The recognition of resource use through industrial development from a social perspective


  • Bálint Horváth Szent István University, Climate Change Economics Research Centre



self-sufficiency, resource management, industrial revolution


Rural population is vulnerable partly for its lack of self-sufficiency. This recognition considerably varies from the way rural territories functioned more than 200 years ago. The peasant societies were well known about sustaining themselves. A major trigger for the disappearance of this pattern was industrialization. This paper explicitly reviews a social perspective of industrialism and provides a novel point of view regarding its overall recognition. The present study states that there was an incremental effect of relying on machines. People have lost their sense of practical skills. Another hidden pattern of development was to utilize finite resources. The reason behind it might come from the fact that this way allows companies to distribute energy according to their own terms. As a conclusion, the paper argues that centralized (energy and industrial) production systems have increased the dependence of society – especially in case of rural population. Furthermore, it claims that the next stage of industrial revolution could enable people to return to self-sufficiency.

Információk a szerzőről

  • Bálint Horváth, Szent István University, Climate Change Economics Research Centre

    Phd student


Allianz. (2010): The sixth Kondratieff – long waves of prosperity. Allianz, 2010 January, Analysis & Trends report, 28 p.

Brander, J. A. – Taylor M. S. (1998): The Simple Economics of Easter Island: A Ricardo-Malthus Model of Renewable Resource Use. The American Economic Review, 88 (1), 119-138.

Brockway, P. E. – Saunders, H. – Heun, M. K. – Foxon, T. J. – Steinberger, J. K. – Barrett, J. R. – Sorrell, S. (2017): Energy rebound as a potential threat to a low-carbon future:Findings from a new exergy-based national-level rebound approach. Energies, 10 (1), 51. DOI:

De Gregori, T. R. (1987): Resources Are Not; They Become: An Institutional Theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 21 (3), 1241-1263. DOI:

de Wit M. – Bardout M. – Ramkumar S. – Kubbinga B. (2016): The Circular Dairy Economy - Exploring the business case for a farmer led, ‘netpositive’ circular dairy sector. Publisher: Circle Economy / Friesland Campina in Holland, 20 p.

Demandbase. (2017): 4 Key Themes We Saw at Dreamforce 2017. Online:

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2014): Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Ellen MacArthur Foundation Publisher, 64 p.

Fogarassy, Cs. – Orosz, Sz. – Ozsvári, L. (2016): Evaluating system development options in circular economies for the milk sector – Development options for production systems in the Netherlands and Hungary. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering, 30, 62-74. DOI:

Gedicks A. (1993): The New Resource Wars: Native and Environmental Struggles Against Multinational Corporations. South End Press, 270 p. ISBN: 978-0896084629

Hogan, A. – Lockie S. (2013): The coupling of rural communities with their economic base: agriculture, localism and the discourse of self-sufficiency. Policy Studies, 34 (4), 441-454 p. DOI:

Horvath, B. – Magda R. (2017): Possible bottlenecks in the strategic management of environmentally engaged companies – Transition to the world of circular businesses. In: 12th International Conference on Strategic Management and its Support by Information Systems, 11-20 p.

Jarman, C. L. – Larsen, T. – Hunt, T. – Lipo, C. – Solsvik, R. – Wallsgrove, N. – Ka’apu-Lyons, C. – Close, H. G. – Popp, B. N. (2017): Diet of the prehistoric population of Rapa Nui (Easter Island, Chile) shows environmental adaptation and resilience. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 164, (2), 343-361. DOI:

Jevons W. S. (1865): The Coal Question. London, Macmillan & Co, 213 p.

Jones, G. S. (2017): In retrospect: Das Kapital. Nature, 547, 401-402. DOI:

Khazzoom, J. D. (1989): Energy Savings from More Efficient Appliances: A Rejoinder. The Energy Journal, 10 (1), 157-166. DOI:

Korotayev, A. V. – Tsirel, S. V. (2010): A Spectral Analysis of World GDP Dynamics: Kondratieff Waves, Kuznets Swings, Juglar and Kitchin Cycles in Global Economic Development, and the 2008-2009 Economic Crisis. Structure and Dynamics 4 (1), 3-57.

