Diverse energy transition patterns in Central and Southern Europe: a comparative study of institutional landscapes in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, and Spain

Autor/innen

  • Marina Frolova Department of Regional and Physical Geography, University of Granada, Spain, Institute for Regional Development, University of Granada, Spain
  • Bohumil Frantál Institute of Geonics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
  • Viviana Ferrario Department of Architecture and Arts, IUAV University Venice, Italy
  • Csaba Centeri Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • Daniel Herrero-Luque Department of History, Geography and Communication, University of Burgos, Spain
  • Viktor Grónás Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • Martinát Stanislav Institute of Geonics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic, School of Geography and Planning, Cardiff University, Wales
  • Matteo Puttilli Department of History, Archeology, Geography, Fine and Performing Arts, University of Florence, Italy
  • Lucas Almeida Institute for Regional Development, University of Granada, Spain
  • Fabrizio D'Angelo Department of Architecture and Arts, IUAV University Venice, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3571

Schlagwörter:

renewable energy, institutional landscapes, drivers of transition, policy, comparative analysis

Abstract

Growing awareness of anthropogenic climate change, deep cuts in CO2 emissions, and the exhaustion of easy-to-extract fossil fuels have led to a growing interest in developing renewable energy sources as a part of the (desired) transition to a low-carbon society. The target of the European Union for 2020 is to cover 20% of final energy consumption by renewable energy sources, and for 2030 it should reach at least 32%. While there are ambitious goals to boost the energy transition, it is becoming increasingly evident that the processes run differently in different countries, some of which still prefer path-dependent options and resist major changes. This comparative study applies a historical institutionalist approach to examine the institutional factors influencing the development of renewable energies in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy and Spain, countries with different geographies, political and socio-cultural traditions, belonging respectively to Central and Southern Europe, whose comparison has so far been largely neglected in the literature. The general objective of this paper is to investigate and exemplify how diverse energy traditions, institutional frameworks, policies, and practices shape the processes and outcomes of the renewable energy transition.

Autor/innen-Biografie

  • Marina Frolova, Department of Regional and Physical Geography, University of Granada, Spain, Institute for Regional Development, University of Granada, Spain

    corresponding author
    mfrolova@ugr.es

Literaturhinweise

AEEGSI 2017: Annual report 2016: Autorità per l'Energia Elettricail Gas e il Sistema Idrico Agencia Andaluza de la Energía, 2018: La bioenergía en Andalucía.

Ajanovic, A. 2011: Biofuels versus food production: does biofuels production increase food prices? Energy 36: 2070–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.019

Azofra, D., Saenz-Díez, J.C., Martínez, E., Jiménez, E., Blanco, J. 2016: Ex-post economic analysis of photovoltaic power in the Spanish grid. Alternative Scenarios. Renew. Energy 95: 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.005

Bouzarovski, S., Tirado Herrero, S. 2016: The energy divide: Integrating energy transitions, regional inequalities and poverty trends in the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415596449

Buen, J. 2006: Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion. Energy Policy 34(18): 3887–3897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.003

Buzar, S. 2007: Energy Poverty in Eastern Europe. Hidden Geographies of Deprivation, Ashgate, Burlington. Calvert, K., Mabee, W. 2015: More solar farms or more bioenergy crops? Mapping and assessing potential land-use conflicts among renewable energy technologies in eastern Ontario, Canada. Applied Geography 56: 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.028

Candelise, C., Ruggeri, G. 2017: Community energy in Italy: heterogeneous institutional characteristics and citizens engagement, Working paper 93, IEFE - The Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy at Bocconi University

Chen, W. M., Kim, H., Yamaguchi, H. 2014: Renewable energy in eastern Asia: Renewable energy policy review and comparative SWOT analysis for promoting renewable energy in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Energy Policy 74: 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.019

Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., Kulla, M., Novotny, L. 2017: The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 35:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0002

Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., Martinat, S., Cowell, R. 2019: Community tensions, participation, and local development: Factors affecting the spatial embeddedness of anaerobic digestion in Poland and the Czech Republic. Energy Research & Social Science 55: 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.010

CIB – Consorzio Italiano Biogas e Gassificazione, 2011: Filiera biogas-biometano 2020. Il biogas fatto bene. Le proposte del gruppo di lavoro biogas – biometano per lo sviluppo della filiera, per l'attuazione del D.Leg. n. 28 del 03.03.11 e la regolazione dell'autorizzazione degli impianti a biogas-biometano (www.consorziobiogas.it)

Cruccu S., Giannopoulou G., van der Linden T. 2014: European solar PV portfolios, Solar Plaza.

