The Role of local production systems in the establishment of sustainable consumer attitude


  • Bálint HORVÁTH Szent István Egyetem, Gazdaság- és Társadalomtudományi Kar



local markets, production systems, national resource balance, international trade


The present study elaborates on the importance of material flows in the context of local and global production systems. The theoretical part describes how population growth induced the need for global production and how it contributed to further welfare disparities. The research focuses on the socio-economic processes of globalization with a special consideration on resources. It states that business processes have grown over the importance of territorial affairs in the past 100-150 years. Movements requiring war conflicts in previous times are currently conducted through international trade relations. The spread of empires has been replaced by global corporate expansion. The paper reviews essential literature concerning this hypothesisand argues for the transparency of resource utilization throughout the phenomenon. The results stand for the introduction of border adjustment taxes based on accurate resource valuation. The preference of local markets does not only strengthen local economies but comes significant regarding sustainable resource management

Információk a szerzőről

  • Bálint HORVÁTH, Szent István Egyetem, Gazdaság- és Társadalomtudományi Kar

    PhD student


Auerbach, A. J. (1997): The Future of Fundamental Tax Reform. The American Economic Review, 87 (2), 143-46.

Auerbach A. J. (2010): A Modern Corporate Tax. The Center for American Progress and The Hamilton Project, 29 p.

Babiker, M. H. (2005): Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. Journal of International Economics, 65 (2), 421–445. DOI:

Bakos, I. (2017): Local Food Systems Supported by Communities Nationally and Internationally. Deturope, 9 (1), 59-79

Boserup E. (1965): The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure. Routledge, 124 p.

Carly, S. – Baldwin, E. – MacLean, L. M. – Brass, J. N. (2017): Global Expansion of Renewable Energy Generation: An Analysis of Policy Instruments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68 (2), 397-440. DOI:

Daly H. E. (1977): Steady-state economics. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 318 p.

Dong-dong, C. – Wang-sheng, G. – Yuan-quan, C. – Qiao, Z. (2010): Ecological footprint analysis of food consumption of rural residents in China in the latest 30 years. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 106-115. DOI:

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2014): Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Ellen MacArthur Foundation Publisher, 64 p.

Elliott, J. – Fullerton, D. (2014): Can a unilateral carbon tax reduce emissions elsewhere? Resource and Energy Economics, 36 (1), 6-21. DOI:

Ervine, K. (2014): Diminishing Returns: Carbon Market Crisis and the Future of Market-Dependent Climate Change Finance. New Political Economy, 19 (5), 723-747. DOI:

Fedoroff, N. V. et al. (2010): Radically Rethinking Agriculture for the 21st Century. Science, 327 (5967), 833-834. DOI:

Fischer C. – Fox A. K. (2009): Comparing Policies to Combat Emissions Leakage –Border Tax Adjustments versus Rebates. Resources for the Future, 34 p.

Fogarassy, Cs. – Neubauer, E. – Bakosné, B. M. – Zsarnóczai, J. S. – Molnár, S. (2014): Water footprint based water allowance coefficient. Water Resources and Industry, 7-8, 1-8. DOI:

Fogarassy, Cs. – Orosz, Sz. – Ozsvári, L. (2016): Evaluating system development options in circular economies for the milk sector – Development options for production systems in the Netherlands and Hungary. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering, 30, 62-74. DOI:

Fogarassy, C. – Horvath, B. – Borocz, M. (2017): The interpretation of circular priorities to Central European business environment with focus on Hungary. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6 (1), 2-9. DOI:

Friedman T. L. (2005): The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Farra, Straus and Girroux, 488 p.

Galli, A. – Kitzes, J. – Niccolucci, V. – Wackernagel, M – Wada, Y. – Marchettini, N. (2012): Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint: A focus on China and India. Ecological Indicators, 17, 99-107. DOI:

Gedicks A. (1993): The New Resource Wars: Native and Environmental Struggles Against Multinational Corporations. South End Press, 270 p. ISBN: 978-0896084629

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975): Energy and Economic Myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41 (3), 347-381.

Gilbertson T. – Reyes O. (2009): Carbon Trading – How it works and why it fails. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 104 p.

Herva, M. – Franco, A. – Ferreiro, S. – Álvarez, A. – Roca, E. (2008): An approach for the application of the Ecological Footprint as environmental indicator in the textile sector. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 156 (1-3), 478-487. DOI:

Hoekstra, A. Y. – Mekonnen, M. M. (2012): The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (9), 3232-3237. DOI:

Horvath, B. – Bakosne, B. M. – Fogarassy, Cs. (2015): How does the European Union’s climate policy function on global level? – The effects of “Carbon Leakage”. in: Science connecting nations: 2nd VUA YOUTH conference proceedings, 665-685.

