The effect of parity number on the growth performance of piglets around weaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.2625Keywords:
weaning stress, first parity sow, second parity sow, piglet weight gainAbstract
In this study, authors examined the effects of parity number on piglet weight gain around weaning. The research was carried out on a Hunagrian pig farm on the litters of 3 first parity (P1) and 3 second parity (P2) Landrace x Large White sows. The traits examined were individual weight, weight gain, and number of deaths. A total of 90 piglets were individually weighed 9 times. Thus, measurements were taken at 1 day of age, at 10, 20, 26, 28, 29, 30, 36, and 47 days of age. Weaning occured on the 28th day. The difference in weight can be seen as early as 1 day of age between the piglets of the two groups (290 grams). The 1-day average weight of piglets in the P1 group was 1.20 kg, and the average weight of piglets of P2 sows was 1.49 kg (P <0.05). The observed difference remained until the end of the study, it was 2650 grams at 47 days of age. At this time, the mean weight of the piglets of P1 sows was 12.13 kg, while the average weight of the piglets of P2 sows was 14.78 kg (P <0.05). In terms of weight gains, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups over four periods, including the post weaning periode. During this period, however, weight loss occurred. The weight of the piglets of P1 sows fell to a greater extent. In their case, the average daily weight loss at that time was 185 g. The other group had a weight loss of 80 g over the same period. Several of the piglets (95.2%) of P1 sows lost weight on the day after weaning while 73.5% of the piglets of P2 sows showed weight loss on this day. Based on the results it can be said that piglets of P1 sows are more sensitive to weaning than piglets of P2 sows. At the last measurement time point, there was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two groups. There is a moderate association (R2=0.22) between the weight gains measured in the pre- and post-weaning period, with the weight of individuals gaining more in the pre-weaning period falling to a greater extent after weaning. There was a higher mortality rate among the piglets of the P2 sows. The weak piglets died in the first 4 weeks of the trial except for 1 piglet.
References
Balogh P., Novotniné D. G. (2013). Versenyképes kocatartás és malacnevelés. Bp.: Szaktudás Kiadó Zrt.
Barceló J. (2009). What is the best age for weaning piglets? Downloded: Link: https://www.pig333.com/articles/what-is-the-best-age-for-weaning-piglets-1-3_1566 (Downloaded: 01.15.2018)
Bruininx, E. M. A. M., Binnendijk, G. P., van der Peet-Schwering, C. M. C., Schrama, J. W., den Hartog, L. A., Everts, H., Beynen, A. C. (2002). Effect of creep feed consumption on individual feed intake characteristics and performance of group-housed weanling pigs, J. Anim. Sci., 80(6), 1413–1418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8061413x
Burkey, T. E., Miller, P. S., Johnson, R. K., Reese, D. E., Moreno, R. (2008). Does dam parity affect pro-geny health status?, Nebraska Swine Reports. 36. University of Nebraska, Nebraska-Lincoln.
Gondret, F., Lefaucheur, L., Louveau, I., Lebret, B., Pichodo, X., Le Cozler. (2005). Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance, tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight In: Livestock Production Science 93 (2005) 137-146.
Gadd J. (2011). Modern Pig Production Technology. Nottingham University Press
Hendrix, W. F., K. W. Kelley, C. T. Gaskins, and D. J. Hinrichs. (1978). Porcine neonatal survival and serum gamma globulins. Journal of Animal Science 47, 1281- 1286.
Holyoake, P. K. (2006). Dam parity affects the performance of nursery pigs. In: International Pig Veterinary Society Conference, Denmark. p. 149.
Horn P., Pászthy Gy., Bene Sz. (2011). Sertéstenyésztés- A malacok takarmányozása Downloded: Link: https://www.tankonyvtar.hu/hu/tartalom/tamop425/0059_sertestenyesztes/ch06s02.html (Downloaded: 12.05.2017)
Michiels, J., De Vos, M., Missotten, J., Ovyn, A., De Smet, S., Van Ginneken C. (2012). Maturation of diges-tive function is retarded and plasma antioxidant capacity lowered in fully weaned low birth we-ight piglets. British Journal of Nutrition, 109(1), 65-75.
Piñeiro, C., Manso, A., Manzanilla, E.G., Morales J. (2019). Influence of sows’ parity on performance and humoral immune response of the offspring. Porc Health Manag 5, 1
Pluske J. R., Kim J.-C., Hansen C. F., Mullan B. P., Payne H. G., Hampson D. J., Callesen J., Wilson R. H. (2007). Piglet growth before and after weaning in relation to a qualitative estimate of solid (creep) feed intake during lactation: A pilot study. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61(6), 469-480.
Smith, A.L., Stalder, K.J., Serenius, T.V., et al. (2007). Effect of piglet birth weight on weights at weaning and 42 days post weaning. J Swine Health Prod. 2007;15(4), 213–218.
Tantasuparuk, W., Lundeheim, N., Dalin, A.-M., Kunavongkrit,A., Einarsson, S. (2001). Weaning-to-service interval in primiparous sows and its relationship with longevity and piglet production. Livestock production science 69, 155-162.
Vila, R. M. (2013). Welfare and management strategies to reduce pre weaning mortality in piglets.
Wiseman, J., Varley, M.A., Chadwic,k J.P. (1998). Progress in Pig Science. Nottingham University Press; Nottingham, UK
www.bpex.org.uk. (2010) Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) (Downloaded: 03.25.2018.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nagyné Kiszlinger Henrietta, Horváth Alexandra
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.