on Healthy Human Subjects. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113. 5. 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6814

de Rooij,, Smit, L. A. M., Erbrink, E. J., Hagenaars, T. J., Hoek, G., Ogink, N. W. M., Wountersrs, I. M. (2019): Endotoxin and particulate matter emitted by livestock farms and respiratory health effects in neighboring residents. Environment International, 132. 105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105009

WEIPU Testing Technology (2022): Test Report nr. SHA01-22070446-JC-01EN

Winkel, A., Mosquera, J., Aarnik, A. J., Ogink, N. W. M. (2017): Evaluation of manure drying tunnels to serve as dust filters in the exhaust of laying hen houses: Emissions of particulate matter, ammonia, and odour. Biosystems Engineering 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.07.006

Yee, D., Kabbani, S., Brockman, A., Noble, K. (2021): Efficacy of the airquality AHU-MESP air purifier against SARS CoV2. https://en.airquality.com/docs/FAH%20SARS-CoV-2%20disinfection%20performance%20IBA%20Lab%20report.pdf

Yuferev, L. Yu. (2022): Testing a combined electrical installation and ait disinfection in a poultry house. Agricultural Engineering (Moscow), 24. 3. Farm machinery and technologies. https://doi.org/10.26897/2687-1149-2022-3-45-50

Zhiping, W., Malmberg, P., Larsson, B. M., Anita, S. (1996): Exposure to bacteria in swine-house dust and acute inflammatory reactions in humans. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 154. 5. 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912733

Published

2023-05-30

Issue

Section

Cikk szövege

How to Cite

A new possibility for ensuring clean air in farm buildings. (2023). Animal Welfare, Ethology and Housing Systems (AWETH), 19(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.17205/SZIE.AWETH.2023.1.084