Davies, S. W., Diaz-Rainey, I. 2011:The patterns of induced diffusion: Evidence from the international diffusion of wind energy. Technological forecasting and social change 78(7): 1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.012

de la Hoz, J., Martína, H., Martins, B., Matasc, J., Miretc, J. 2013: Evaluating the impact of the administrative procedure and the landscape policy on grid-connected PV systems (GCPVS) on-floor in Spain in the period 2004–2008: To which extent a limiting factor? Energy Policy 63: 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.056

del Rio, P., Mir-Artigues, P. 2012: Support for solar PV deployment in Spain: some policy lessons. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16: 5557–5566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.011

Ferguson-Martin, C. J., Hill, S. D. 2011: Accounting for variation in wind deployment between Canadian provinces. Energy Policy39(3): 1647–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.040

Ferrario V., Reho M., 2015: Looking beneath the landscape of carbon-neutrality. Contested agro energy landscape in the dispersed city. In: Frolova M., Prados M. J., Nadaï A. (eds), Renewable energies and European landscapes. Lessons from the southern European cases, Springer, pp. 95–113 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3_6

Frantál, B., Kunc, J. 2010: Factors of the uneven development of wind energy projects (a case of the Czech Republic). Geografický Časopis 62(3): 183–201.

Frantál, B., van den Horst, D., Kunc, J., Janurová, M. 2017: Landscape disruption or just a lack of economic benefits? Exploring factors behind the negative perceptions of wind turbines. Tájökológiai Lapok 15(2): 139–147.

Frolova, M., Pérez Pérez, B. 2011: New landscape concerns in the development of renewable energy projects in South-West Spain. In: Roca, Z., Claval, P. Agnew, J. (eds), Landscapes, Identities and Development, Farnham, Ashgate Publishing, pp. 389–401.

Frolova, M., Prados, M-J, Nadaï, A. (eds.) 2015: Renewable Energies and European Landscapes: Lessons from Southern European cases. Springer, Dordrecht https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3

Frolova, M., Centeri, Cs., Benediktsson, K., Hunziker, M., Kabai, R., Scognamiglio, A., Martinopoulos G., Sismani, G., Brito, B., Muñoz-Cerón, E., Slupinski, M., Ghislanzoni, M., Braunschweiger, D., Herrero- Luque, D., Roth, M. 2019: Effects of renewable energy on landscape in Europe: comparison of hydro-, wind, solar, bio-, geothermal and infrastructure energy landscapes. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68(4): 317–339. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.4.1

GSE 2018: Fonti rinnovabili. Rapportostatistico 2017, GestoredeiServiziEnergetici S.p.A.

GSE 2019: Solare fotovoltaico. Rapportostatistico 2018, GestoredeiServiziEnergetici S.p.A.

Hammarlund Kramer, K., Frolova, M., Brånhult, A. 2016: Wind power development and landscape: social participation, opportunities and challenges. In: Cao W., Hu, Y. (Eds.), Renewable Energy - Utilisation and System Integration, InTech Chopin, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5772/63424

IRENA 2019: Renewable Energy Statistics 2019. [online] Available from: https://www.irena.org/-

/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Jul/IRENA_Renewable_energy_statistics_2019.pdf

Jobert, A., Laborgne, P., Mimler, S. 2007: Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy 25 (5): 2751–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005

Klessmann, C., Held, A., Rathmann, M., Ragwitz, M. 2011: Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? Energy Policy 39(12): 7637–7657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.038

Kriechbaum, M., López Prol, J., Poscha, A. 2018: Looking back at the future: Dynamics of collective expectations about photovoltaic technology in Germany & Spain. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 129: 76– 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.003

Lauf, T., Ek, K., Gawel, E., Lehmann, P., Söderholm, P. 2018: The Regional Heterogeneity of Wind Power Deployment: An Empirical Investigation of Land-use Policies in Germany and Sweden. UFZ Discussion Papers 1: 1–30.

Legambiente, 2011: Fonti Rinnovabili e Paesaggio. Il punto sulle linee guida per l'autorizzazione degli impianti da fonti rinnovabili nelle Regioni italiane. Gli obiettivi europei al 2020 e le politiche per lo sviluppo di eolico, solare, idroelettrico, biomasse, geotermia (www.legambiente.it).

