Side notes to a design competition

The result of the City Hall Park open space design competition

Authors

  • Imre Jámbor Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences – Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden and Open Space Design https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0696-1462

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.3391

Abstract

Budapest has a lot of attractive public squares and parks, but so far it has lacked a central main square of outstanding importance, that could function as a kind of agora. Many people say that the real main square of Budapest is the section of the Danube from the Margaret Bridge to the Liberty Bridge, which is 400 meters wide on average and is framed by the magnificent view of the waterfront cityscape of Pest and Buda. Due to the central location of the area, and from the point of view of the landscape, this is true, however, the water surface of the Danube cannot, of course, fulfil the function of a classical forum, the urban main square for the use by the public. Hősök tere (HeroesSquare) which could function as the city's main square due to its design, size and spacious pedestrian surfaces, is far from the city centre and, carved out of the green space of the City Park, is part of the former urban fringe. Due to the bordering museum buildings, it can rather be considered as a cultural and tourism facility or due to its size, a suitable venue for events and demonstrations, however, it is not a main square in the classical sense

Author Biography

  • Imre Jámbor, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences – Institute of Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning and Garden Art, Budapest, Department of Garden and Open Space Design

    CSc, DLA Professor Emeritus
    E-mail: jambor.imre.an@gmail.com

Published

2022-11-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Side notes to a design competition: The result of the City Hall Park open space design competition. (2022). 4D Journal of Landscape Architecture and Garden Art, 65, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.36249/4d.3391