The 25th anniversary of the Faculty of Landscape Architecture at Budapest
Looking back and the contemporary situation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.45.5680Keywords:
Design knowledge, Central and Eastern Europe, Design history, International Master in Landscape ArchitectureAbstract
This article comprises the view of a foreigner and thus outsider on history and contemporary situation of the Faculty of Landscape architecture and Urbanism in Budapest at the 25th anniversary of the Faculty. The outline and line of reasoning are built up along two parts. The first part starts with a short historical overview of the development of the Faculty in terms of education, research and organisation. Landscape architecture education in Hungary did start long before the foundation of the Faculty but here, in the first part, the focus is on the last 25 years. In the second part, the contemporary situation is described briefly. At the moment we see a strong tendency to internationalisation — like in other schools of landscape architecture — both in education (the International
MLA) and in research. One of the conclusions is that the Faculty should move towards a specific focus on the long tradition of planning and design in the Central and Eastern European landscape, to stand out and develop its historically strong position further in the future. This will give future students a clear perspective on their choice of the program and at the same time puts forward a large part of the research agenda. The article will be continued in 4D, next issue 46. In the second part, I take look at the present situation; what is happening at the Faculty at the moment? The background idea is that the past could be a basis for the future, also as a source of inspiration.
References
ALMÁSI, Balázs (2007): Methodological development of green network planning, on case study of Budapest. PhD dissertation. Budapest,
CUB
BALOGH, Péter István (2006): Functional change of urban open spaces in the traditional European urban renewal projects. PhD dissertation.
Budapest, CUB
Bardóczi, Sándor, & Szilágyi K. & Nemes, Z. & Sándor, T. & Szloszjár, Gy. 2011 Landscape odyssey — Selections of the most significant works of Hungarian landscape architecture 2000-2010. Budapest, HCA Landscape Architecture Division, 2011
Bardóczi, S. 2015 (ed.): Landscape odyssey — Landscape architecture in Hungary, the most significant projects and artworks 2010-2015
Budapest, Hungarian Association of Landscape Architects, 2015.
Csepely-Knorr, Lucca 2016: Barren places to public spaces — A history of public park design in Budapest 1867-1914. Budapest, I. Kenyeres, 2016.
Diedrich, L. & J. Bridger & M. Hendriks & C. Moll (eds.) on the move #4. Wageningen, Blauwdruk/LAE Foundation, 2015.
Fábos et al., 2010 : Fábos, J.G. & R.L. Ryan & M.S. Lindhult & P. Kumble & L. Kollányi & J. Ahern & S. Jombach (eds.) Proceedings Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning 2010. Budapest, Corvinus University, Dept. of Landscape Planning and Regional Development, 2010
Fekete, A. 2007. Transylvanian garden history — Castle-gardens along the Maros river. Kolozsvár, Müvelödés, 2007
FEKETE, A. & TOORN, M.v.d. 2017. Land, landscape and landscape architecture — List of references for the Master of Landscape Architecture (MLA)
Gazvoda, Davorin 2012. Characteristics of contemporary Chinese landscape design. 4D Journal of Landscape architecture and Garden Art (2012) #25
HUTTER, Dóra (2015) Development of Budapest green system with revitalisation of Railway brown fields. PhD dissertation. Budapest, CUB
JÁMBOR, Imre (1978). TU Dresden. Zur Entwicklung von Freiräumen in Siedlungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der ökologischen
Bedingungen und des Freiraumelementes Pflanze. CSC dissertation
JÁMBOR, Imre 2012. Education from garden design to landscape architecture in Hungary. 4D Journal of Landscape architecture and Garden art (2012) – 27. p. 12-24
Juarez, Ivan 2017: Sensory trails Normafa. 4D Journal of Landscape architecture and Garden art (2017) #43. p 48-49
Kollányi 2002. Landscape architecture in the developing urban regions — Complexity and specialisation in landscape archtecture education in the frame of the European Landscape Convention. Budapest, Fac. of Landscape architecture, 2002
Motloch, J.L.2001: Introduction to Landscape Design. New York, 2001, 2nd ed.
Schön, D.A.1987: Educating the reflective practitioner — Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions San Francisco, Jossye-Bass Publ., 1987, 1st pr.
Szabó Á, G. Szabó, P.I. Balogh: Landscape and identity in the adaptable city. 4D Journal of Landscape architecture and Garden art (2013) #32
SZILÁGYI, Kinga (1996). The evaluation methods of urban green system – on case study of Budapest. CSc dissertation, HAS, Budapest
Szilágyi, K. et al., 2012. Mihály Möcsényi and the Hungarian landscape architecture school. 4D Journal of Landscape architecture and Garden art (2012) #27
SZILÁGYI, Kinga (2013). Hundred years of education and research in garden history and garden art — From the Institute for Horticultural Education to the Faculty of Landscape Architecture. 4D Journal of Landscape architecture and Garden art (2013) – 29. p 22-35
Valánszki et al., 2016 [1; 2]):
Valánszki, I. & S. Jombach & K. Filep-Kovács & J.G. Fábos & R.L. Ryan & S. Lindhult & L. Kollányi (eds.) Greenways and landscapes in change — Proceedings of the 5th Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning — Budapest, 30 June 2016 — Vol. 1. Budapest, Sz. István University / Univ. of Massechusetts, 2016
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Martin Van Den Toorn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A folyóirat Open Access (Gold). Cikkeire a Creative Commons 4.0 standard licenc alábbi típusa vonatkozik: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0. Ennek értelmében a mű szabadon másolható, terjeszthető, bemutatható és előadható, azonban nem használható fel kereskedelmi célokra (NC), továbbá nem módosítható és nem készíthető belőle átdolgozás, származékos mű (ND). A licenc alapján a szerző vagy a jogosult által meghatározott módon fel kell tüntetni a szerző nevét és a szerzői mű címét (BY).
