Comparative study with a set of pesticides to establish eye irritancy with HET-CAM and draize test

Authors

  • Éva Kormos University of Pannonia Georgikon Faculty, H-8360 Keszthely, Deák F. str. 16.
  • József Lehel Szent István University Faculty of Veterinary Science Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, H-1078 Budapest, István str. 2. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8021-0566
  • Klaudia Haszon University of Pannonia Georgikon Faculty, H-8360 Keszthely, Deák F. str. 16.

Keywords:

chorioallantoic membrane, in vitro, rabbit, Draize

Abstract

The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of chick embryo has been used extensively for many years in various fields of biological research, including virology, bacteriology and toxicology. The CAM is a complete tissue that responds to injury with a complete inflammatory reaction, this process similar to that induced by chemicals in the conjunctival tissue of the rabbit eye. A possible model for assessing the irritation potential of a chemical or product to such a vascularized tissue is the chorioallantoic membrane of the embryonated hen’s egg, as this is a highly vascular, thin membrane with relatively easy access for both treatment and assessment.In recent years various in vitro methods have been developed to replace the heavily criticized Draize rabbit eye test for irritation testing. One of the most studied alternative methods is the Hen’s Egg Test - Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM). In our studies a comparative screening was done with a set of pesticides to establish paralel data on in vitro (HET-CAM) and in vivo (Draize) results. In most cases good correlation was found between the HET-CAM assessment and results from the Draize rabbit eye test. The actual form of the HET-CAM test is a valuable prescreen for predicting ocular irritation potential of chemicals, and can be used to reduce the number of experimental animals. The HET-CAM test is useful as a part of a battery of tests to replace the Draize rabbit eye test.

Author Biography

  • Éva Kormos, University of Pannonia Georgikon Faculty, H-8360 Keszthely, Deák F. str. 16.

    corresponding author
    kormos.eva@2003.georgikon.hu

References

Budai, P., Lehel, J., Tavaszi, J. and Kormos, É. 2010. HET-CAM test for determining the possible eye irritancy of pesticides. Acta Vet. Hung. 58 (3) 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1556/avet.58.2010.3.9

Budai, P. and Várnagy, L. 2000. In vitro ocular irritation toxicity study of some pesticides. Acta Vet. Hung. 48. 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1556/avet.48.2000.2.10

Draize, J. H., Woodard, G. and Calvery, H. O. 1944. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of stubtance applied to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmac. 82. 377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3565(25)08751-8

Kalweit, S., Besoke, R., Gerner, I. and Spielmann, H. 1990. A national validation project of alternative methods to the Draize rabbit eye test. Toxicology in Vitro. 4 (4–5) 702–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-2333(90)90147-L

Leighton, J., Nassauer, J. and Tchao, R. 1985. The chick embryo in toxicology: an alternative to the rabbit eye. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 23 (2) 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(85)90031-6

Luepke, N. P. and Wallat, S. 1987. HET-CAM - reproducibility studies. Alternative methods in toxicology. 5. 353–363.

OECD 2002. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405: Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion. 14 pp. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.

Sina, J. F., Galer, D. M., Sussman, R. G., Gautheron, P. D., Sargent, E. V., Leong, B., Shah, P. V., Curren, R. D. and Miller, K. 1995. A collaborative evaluation of seven alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test using pharmaceutical intermediates. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 26. 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/26.1.20

Spielmann, H., Liebsh, M., Kalweit, S., Moldenhauer, F., Wirnsberger, T., Holzhütter, H. G., Schneider, B., Glaser, S., Gerner, I., Pape, W. J. W., Kreiling, R., Krauser, K., Miltenburger, H. G., Steiling, W., Luepke, N. P., Muller, N., Kreuzer, H., Murmann, P., Spengler, J., Bertram-Neis, E., Siegemund, B. and Wiebel, F. J. 1996. Results of a validation study in Germany on two in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, the HET-CAM test and the 3T3-NRU cytotoxicity test. ATLA. 24. 741–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119299602400511

Tavaszi, J. and Budai, P. 2006. Toxicity study of agrochemicals on chorioallantoic membrane of the egg. Comm. Agr. Appl. Biol. Sci. 71 (2a) 101–105.

Tavaszi, J., Budai, P., Pálovics, Á. and Kismányoki, A. 2008. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals. Comm. Agr. Appl. Biol. Sci. 73 (4) 891–896.

Walum, E. and Balls, M. et al. 1992. An integrated approach to the application of in vitro test systems to the hazard assessment of chemicals. ATLA. 20. 416. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119299202000307

Downloads

Published

2011-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kormos, Éva, Lehel, J., & Haszon, K. (2011). Comparative study with a set of pesticides to establish eye irritancy with HET-CAM and draize test. GEORGIKON FOR AGRICULTURE, 14(1), 39-51. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/gfa/article/view/6774

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>