Személyre szabott fejlesztési lehetőségek a felsőoktatásban: Jelentés egy egyéniesített fejlesztési módszer kipróbálásáról

Edina Dombi

doi:10.17165/TP.2016.3-4.6

Authors

Edina Dombi SZTE JGYPK Tanító- és Óvóképző Intézet, Alkalmazott Pedagógia és Pszichológia Tanszék

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17165/TP.2016.3-4.6

Abstract

As a result of the cooperation between the University of Szeged, Institute of Kindergarten and Lower-Primary and the Qualitas T&G Kft., within the framework of TÁMOP 4.1.2.B.2-13 / 1-2013-0008 Mentor(h)áló 2.0 project, individual development of students was carried out. Altogether 18 students of the Institute took part in the program. Our aim was to help these students to realize those skills and areas of their personality which should be developed. This study aims at presenting the process of creating the program for individual skills development. All of the students volunteered for this program and their anonimity was assured. The structure of the development and the documentation was the same for everyone. Measuring the students’ behavioral competences (RaDAr) provided the input of the process (Barath, 2013). Tailor-made techniques and practices provided the basis of the mentoring process.

Author Biography

Edina Dombi, SZTE JGYPK Tanító- és Óvóképző Intézet, Alkalmazott Pedagógia és Pszichológia Tanszék

pszichológus, egyetemi tanársegéd
edinadombi@jgypk.u-szeged.hu

References

Baráth, T. (2013). Methodology of the competency framework development. In: Schratz, M. és mtsai, The Art and Science of Leading a School. National report of the project: International Co-operation for School Leadership Involving Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden. (pp. 31–65.) Budapest: Komáromi Nyomda és Kiadó Kft.

Busch, J. W. (1985). Mentoring in graduate schools of education: Mentors’ perceptions. American Educational Research Journal, vol. 22. pp. 257–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022002257

Campbell, T. A. – Campbell, D. E. (1997). Faculty/student mentor program: effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, vol. 38. no. 6. pp. 727–742.

Crisp, G., – Cruz, I. (2010). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Measure of “Mentoring” Among Undergraduate Students Attending a Hispanic Serving Institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 9. no. 3. pp. 232–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192710371982

DuBois, D. L .– Holloway, B. E. – Valentine, J. C. – Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 30. no. 2. pp. 157–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014628810714

Fagenson, E. A. (1989). The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non-protégés. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 10. pp. 309–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030100403

Jacobi, M. (1991): Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, vol. 61. pp. 505–532.doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061004505

Kasprisin, C. A. – Single, P. B. – Single, R. M. – Muller, C. B. (2003). Building a better bridge: testing e-training to improve e-mentoring programmes in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring, vol. 11. no. 1. pp. 67–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126032000054817

Koch, C. – Johnson, W. B. (2000). Documenting Benefits of Undergraduate Mentoring. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, vol. 20. no. 4. pp. 172–175.

Pusztai, E (2009). A coaching szerepe a szervezetfejlesztésben. IME, 8. évf. 2. sz. pp. 35–37.

Santos, S. J. – Regadas, E. T. (2002). Latinos in Higher Eduacation: An Evaluation of a University Faculty Mentoring Program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 1. no. 1. pp. 40–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192702001001004

Wilson, Z. S. – Holmes, L. – deGravelles, K. – Sylvain, M. R. – Batiste, L. – Johnson, M. – McGuire, S. Y. – Pang, S. S. – Warner, I. M. (2012). Hierarchical Mentoring: A Transformative Strategy for Improving Diversity and Retention in Undergraduate STEM Disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 21. no. 1. pp. 148–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9292-5

Xu, Y. – Hartman, S. – Uribe, G. – Mencke, R. (2001). The effects of peer tutoring on undergraduate students’ final examination scores in mathematics. Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 32. no. 1. pp. 22–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2001.10850123