The role of the individual in the development of innovation from the perspective of organizational operation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.3373

Keywords:

creativity, innovation, time perspective, organizational operating, competitiveness

Abstract

Innovation means in the 21st century only possible way for businesses to operate is to stay competitive in the market. Applying innovation provides an opportunity to adapt to a changing environment. Competitiveness is important not only for companies but also for nations because it is the foundation for social prosperity and continued economic growth. However, the creation of economic conditions, regulatory, infrastructural and technological factors is not enough for this, but the social individuals present in the economy also contribute greatly to this process with their thoughts and decisions. Management and corporate operations are significantly influenced by the motivation, human values, time perspectives and personality typology of employees and managers. These elements are not negligible test factors in organizational performance.

Author Biography

  • Dorottya Véghné Kohut, Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem

    Véghné Kohut Dorottya
    ORCID: 0000-0002-4122-9691
    PhD hallgató
    Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem, Vidékfejlesztés és Fenntartható Gazdaság Intézet
    e-mail: veghne.kohut.dorottya@phd.uni-mate.hu

References

Adams, J. – White, M. (2009): Time perspective in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking and body mass index. Health Psychology, 28. 1. sz. pp. 83–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.28.1.83

Amabile, T. M. (1996): Creativity in context, Westview Boulder CO

Chikán, A. – Czakó, E. (2009): Versenyben a világgal: vállalatok versenyképessége az új évezredküszöbén, Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó

Csath, M. (2010): Versenyképesség-menedzsment, Budapest, Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, pp. 16.

Csath, M. (2012): Üzletimodell – innováció, Budapest, Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, pp. 249.

Csath, M. (2020): Versenyképességi dilemmák a digitalizáció és robotizáció korában, Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest

Dombi, E. (2018): Az időperspektíva hazai mérése, személyiségvonásokkal való összefüg-géseinek vizsgálata és egy új jövőorientációs mérőeszköz kidolgozása, Szegedi Tudományegye-tem

Drake, L. – Duncan, E. – Sutherland, F. – Abernethy, C. – Henry, C. (2008): Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time and Society, 17, pp. 47–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X07086304

Drucker, P. F. (1969): The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to our Changing Society, New York, Harper & Row

Hofstede, G. – Bond, M. (1988): The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to eco-nomic growth, Organizational Dynamics, 16, pp. 4–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2011.23035

Gábor, A. (1997): Információ-menedzsment, Aula Kiadó

Guthrie, L. C. – Butler, S. C. – Ward, M. M. (2009): Time perspective and socioeconomic status: A link to socioeconomic disparities in health? Social Science & Medicine, 68. 12. sz. pp. 2145–2151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.004

Hammond, M. M. – Neff, N. L. – Farr, J. L. – Schwall, A. R. – Zhao, X. (2011): Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), pp. 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556

Hofmeister, Á. – Neumann-Bódi, E. – Kopp, M. (2008): Kulturális értékek vizsgálata a magyar társadalomban Hofstede kulturális dimenziói alapján, Semmelweis Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 365–373.

Holman, E. A. – Silver, R. C. (1998): Getting ''Stuck'' in the Past: Temporal Orientation and Coping With Trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74. 5. sz. pp. 1146–1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1146

Inglehart, R. (1997): Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Poli-tical Change 43. Societies. Princeton University Press

Kluckhohn, F. R. – Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961): Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.

Komor, L. (2011): Személyes vezetés jegyzet, Szent István Egyetem, pp. 146.

Kovács, A. (2018): Vállalati és intézményi stratégia jegyzet, Szent István Egyetem

Kruger, D. J. – Reischl, T. – Zimmerman, M. A. (2008): Time perspective as a mechanism for functional developmental adaptation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psycho-logy, 2. 1. sz. pp. 1–2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099336

Lamm, H. – Schmidt, R. W. – Trommsdorff, G. (1976): Sex and social class as determi-nants of future orientation in adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34. 3. sz. pp. 317–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080107

Larson, R. W. – Rusk, N. (2011): Intrinsic motivation and positive development, Academic Press, pp. 89–130.

