Suggested landscape and agri-environmental condition assessment

Autores

  • Attila Barczi Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1.
  • Péter Csorba Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Dénes Lóczy Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Gábor Mezősi Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Éva Konkolyné Gyuró Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Emőke Bardóczyné Székely Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Péter Csima Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • László Kollányi Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Erzsébet Gergely Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Szilvia Farkas Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • József Ángyán Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • László Podmaniczky Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Béla Pirkó Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Katalin Joó Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Csaba Centeri Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Viktor Grónás Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Márton Vona Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary
  • Ákos Pető Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.4150

Palavras-chave:

landscape ecology, indicators, agri-environmental program

Resumo

In its first study, the working group of land evaluation and land use (agriculture) has outlined the scientific area, described its connections to other sciences and examined the international data providing needs. In its second study we collected the available digital maps and datasets for the regardless of their scale to help data communication in a common information collecting work platform. We evaluated the general availability, the stage of digitalization, difficulty in availability and their information content. For further evaluation we took into account the legal and decision support background and the possibilities of regulations and publicity. Furthermore we described the legal background of the land protection and agricultural (land use), the survey of the Hungarian and EU data providing tasks, the survey of the operation of land protection and agri-environmental programs and institutions. We analysed methodologies on the fields of agricultural suitability-environmental sensitivity, suitability of agricultural production, agro-ecological value and environmental sensitivity. In our third study we connected models and databases and created a possible parameter set (indicators). Our suggested indicators were introduced in oral presentations on Science’s Day, at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, in 2006. These were as follows: landscape indicators: a) 1. landscape pattern, 2. landscape fragmentation, 3. land use stability, 4. connectivity, 5. state of health of the landscape; b) agri-environmental indicators: 1. areas brought into the programs and their distribution by target programs, 2. rate of large and small scale farming (and the rate of extensive and intensive agriculture), 3. nitrogen output (organic+inorganic), 4. erosion. The chosen indicators were described as follows: name of the indicator, explanation for choosing the indicator, definition of the indicator, possibility of measuring/estimating the indicator (with available maps and datasets), planned monitoring activity with the indicator.

Biografia do Autor

  • Attila Barczi, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1.

    Landscape Group, Agri-environmental Group
    barczi.attila@mkk.szie.hu

  • Péter Csorba, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Dénes Lóczy, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Gábor Mezősi, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Éva Konkolyné Gyuró, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Emőke Bardóczyné Székely, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Péter Csima, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • László Kollányi, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Erzsébet Gergely, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • Szilvia Farkas, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Landscape Group

  • József Ángyán, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • László Podmaniczky, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • Béla Pirkó, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • Katalin Joó, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • Csaba Centeri, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • Viktor Grónás, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • Márton Vona, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

  • Ákos Pető, Szent István University, Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, H-2103 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1., Hungary

    Agri-environmental Group

Referências

Barabási A. L. 2002: Linked. The new science of networks.

Barta K. 2004: Talajeróziós modellépítés a EUROSEM modell nyomán. Doktori (PhD) disszertáció. Szeged, p. 84

Blaschke, T. 2000: Die Vernetzung von Landschaftselementen: Die Rolle von GIS in der Landschaftsplanung. Landschaftsplanung und GIS 6., p. 17-26.

Blume, H. P., Sukopp, H. 1976: Ökologische Bedeutung anthropogener Bodenveränderungen. Vegetationskunde Heft 10. Bonn-Bad Godesberg, p. 75-89.

Centeri Cs. 2002: A talajerodálhatóság terepi mérése és hatása a talajvédő vetésforgó kiválasztására. Növénytermelés. 51: 211-222.

Centeri, Cs., Barta, K., Jakab, G., Bíró, Zs., Császár, A. 2004: Comparison of the results of soil loss prediction with WEPP and EUROSEM models based on 'in situ' soil loss measurements. Conference Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of the ESSC, p. 355-357.

Csorba P. 2005: Kistájaink tájökológiai felszabdaltsága a településhálózat és a közlekedési infrastruktúra hatására. Földrajzi Értesítő, 54: 243-263.

Forman, R. T. T. 1995: Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107050327

Goodwin, B. J., Fahrig, L. 2002: How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99: 552-570. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11824.x

Gustafson, E. J. 1998: Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900011

Huszár T. 1999: Talajerózió-becslés az EPIC-EROTOP módszerrel. Földrajzi Értesítő, 48: 189-198.

Mcgarigal, K., Holmes, C. 2002: Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis devloped for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR.

Merriam, G. 1984: Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. In: Brandt, J., Agger, P. (eds.): Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning Vol. I. Roskilde Universitessforlag GeoRue, Roskilde, Denmark) p. 5-15.

Milne, B. T. 1988: Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Appl. Mathem. Comput. 27: 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(88)90099-9

Németh T. 1996: Talajaink szervesanyag-tartalma és nitrogénforgalma. MTA TAKI, Budapest

Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., Merriam, G. 1993: Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68: 571-573. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544927

Termelői adatbázis, MVH, 2006.

Tóth A., Szalai Z., Jakab G., Kertész Á., Bádonyi K., Mészáros E. 2001: Talajpusztulás modellezése a MEDRUSH modell alkalmazásával. Földrajzi Értesítő, 49: 1-4.

Turner, M. G. 1989: Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131

Wiensr J. A., Milne B. T. 1989: Scaling of 'landscapes' in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecology 3: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131172

Wischmeier, W. H., Smith, D. D. 1978: Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA Agriculture Handbook 537, Washington, D. C., p. 58

Working document VI/43512/02 Final on common indicators for monitoring the planning of Rural development and working document VI/12004/00. Common Evaluation Question with Criteria and Indicators

Downloads

Publicado

2008-08-11

Edição

v. 6 n. 1-2 (2008)

Seção

Cikkek

Licença

Copyright (c) 2008 Barczi Attila, Csorba Péter, Lóczy Dénes, Mezősi Gábor, Konkolyné Gyuró Éva, Bardóczyné Székely Emőke, Csima Péter, Kollányi László, Gergely Erzsébet, Farkas Szilvia, Ángyán József, Podmaniczky László, Pirkó Béla, Joó Katalin, Centeri Csaba, Grónás Viktor, Vona Márton, Pető Ákos

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

A folyóirat Open Access (Gold). Cikkeire a Creative Commons 4.0 standard licenc alábbi típusa vonatkozik: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0. Ennek értelmében a mű szabadon másolható, terjeszthető, bemutatható és előadható, azonban nem használható fel kereskedelmi célokra (NC), továbbá nem módosítható és nem készíthető belőle átdolgozás, származékos mű (ND). A licenc alapján a szerző vagy a jogosult által meghatározott módon fel kell tüntetni a szerző nevét és a szerzői mű címét (BY). 

Como Citar

Suggested landscape and agri-environmental condition assessment. (2008). TÁJÖKOLÓGIAI LAPOK | JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 6(1-2), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.4150

Artigos Semelhantes

1-10 de 117

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9