Exploring the interconnection between sustainability, gentrification mitiga-tion, and marketing theories in johannesburg’s social housing landscape

Authors

  • Mzuchumile Makalima Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economics and Regional Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.4965

Keywords:

Urban transformation, Social housing, Green marketing, Stakeholder theory, Relationship marketing

Abstract

Urban transformation, especially in the context of social housing, demands a comprehensive and sustainable approach that addresses the interconnected challenges of funding, gentrification, and triple bottom line considerations. This study explores three marketing theories which are Stakeholder Theory, Relationship Marketing, and Green Marketing as integrated frameworks for navigating these complexities. Stakeholder Theory emphasizes inclusive decision-making and ongoing engagement with diverse stakeholders, ensuring the alignment of urban development with community needs. Relationship Marketing brings a customer-centric perspective, fostering trust and collaboration for enduring relationships between urban planners and the community. Green Marketing introduces economic, environmental, and social responsibility, promoting sustainable practices within the triple bottom line framework. Synthesizing these theories provides a holistic strategy for Johannesburg's social housing paradigm, aiming for gentrification mitigation, and a balance between economic, social, and environmental sustainability. The proposed approach serves as a blueprint for equitable and sustainable urban development globally.

 

Author Biography

  • Mzuchumile Makalima, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economics and Regional Sciences

    Mzuchumile Makalima
    PhD student
    Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences
    Doctoral School of Economics and Regional Sciences
    emzeemakakalima@gmail.com

References

Bryson, J. M. (2014). What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

Elkington, J. (2008). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. New Society Publishers.

Freeman, R. E. (2018). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.

Grönroos, C. (2006). Adopting a Service Logic for Marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 317–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470593106066794

Gummesson, E. (2022). Making Relationship Marketing Operational. International Journal of Ser-vice Industry Management, 5(5), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239410074349

Harris, R. (2021). Creeping Convergence? Twenty-First-Century Gentrification in Johannesburg and Sydney. Urban Affairs Review, 57(6), 2100–2129.

Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Harris, L. C., & Piercy, N. (2010). Principles of Marketing. Pearson Education.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (2017). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identifica-tion and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (2022). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Market-ing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252308

Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R., & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Avoiding Green Marketing Myopia: Ways to Improve Consumer Appeal for Environmentally Preferable Products. Environment: Sci-ence and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48(5), 22–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.5.22-36

Peattie, S., & Peattie, S. (2021). Ready to Fly Solo? Reducing Social Marketing’s Dependence on Commercial Marketing Theory. Marketing Theory, 3(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059310333006

Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995). Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Anteced-ents and Consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300405

Smith, M.L. (2018). Cities: The First 6,000 Years. Penguin Books.

Tallon, A. (2020). Urban Regeneration in the UK. Routledge.

Smets, P., & van Lindert, P. (2016). Sustainable housing and the urban poor. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 8(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2016.1168825

Goebel, A. (2007). Sustainable urban development? Low-cost housing challenges in South Afri-ca. Habitat International, 31(3-4), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.03.001

Osunsanmi, T., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A. E., & Ohiomah, I. (2018). Construction 4.0: Its impact towards delivering quality and sustainable houses in South Africa. In Creative Construction Confer-ence 2018 (pp. 147-156). Budapest University of Technology and Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.3311/CCC2018-020

Culwick, C., & Patel, Z. (2020). Building just and sustainable cities through government hous-ing developments. Environment and Urbanization, 32(1), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820902661

Ganiyu, B. O. (2016). Strategy to enhance sustainability in affordable housing construction in South Afri-ca (Doctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology).

Downloads

Published

2024-07-04

How to Cite

Exploring the interconnection between sustainability, gentrification mitiga-tion, and marketing theories in johannesburg’s social housing landscape. (2024). Acta Carolus Robertus, 14(1), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.4965

Similar Articles

1-10 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.