Korten D. C. (1995): When Corporations Rule the World. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 386 p.

Magda R. (2010): A vidékgazdaság fejlődésének természeti alapjai (in Eng: The natural base of rural economy development). in: Magda R. – Marselek S. (eds.): Vidékgazdaságtan I: A vidékfejlesztés gazdasági folyamatai (in Eng: Rural Economy I: The economic processes of rural development). Szaktudás Publishing House, 41-95 p.

Magda, R. (2011): A zöldgazdaság és a foglalkoztatás (in Eng: The Green Economy and Employment). Európai Tükör: Az integrációs stratégiai munkacsoport kéthavonta megjelenő folyóirata (1996-2011), 2011 (4), 85-96.

Mankiw N. G. (2012): Principles of Economics (6th edition). Boston, South-Western College Publishing, 576 p., ISBN: 978-1285032184

Modelski G. – Thompson W. R. (1995): Leading Sectors and World Powers: The Coevolution of Global Economics and Politics. University of South Carolina, 263 p. ISBN: 978-1570030543

Rae, C. – Bradley, F. (2012) Energy autonomy in sustainable communities - a review of key issues. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (9), 6497-6506, DOI:

Reinert H. – Reinert E. S. (2006): Creative Destruction in Economics: Nietzsche, Sombart, Schumpeter. In: Friedrich Nietzsche 1844-1900: Economy and Society, Chapter 4, Springer Publisher, 55-85 p. DOI:

Rifkin J. (2014): Zero Marginal Cost Society. Palgrave MacMillan Trade, 368 p. ISBN: 978-1137280114

Rosen W. (2012): The Most Powerful Idea in the World: A Story of Steam, Industry and Invention. University of Chicago Press, 149 p. ISBN: 978-0-226-72634-2

Samuelson P. A. – Nordhaus W. D. (2009): Economics (19th edition). McGraw-Hill Education, 744 p. ISBN: 978-0073511290

Sauberer, G. – Riel A. – Messnarz R. (2017): Diversity and PERMA-nent Positive Leadership to Benefit from Industry 4.0 and Kondratieff 6.0. In: EuroSPO 2017: Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, 642-652 p. DOI:

Saunders, H. D. (1992): The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. The Energy Journal, 13 (4), 131–148. DOI:

Saunders, H. D. (2008): Fuel conserving (and using) production functions. Energy Economics, 30 (5), 2184–2235. DOI:

Schumpeter J. A. (1961): The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New York, Oxford University Press, 255 p.

Schumpeter J. A. (1976): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (5th edition). George Allen & Unwin, 437 p.

Simai M. (2015): A harmadik évezred nyitánya – A zöld fejlődés esélyei és a globális kockázatok. Budapest, Corvina Kiadó, 374 p. ISBN: 978-963-13-6385-2

Sorrell, S. (2007): The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. London, Energy Research Centre, 108 p.

Sorrell, S. (2009): ‘Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency’. Energy Policy, 37 (4), 1456-1469. DOI:

Szilágyi T., Boldizsár G.: (2016) A biztonságos vidék, mint az állam létfeltétele PRO SCIENTIA RURALIS 1:(4) pp. 24-34.

Tanning, T. – Saat, M. – Tanning, L. (2013): Kondratieff wave: overview of world economic cycles. Global Business and Economics Research Journal, 2 (2), 1-11.

Zimmerman E. W. (1951): World Resources and Industries – A Functional Appraisal of The Availability of Agricultural and Industrial Materials. New York, Harper and Brothers, 823 p.




Hasonló cikkek

1-10 a 91-ból/ből

You may also Haladó hasonlósági keresés indítása for this article.