Lasane, T. P. – Jones, J. M. (1999): Temporal orientation and academicgoal-setting: The mediating properties of a motivational self. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, pp. 31–44.

Lewin, K. (1942): Time Perspective and Moral. In: G. W. Lewin: Resolving Social Conf-licts, Harper And Row; New York.

Lin, Y. S. (2011): Fostering creativity through education: A conceptual framework of crea-tive pedagogy, Creative Education, 2(3), pp. 149–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23021

Luksander, A. – Mike, K. – Csite, A. (2010): Maguk urai – a magyar vállalkozó lelkialkata, A magyarországi kisvállalkozók értékvilágának néhány jellemzője, BCE Vállalatgazdaságtan Intézet Versenyképesség Kutató Központ

Mumford, D. M. – Licuanan, B. (2004): Leading for Innovation: Conclusions, issues and directions, The Leadership Quartely 15(1), pp. 163–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.010

Nurmi, J. E. (1991): How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11. 1. sz. pp. 1–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6

Phepls, E. (2008): Gazdasági kultúra és gazdasági teljesítmény. In: Progressziv politika Vol. 1 No.4, pp. 5–37.

Porter, M.E. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, The Free Press, pp. 543–573.

Robinson, K. (2011): Az alkotó tér, HVG Könyvek, Budapest

Schumpeter, J. A. (1939): Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analy-sis of the Capitalist Procces, McGraw Hill, New York

Schumpeter J. A. (1934/1980): A gazdasági fejlődés elmélete. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvki-adó, Budapest

Sommer, L. – Haug, M. (2009): The Impact of Origin on Entrepreneurial Identity, Attitu-des and International Entrepreneurial Behavior in SmE, 9th Global Conference on Busi-ness & Economics, Cambridge University, UK

Shipp, A. J. – Levasseur, L. – Fried, Y. – Rousseau, D. M. – Zimbardo, P. G. (2020): New perspectives on time perspective and temporal focus, Journal of Organizational Behavior

Tep Puthyrom – Sorakrich Maneewan – Saranya Chuathong – Matthew A. Easter | (2021): The relationship between human values and creative ideation among undergraduate students: The role of creative self-efficacy, Cogent Psychology, 8:1, 1885575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1885575

Seijts, G. H. (1998): The importance of future time perspective in theories of work moti-vation. Journal of Psychology, 132, pp. 154–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599156

Shipp, A. J. – Aeon, B. (2019): Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present, and fu-ture. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, pp. 37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005

Stolarski, M. – Bitner, J. – Zimbardo, P. G. (2011): Time perspective, emotional intelli-gence and discounting of delayed awards. Time & Society, 20, pp. 346–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X11414296

Sulaiman, I., F. – Hashim, N., C. – Sariah, S. – Hassan, A., S. – Burhan, M. – Oluwatosin, S. O. (2015): Innovativeness of Creative Thinking for Value Creation, Journal of Education & Social Policy 2(3), 1–12

Véghné Kohut, D. (2019): Versenyképességre ható innovációs hajlandósági index az egyé-ni időperspektíva szempontjából, Szent István Egyetem

Webster, J. D. (2011): A new measure of time perspective: initial psychometric findings for the balanced time perspective scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43.2. sz. pp. 111–118.

Weiss, S. D. – Legrand, C. (2011): Innovative Intelligence. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd.

Zhang, J. W. – Howell, R. T. (2011): Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, pp. 1261–1266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021

Zimbardo, P. G. – Boyd, J. N. (1999): Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable indivi-dual-differences etric, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77.6. sz. pp. 1271–1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2

Zimbardo, P. G. – Warren, M. L. (2008): Time to create: investigating the dispositional and situational determinants of creativity, Kiadás előtt álló kézirat

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

The role of the individual in the development of innovation from the perspective of organizational operation. (2022). Acta Carolus Robertus, 12(Különszám), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.3373