Comparative coenological examinations on pastures of the Great Hungarian Plain I.

Horse and cattle pasture near Hódmezővásárhely

Authors

  • Tímea Kiss Kecskemét College, Dept. of Floriculture, 6000 Kecskemét, Erdei Ferenc tér 1-3.
  • Ákos Malatinszky Szent István University, Institute for Environmental and Landscape Management, Dept. of Landscape Ecology, 2103 Gödöllő, Páter Károly u. 1.
  • Károly Penksza Szent István University, Institute for Environmental and Landscape Management, Dept. of Landscape Ecology, 2103 Gödöllő, Páter Károly u. 1.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.4471

Keywords:

grazing, overgrazing, trampling, alkali grassland, coenological examination

Abstract

Two groups of coenological relevés were prepared in 1997 and 2005 on sandy, alkali areas near Hódmezővásárhely town. Areas situated inside and near (0 to 50 meters far from) an animal husbandry farm belong to the first group. Coenological relevés gained from areas situated 50 to 150 meters far from intensively used areas belong to the second group. Data evaluation was made with considering naturalness state in case of habitats; and on the other hand, according to relative ecological factors of occurring species. A significant change in species composition could be detected. Particularly, deterioration of areas could be experienced. These negative processes are extremely heavy inside and near the animal husbandry farm. Even aggressive, invasive plant species occurred. Among dominant grass species, dominance relations and covering rate of disturbance tolerant Cynodon dactylon and Lolium perenne species have increased, caused partly by overgrazing and trampling as well. Farther from the farm, rate of degradation showed by vegetation has decreased compared to the areas closer to the farm, however, it has increased even on the farther area between the two time periods. During the preparation of management plans for the grasslands, these data should be considered at a higher rate in favour of preserving natural values, especially because the biggest population of nature protected Trifolium subterraneum lives in this area.

Author Biography

  • Károly Penksza, Szent István University, Institute for Environmental and Landscape Management, Dept. of Landscape Ecology, 2103 Gödöllő, Páter Károly u. 1.

    corresponding author
    penksza@freestart.hu

References

Borhidi A. 1995: Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian flora. Acta Bot. Sci. Hung. 39: 97–181.

Boros Á. 1922–1968: Florisztikai jegyzetek. (Floristic notes). (manuscript).

Bodrogközy Gy. 1965a: Ecology of the Halophilic Vegetation of the Pannonicum III. Results of the Investigation of the Solonetz of Orosháza. Acta Biol. Szeged 11: 3–25.

Bodrogközy Gy. 1965b: Ecology of the Halophilic Vegetation of the Pannonicum IV. Investigations on the Solonetz Meadow Soils of Orosháza. Acta Biol. Szeged- 11: 207–227.

Bodrogközy Gy. 1966: Ecology of the Halophilic Vegetation of the Pannonicum V. Results of the Investigation of the “Fehértó” of Orosháza. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Tomus 12: 9–26.

Bodrogközy Gy. 1980: Szikes puszták és növénytakarójuk. Békés megyei Múz. Közlem. 6: 29–49.

Bodrogközy Gy., Horváth, I. 1969: Production examinations on plant associations of grass-lands with solonetz soil I. Effect of climatic and soil factors on dry matter, carbohydrate and nitrogen contents of Artemisio-Festucetum pseudovinae. Acta Biol. Szeged. 15: 207–227.

Braun-Blanquet J. 1951: Pflanzensociologie II. Wien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4078-9

Halász Á. 1889: Makó város és környéke növényzete. Közs. Polg. leányisk. ért. Makó pp. 1–30.

Kelemen J. (szerk.) 1997: Irányelvek a füves területek természetvédelmi szempontú kezeléséhez. A KTM Természetvédelmi Hivatalának Tanulmánykötetei 4.

Magyar P. 1928: Adatok a Hortobágy növényszociológiai és geobotanikai viszonyahoz. Erd. Kisérl. 30: 26–63.

Penksza K., Kapocsi J., Engloner A. 1997: Phytosociological study of Trifolio subterranei-Festucetum pseudovinae ass. nov. Crisicum 2: 67–83.

Simon T. 2000: A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója. – Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Soó R (1933): a Hortobágy növénytakarója (A szikespuszta növényszövetkezeteinek ökológiai és szociológiai jellemzése). Debreceni Szemle. Városi Nyomda Debrecen. pp. 1–26.

Soó R., Máthé I. 1938: A Tiszántúl flórája. (Flora Planitiei Hungariae Transtibiscensis). Magyar Flóraművek. II. Inst. Bot. Univ., Debrecen, 192 pp.

Tímár L. 1954: Adatok a Tisztántúl (Crisicum) flórájához. Ann. Biol. Univ. Hung. 2:491–499.

Downloads

Published

2006-12-12

Issue

Section

Tanulmányok, eredeti közlemények

How to Cite

Comparative coenological examinations on pastures of the Great Hungarian Plain I.: Horse and cattle pasture near Hódmezővásárhely. (2006). JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY | TÁJÖKOLÓGIAI LAPOK , 4(2), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.4471

Similar Articles

161-170 of 179

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>