In vivo classification of two closely related species of mice, mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus) and  house mouse (Mus musculus)

Boróka Bárdos; Bianka Kovács; Nagy István; Vilmos Altbäcker

doi:10.31914/aak.2656

Authors

Boróka Bárdos Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Kaposvár Campus
Bianka Kovács Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Kaposvár Campus
István Nagy Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Kaposvár Campus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0247-6638
Vilmos Altbäcker Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Kaposvár Campus https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7592-1232

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.2656

Keywords:

small mammal studies, live-trapping, classification

Abstract

Correct identification of similar, closely related species with overlapping distribution is a crucial point in field biology. In small mammal studies, species identification is particularly problematic in population studies using trapping where live animals need to be identified. The aim of our research was to develop a method making the classification of the two Hungarian mouse species, mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) possible based on morphometric characters. The basis to obtain reference data was the captive populations of caged animals housed in our laboratory where the true species classification was known for every animal. Body weight, body length, tail length, and tail diameter were measured for 56-56 individuals from both species. From these measurements the ratio of the body length/tail length was also calculated. Besides, the sex and age of these animals were also recorded. Data analysis consisted of stepwise discriminant procedure and discriminant analysis, respectively. The stepwise discriminant procedure restricted the morphometric characters to the ratio of the body length/tail length and tail diameter. Performing the discriminant analysis to these body measures a perfect classification was obtained even using cross-validation. Thus, applying the obtained discriminant function to the classification of any live trapped mice is feasible.

References

Auffray J. C., Britton-Davidian, J. (2012). The house mouse and its relatives: systematics and taxono-my - In: Macholán, M., Baird, J. E., Munclinger, P. and Piálek, J. (eds): Evolution of the house mouse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139044547.003

Bihari, Z. (2004). A güzüegér (Mus spicilegus) életmódjának sajátságai és mezőgazdasági jelentősége. - Növényvédelem 40, 245–250.

Bihari, Z., Csorba, G., Heltai, M. (2007). Magyarország emlőseinek atlasza. - Budapest, Kossuth Kiadó, 193-194.

Carlsen, M. (1993). Migrations of Mus musculus musculus in Danish farmland. - Zeitschrift für Sau-getierkunde 58, 172-180.

Cserkész, T., Gubányi, A., Farkas, J. (2008). Distinguishing Mus spicilegus from Mus musculus (Ro-dentia Muridae) by using cranial measurements. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hun-garicae. 54, 305-318-

Demeter, A., Rácz, G. and Csorba, G. (1996). Identification of house mice (Mus musculus) and mound-building mice (Mus spicilegus) using distance and landmark data. - In: Advances in Morphomet-rics (Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. and Slice, D. E. eds). Plenum Press, New York. 359–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2_30

Horner, E. B. (1954). Arboreal adaptations of Peromyscus with special reference to use of tail. - Con-tributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan 61, 1-85.

Lindquist, E. S., Aquadro C. F., McClearn, D. and McGowan, K. (2003). Field identification of the mice Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis and P. maniculatus gracilis in central New York. - Canadi-an FieldNaturalist 117(2), 184-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v117i2.680

Musser, G. G. and Carleton, M. D. (1993). Family Muridae. In: Mammal species of the world - (Wilson, D. E. and Reeder, D. M. eds). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. 501–755.

Petényi, S. J. (1888). Természetrajzi Füzetek. - Budapest, 5, 114.

Simeonovska-Nikolova, D. (2000). Strategies in open field behaviour of Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus musculus. Belgian Journal of Zoology 130, 119–124.

SAS Institute Inc. (2013). The STEPDISC Procedure. SAS/STAT 13.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC.

SAS Institute Inc. (2015). The DISCRIM Procedure. SAS/STAT 14.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC.

Slabova, M., Frynta, D. (2007). Morphometric variation in nearly unstudied mammal: The non-commensal house-mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) in the Near East and Northen Africa. Zo-ologischer Anzeiger – A journal of Comparative Zoology. 30, 91-101.

Sokolov, V. E., Kotenkova, E. V. and Ljalukchina, S. I. (1990). Bioligija domovoj i kurganchikovoj mysej (The biology of the house mouse and mound-building mouse) Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

Sokolov, V. E., Kotenkova, E. V. and Michailenko, A. G. (1998). Mus spicilegus. - Mammalian Species 592, 1–6.