Lofstedt, R. 2008: Are renewables an alternative to nuclear power? An analysis of the Austria/Slovakia discussions. Energy Policy 36: 2226–2233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.022

López Prol, J., 2018: Regulation, profitability and diffusion of photovoltaic grid-connected systems: A comparative analysis of Germany and Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 91: 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.030

Luňáčková, P., Průša, J., Janda, K. 2017: The merit order effect of Czech photovoltaic plants. Energy Policy 106: 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.053

Mahalingam, A., Reiner, D. 2016: Energy subsidies at times of economic crisis: A comparative study and scenario analysis of Italy and Spain. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 1608, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B. 2012: Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41(6): 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

Martinát, S., Navrátil, J., Dvořák, P., Van der Horst, D., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J., Frantál, B. 2016: Where AD plants wildly grow: The spatio-temporal diffusion of agricultural biogas production in the Czech Republic. Renewable Energy 95: 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.077

Martinovský, P., Mareš, M. 2012: Political support for nuclear power in Central Europe.International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy and Ecology 3(4): 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNGEE.2012.053572

Mir-Artigues, P. 2013: The Spanish regulation of the photovoltaic demand-side generation. Energy Policy 63: 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.019

Möckel, S. 2017a: The European ecological network “Natura 2000” and the appropriate assessment for projects and plans under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive. Nature Conservation 23: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.23.13599

Möckel, S. 2017b: The European ecological network “Natura 2000” and its derogation procedure to ensure compatibility with competing public interests. Nature Conservation 23: 87–116. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.23.13603

Nimby Forum, 2018: L' Era del Dissenso. Edizione 2017-2018 (www.nimbyforum.it)

Pareja-Alcaraz, P. 2017: Chinese investments in Southern Europe's energy sectors: Similarities and divergences in China's strategies in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Energy Policy 101: 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.034

Pettersson, M., Ek, K., Söderholm, K., Söderholm, P. 2010: Wind power planning and permitting: Comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(9): 3116–3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.008

Prieto, P.A., Hall, C.A.S. 2013: The historical, legal, political, social and economic context of solar photovoltaics in Spain. In: Spain's Photovoltaic Revolution. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9437-0_3

REN21 2019: Renewables 2018 Global Status Report A comprehensive annual overview of the state of renewable energy. Paris: REN21 Secretariat and Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.

Ricketts, B. (Ed.) et al. 2017: Coal industry across Europe. 6th edition with insights. Brussels: European Association for Coal and Lignite AISBL.

Schallenberg-Rodriguez, J. 2017: Renewable electricity support systems: Are feed-in systems taking the lead? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70: 1422–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.105

Suškevičs, N. B., Eiter, S., Martinat, S., Stober, D., Vollmer, E., de Boer, C. L., Buchecker, M. 2019: Regional variation in public acceptance of wind energy development in Europe: What are the roles of planning procedures and participation? Land Use Policy 81: 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.032

Talavera D.L., Muñoz-Cerón E., Ferrer-Rodríguez J.P., Nofuentes, G. 2016: Evolution of the cost and economic profitability of grid-connected PV investments in Spain: Long-term review according to the different regulatory frameworks approved, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 66: 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.012

Toke, D., Breukers, S., Wolsink, M. 2008: Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the difference? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021

Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Miladinova, G., Paizs, L. 2006: Energy in transition: From the iron curtain to the European Union 34: 2279–2297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.03.007

Van der Horst, D., Martinat, S., Navratil, J., Dvorak, P., Chmielova, P. 2018: What can the location of biogas plants tell us about agricultural change? A case study from the Czech Republic. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 10(1): 33–52. https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2018.002

Warren, C. R. 2014: Scales of disconnection: mismatches shaping the geographies of emerging energy landscapes. Moravian Geographical Reports 22(2): 7–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2014-0007

Williams, D. 2010: Czech Republic: A Dark Spot in a Sunny Business. Renewable Energy World. Com [online] Available from:http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/czech-republic-a-dark- spot-in-a-sunny-business

Wang, Q., Zhan, L. 2019: Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy: An empirical analysis of selected 18 European countries. Science of The Total Environment 692: 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.170

http1: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy-and-energy-union/2030-energy-strategy

http1: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/

http2: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators

http3: https://unef.es/

http4: http://www.termeszetvedelem.hu/_user/browser/File/Taj/Tajvedelmi_kezikonyv_4_kiadas_201405.pdf

http5: http://www.magyarszemle.hu/cikk/a_bos_nagymarosi_vizlepcsorendszer_tortenete

Veröffentlicht

2019-12-29

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Cikkek

Zitationsvorschlag

Diverse energy transition patterns in Central and Southern Europe: a comparative study of institutional landscapes in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, and Spain. (2019). TÁJÖKOLÓGIAI LAPOK | JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 17(Suppl.1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3571

Ähnliche Artikel

1-10 von 164

Sie können auch eine erweiterte Ähnlichkeitssuche starten für diesen Artikel nutzen.