Analysis of spatial experience - the example of the graden of Versailles

Authors

  • Catherine Szántó Benedict Schmidl Studio Ltd.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.23.5860

Keywords:

Garden of Versailles, open space, spatial planning

Abstract

In current theoretical literature on land- scape architecture, the debate "space" versus "piacé" opposes two types of spatiality: the abstract homogeneous space of Science, and the meaningful space (piacé) of everyday life . The strongly geometrical garden types - such as the so-called French "classical" garden - are often accused of dismissing the experiential, place-making qualities of spatial design, and are opposed to more fluid geometries, such as that of the English "landscape" garden.
This debate arises from a mistaken opposition between two modes of perceiving and manipulating space. Indeed, it is nőt their opposition, bút their association in a variety of combi- nations that allows fór the experiential richness and the unique spatial expe- rience offered by a specific place/space, such as, fór instance, the Gardens of Versailles.

Author Biography

  • Catherine Szántó, Benedict Schmidl Studio Ltd.

    landscape architect

    e-mail: k.szanto@wnadoo.fr

References

Bacsó B., szerk., 2011. Tér fenomén mű, Budapest, Kijárat kiadó.

BerthozA., 1997. Le sens du mouvement, Paris, Editions Odile Jacob.

Berthoz A., 2000 (1997). The Brain's Sense of Movement, Harvard University Press.

Casey E., 1998. The Fate of Place.

A Philosophical History, Berkeley, University of Califomia Press.

Genette G., 2010 (1994,1996). L'oeuvre de l'art. I: Immanence et transcendance. II:

La relation esthétique, Paris, Seuil.

Genette G., 1997 (1994). The Work of Art: Immanence and Transcendence, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

Genette G., 1999 (1996). The Aesthetic Relation, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

Gibson J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston, Houghton Mifflin.

Gyáni G., 2008. Budapest - túl jól és rosszan.

A nagyvárosi múlt mint tapasztalat. Budapest, Napvilág Kiadó.

Husserl E., 2011. « Dolog és tér », in : Bacsó B., Tér Fenomén Mű, Budapest, Kijárat Kiadó, 2011. Merleau-Ponty M., 1981 (1945).

Phénoménologie de la Perception, Paris, Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty M., 2005 (1945).

Phenomenology of Perception, London, Routledge.

Moles A., Rohmer E., 1982. Labyrinthes du vécu. L’espace: matiére dáction, Paris, Librairie des Méridiens.

Moravánszky Á., Gyöngy K., 2007. A tér, Budapest, TERC.

Petitot J., 2004, Morphogenése et esthétique, Paris, Maisonneuve et Larose.

Straus (Erwin), 1935. Vöm Sinn der Sinne, Berlin, Springer Verlag.

Straus (Erwin), 1963 (1935). The Primary World of Senses: a Vindication of Sensory Experience, London, Collier-MacMillan.

Szántó C., 2009. Le promeneur dans le jardin de lapromenade considérée comme acte esthétique. Regards sur les jardins de Versailles, ENSA Paris-La Viliette / Université Paris-VIII, http://lcv.hypotheses.org/3058

Valéry P., 1962. Ecrits sur l'art, Paris, Club des Libraires de France.

Wallon H., 1970. De l’acte á la pensée, Champs- Flammarion.

Welton D., ed., 1999. The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings in Transcendental Phenomenology, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Published

2011-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Analysis of spatial experience - the example of the graden of Versailles. (2011). 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 23, 32-47. https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.23.5860

Similar Articles

31-40 of 122

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.