Extensive versus modern animal husbandry – pros and cons

Authors

  • Boris Antunović University of J.J. Strossmayer, Faculty of Agriculture, 31000 Osijek, Trg svetog Trojstva 3., Croatia
  • Gordana Kralik University of J.J. Strossmayer, Faculty of Agriculture, 31000 Osijek, Trg svetog Trojstva 3., Croatia
  • Wiebke Wellbrock Wageningen University, Rural Sociology Group, 6707 KN Wageningen, Hollandseweg 1., Netherlands
  • Bela Njari University of Zagreb, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 10000 Zagreb, Heinzelova 55., Croatia
  • Mirjana Baban University of J.J. Strossmayer, Faculty of Agriculture, 31000 Osijek, Trg svetog Trojstva 3., Croatia
  • Pero Mijić University of J.J. Strossmayer, Faculty of Agriculture, 31000 Osijek, Trg svetog Trojstva 3., Croatia
  • Zvonimir Steiner University of J.J. Strossmayer, Faculty of Agriculture, 31000 Osijek, Trg svetog Trojstva 3., Croatia
  • Džemil Hajrić Council of Ministries, Food Safety Agency of B&H, 88000 Mostar, Ulica dr. Ante Starčevića bb, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Keywords:

extensive, intensive, animal husbandry, model, farming

Abstract

Food industry has significantly started affecting eco-system and it is more and more clear that we cannot only produce. It has become more important how we produce, as well as how to produce food with economical usage of row materials and energy with respect to the environment. Nowadays, we face many facts that prove the intensive animal husbandry (IAH) is not so modern anymore and that we have to search back for certain elements from the extensive animal husbandry (EAH) in order to reactivate them in cost-efficient way and with regard to preserving biodiversity, rural development, protection of natural heritage, traditions and animal welfare. It has been identified that upraising of EAH in the future depends much on land support, land-use management, climate, economical development of each country, education and motivation of farmers, as well as on the possibilities to be competitive on the market. The maintenance system has to be cost-effective for the owner to enjoy the occupation of EAH and companionship of the animals. Therefore, EAH could be sustainable only where public attitudes are positive and appropriate premiums can be justified so that the systems remain viable. Product quality and origin should give added value to such production. Research and development should support such advancements and the adoption of new reasonable production systems serving animal welfare.

Author Biography

  • Boris Antunović, University of J.J. Strossmayer, Faculty of Agriculture, 31000 Osijek, Trg svetog Trojstva 3., Croatia

    corresponding author
    boris.antunovic@pfos.hr

References

Alvard, M. S., Kuznar, L. (2001). Deferred harvests: The transition from hunting to animal husbandry. American Anthropologist. 103. 2. 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.295

Antunović, B. (2000). Post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome – a new disease of weaned piglets. Veterinarska stanica. 31. 1. 27–33.

Antunović, B., Kralik, G., Margeta, V. (2004a). Adjustment of swine housing conditions to EU member countries legislation. Krmiva. 46. 313–320.

Antunović, B., Kralik, G., Florijančić, T. (2004b). Ethological and ecological aspects of pig production in Croatia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. Suppl. 1. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas-s.2004.1.19388

Banović, K., Poljak, V., Baban, M., Florijančić, T., Ljubičić, M., Antunović, B. (2008). Unauthorised usage of veterinary drugs as a potential risk to human and animal health. 16th International Symphosium „Animal Science Days“. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. Supplement 2. 33–40. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas-s.2008.2.19201

BioVision (2010). Animal Husbandry and Beekeeping. Introduction to Animal Husbandry. Infonet-BioVision, Switzerland.

Brambell, F. W. R. (1967). Report of the Committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. HMSO Cmnd., London, GB.

Ding, H. A., Wang, K., Wu, W. L. (2007). Problems and strategies for sustainable development of farming and animal husbandry in the Agro-Pastoral Transition Zone in Northern China (APTZNC). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 14. 4. 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469739

Döpfer, D., Morlán, J. B. (2008). The paradox of modern animal husbandry and lameness. The Veterinary Journal. 175. 2. 153–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.013

EC (1999). Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens (Official Journal L 203 of 3 August 1999) Amended by: Council Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 of 14 April 2003 (Official Journal L 122 of 16.05.2003).

EC (2006). Screening Report – Croatia. Chapter 11. Agriculture and Rural Development, 17/07/2006.

Edelstein-Keshet, L. (1988). Mathemical models in biology. Birkhauser Mathematics Series, McGraw-Hill Inc., Boston Massachussets, USA.

Farm Animal Welfare Council (2007). Five Freedoms.

Fuchs, C. (2001). Economic efficiency of intensive and extensive animal husbandry.

Praktische Tierarzt. 82. 8. 578.

IFOAM (2005). The IFOAM Basic Standard. The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movement, Bonn, Germany.

Matthews, L. R. (1996). Animal welfare and sustainability of production under extensive conditions: a non-EU perspective. Applied Animal behaviour Science. 49. 1. 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00666-4

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management (2006). SAPARD Programme - Agriculture and Rural Development Plan, 2005–2006. Croatian Government.

Owens, R. C. Jr. (2008). Antimicrobial stewardship: concepts and strategies in the 21st century. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 61. 1. 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.02.012

Pfeuffer, M., Sambraus, H. H. (2006). Animal husbandry in the Apuseni mountains in Romania I. Tieraerztliche Umschau. 61. 6. 311–315.

Porcher, J. (2003). Well-being and suffering in animal husbandry: Living conditions at the workplace of people and animals. Sociologie du Travail. 45. 1. 27–43. https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.30846

Saarinen, K., Jantunen, J. (2005). Grassland butterfly fauna under traditional animal husbandry: Contrasts in diversity in mown meadows and grazed pastures. Biodiversity & Conservation. 14. 13. 3201–3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0387-7

Schumacher, U. (1998). Ecological animal husbandry – development in production and marketing (e.g. Bioland). Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 105. (8 Special Issue SI). 301–306.

Thurston, J. (2008). The CAP and Europe’s subsistence farmers. CAP Health check. Towards better European farming, food and rural policies.

Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bock, B., Roe, E. (2008). European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 113. (Special Issue SI). 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008

Vira, V., Narnicka, K. (2003). Semi-subsistence farming in Latvia: Its production function and what will be the impact of proposed EU support. Stockholm School of Economics in Riga. Working Papers. 14. 49.

Wellbrock, W., Oostig, S. J., Bock, B. B., Antunović, B., Kralik, G. (2009). Harmonisation of welfare standards for the protection of pigs with the EU rules: the case of Croatia. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 8. (Suppl. 3). 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s3.21

Wellbrock, W, Antunović, B., Oosting, S. J., Bock, B. B. (2010). Smallholder pig farming in Croatia: Destined to become extinct or worth saving? Workshop 2.4 "Social impacts of farming system shifts" of the 9th European IFSA Symposium. Vienna, 4–7 July 2010.

Downloads

Published

2010-10-15

How to Cite

Antunović, B., Kralik, G., Wellbrock, W., Njari, B., Baban, M., Mijić, P., Steiner, Z., & Hajrić, D. (2010). Extensive versus modern animal husbandry – pros and cons. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 14(2), 7-16. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/aak/article/view/1947

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>