Economic valuation of selected invasive species

Authors

  • András Demeter Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.
  • Dávid Sarlós Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Organic Farming and Agri-environmental planning, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.
  • Julianna Skutai Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.
  • Imre Tirczka Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Organic Farming and Agri-environmental planning, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.
  • Gábor Ónodi Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Organic Farming and Agri-environmental planning, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.
  • Szilárd Czóbel Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3673

Keywords:

bioeconomic study, invasive plant, black locust, tree of heaven

Abstract

The spreading of invasive species causes serious economic and environmental problems in our days. The recognition of these negative effects, and protection against them are based on estimates, assessing the extent of the damage. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) and tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima Mill.) are widespread and extremely dangerous tree species in Hungary. In our research we analyzed economic potential and cost of restraint of the above mentioned species. During the data collection we sent thematically compiled questionnaire to the relevant state institutions (10 national park directorates and 22 state forest companies). In addition, other publicly available background information was collected and telephone interviews were carried out complementing of data set. Questionnaires covered items of income and expense (15 items) in aspect of the analyzed species for the 2009–2013 period. A significant number of incoming data came from national park directorates, but vast majority of the state forest companies did not give information despite of multiple requests. During evaluation of data, we found that costs of black locust reduction were so high (sometimes hundreds of millions of HUF) that those could not be compensated by revenue from the sale. However, in the case of the state forest companies, incomes were several times bigger than costs in each year. Judgment of tree of heaven was negative in all areas. They could not be sold, so no revenue was derived from their presence, but reduction was very expensive.

Author Biography

  • András Demeter, Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter Károly Street 1.

    corresponding author
    demetex@gmail.com

References

Bartha D., Csiszár Á., Zsigmond V. 2006: Fehér akác. In: Botta-Dukát Z,. Mihály B. (szerk.): Özönnövények II. Line & More Kft, Budapest, pp. 37–61.

Bartosságh J. 1841: Beobachtungen und Erfahrungen über den Götterbaum (Ailanthus glandulosa L.) – Ofen, Gyurián u. Bagó. III, 47 pp.

Ditomaso, J. M. 2000: Invasive weeds in rangelands: Species, impacts, and management. Weed Science 48(2): 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0255:IWIRSI]2.0.CO;2

Haraszthy L. 2013: Értékőrző gazdálkodás Natura 2000 területeken. Pro Vértes Természetvédelmi Közalapítvány, Csákvár, 87 pp.

Leung, B., Lodge, D. M., Finnoff, D., Shogren, J. F., Lewis, M. A., Lamberti, G. 2002: An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 269: 2407–2413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2179

Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., Morrison, D. 2005: Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002

Reményfy L. 2014: Az akác, töviről hegyire. Erdészeti Lapok 149(5): 157.

Soó R., Jávorka S. 1951: A magyar növényvilág kézikönyve. I–II. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Szmorad F., Tímár G. 2014: Az akáckérdésről – tényszerűen. Erdészeti Lapok 149 (4): 116.

Udvardy L. 2004: Bálványfa. In: Mihály B., Botta-Dukát Z. (szerk.): Özönnövények. Természetbúvár Alapítvány Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 143–154.

Vereb I. 2014: Ezerarcú akác – szakmai konferencia Baktalórántházán. Erdészeti Lapok 149(6): 202.

http1: Nagy, L. (ed.) 2014: Országos Erdészeti Egyesület, On-Line - http://www.oee.hu/hirek/agazati-szakmai/hungarikum_akac_akacmez (hozzáférés: 2015. január 28.)

Published

2015-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Economic valuation of selected invasive species. (2015). JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY | TÁJÖKOLÓGIAI LAPOK , 13(2), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3673

Similar Articles

31-40 of 200

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>