Humphries, J. (2013): Childhood and child labour in the British industrial revolution. The Economic History Review, 66 (2), 395-418. DOI:

Kerpely, K. – Horváth B. – Bakosné B. M. (2016): A természeti környezet értékelésének vizsgálata kinyilvánított preferenciákból becsült érték meghatározásával (in Eng: The examination of ecosystem valuation using revealed preference approach). Studia Mundi – Economica, 3 (2), 59-67. DOI:

Korten D. C. (1995): When Corporations Rule the World. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 386 p.

Lambooy, T. (2011): Corporate social responsibility: sustainable water use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (8), 852-866. DOI:

Lee, K – Cheong I. (2011): Measuring a carbon footprint and environmental practice: the case of Hyundai Motors Co. (HMC). Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111 (6), 961-978. DOI:

Lee, R. (2011): The Outlook for Population Growth. Science, 333 (6042), 569-573. DOI:

Magda R. (2010): A vidékgazdaság fejlődésének természeti alapjai (in Eng: The natural base of rural economy development). in: Magda R. –Marselek S. (eds.): Vidékgazdaságtan I: A vidékfejlesztés gazdasági folyamatai (in Eng: Rural Economy I: The economic processes of rural development). Szaktudás Publishing House, 41-95 p.

Magda, S. – Magda, R. – Marselek, S. (2009): Possibilities of the sustainable development of the rural economy. In: Nábrádi, A. – Lazány, J. – Fenyves, V. (eds.): AVA Congress 4. International Congress on the Aspects and Visions of Applied Economics and Informatics, 31-36.

Malthus T. M. (1798): An Essay on the Principle of Population. Malthus press, 148 p.

Mankiw N. G. (2012): Principles of Economics (6th edition). Boston, South-Western College Publishing, 576 p., ISBN: 978-1285032184

Meadows D. H. – Meadows, D. L. – Randers J. – Behrens, W. W. (1972): The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books, 205 p.

Murshed, S. M. – Serino, L. A. (2011): The pattern of specialization and economic growth: The resource curse hypothesis revisited. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22 (2), 151-161. DOI:

Pfister, S. – Bayer, P. (2014): Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 52-62. DOI:

Polereczki Zs. – Soós M. (2012): Magyar termék – magyar fogyasztó (in Eng: Hungarian product – Hungarian consumer). In: Szakály Z. – Szente V. (eds.): Agrártermékek közvetlen értékesítése, marketingje (Direct sales and marketing of agricultural products). Szaktudás Publishing House.

Poterba, J. M. (1991): Tax policy to combat global warming: On designing a carbon tax. in: Dornbusch R. – Poterba J. M. (eds.). (1991): Global Warming: Economic Policy Responses, Cambridge. DOI:

Ransome P. (2005): Work, Consumption and Culture – Affluence and Social Change in the Twenty-first Century. Sage Publications Ltd., 224 p.

Schneider, S. A. (2012): Reconsidering the Industrialization of Agriculture. Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 26 (1), 19-27.

Simai M. (2015): A harmadik évezred nyitánya – A zöld fejlődés esélyei és a globális kockázatok. Budapest, Corvina Kiadó, 374 p., ISBN: 978-963-13-6385-2

Simon J. (1983): The Ultimate Resource. Princeton University Press, 432 p.

Stahel W. R. (2010): The Performance Economy. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers Ltd, 349 p. DOI:

Szakály Z. – Szigeti O. – Szente V. – Polereczki Zs. (2009): Az etnocentrikus fogyasztói magatartás vizsgálata Magyarországon (in Eng: The analysis of ethnocentric consumer attitute in Hungary). Research report – AMC.

Szaky T. (2014): Outsmart waste: the modern idea of garbage and how to think our way out of it. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 168 p.

Thaler R. H. – Sunstein C. R. (2009): Nudge, Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, Happiness. Penguin Books, 312 p.

Toth, G. – Szigeti, C. (2016): The historical ecological footprint: From overpopulation to over-consumption. Ecological Indicators, 60, 283-291. DOI:

United Nations (2014): World Urbanization Prospects [Highlights]. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Divison, 32 p.

Wackernagel M. – Rees W. (1996): Our Ecological Footprint. Reducing Human Impact on Earth. New Society Publishers, 160 p.

Weinzettel, J. – Hertwich, E. G. – Peters, G. P. – Steen-Olsen, K. – Galli, A. (2013): Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environmental Change, 23 (2), 433-438. DOI:

Wirth, L. (1938): Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology, 44 (1), 1-24. DOI:

Wright, L. – Kemp, S. – Williams, I. (2011): 'Carbon footprinting': towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management, 2 (1), 61–72. DOI:




Hasonló cikkek

1-10 a 193-ból/ből

You may also Haladó hasonlósági keresés indítása for this article.