The Shortening of Sustainable Supply Chains in Hungary and Europe

Authors

  • Zoltán Tamás Szabó Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Földtudományok Doktori Iskola
  • Chuluunbaatar Erdenebayar University of Debrecen, Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business
  • B. Levente Alpek Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Földrajzi és Földtudományi Intézet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.4858

Keywords:

Hungary, European Union, supply chains, COVID-19, sustainability

Abstract

The study examines the impact of supply disruptions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy security challenges primarily resulting from the Russian-Ukrainian war on the re-evaluation of sustainability considerations and the European green transition, especially regarding the potential strategic importance of renewable energy sources. The justification for the shortening of the long supply chains can be argued from the perspectives of supply security and sustainability. Furthermore, the economic validation of sustainability considerations is receiving increasing attention in professional discourse, sparking public debate. One of the primary tensions underlying these polemics is the conflict between short-term economic interests and long-term sustainability and environmental considerations. These interests often contradict each other, and the ongoing professional debate surrounding the shortening of supply chains provides relevant insight into these conflicts. However, the supply disruptions resulting from COVID-19 have re-emphasized the importance of supply security, prompting many economic actors to reconsider their supply strategies. The growing significance of supply security is evident in surveys, expert analyses, and economic strategic documents. The energy challenges posed by the Russian-Ukrainian war have, in turn, prompted EU policymakers to reform the energy strategy. The risks associated with energy security highlighted the vulnerabilities stemming from dependency on external fossil-based energy sources. This article aims to answer the question of how short-term economic interests and longer-term sustainability goals can be reconciled in light of the supply disruptions experienced during COVID-19 and the Russian-Ukrainian war. It does this through a literature review of professional debates and relevant expert analyses, strategic EU documents, and by examining key indicators of the EU's energy dependence. The restructuring of the EU's energy policy demonstrates the feasibility of rapidly implementing major transformations in complex systems when necessary. Beyond facilitating professional discourse, the experiences from these events can also boost the European green transition, as a green Europe built on its renewable resources can be more resilient against challenges of the future. This is in line with both economic and environmental objectives. The main conclusion of the research is that the EU's successful transition to renewable energy sources, in addition to achieving environmental goals, can contribute to reducing external risks through the alleviation of energy dependence. Furthermore, energy security provided by its own energy sources facilitates the growth of the real economy and underpins the EU's geopolitical position.

Author Biographies

  • Zoltán Tamás Szabó, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Földtudományok Doktori Iskola

    Szabó Zoltán Tamás
    PhD-hallgató
    Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Földtudományok Doktori Iskola
    H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság u. 6.
    zoltasz@gmail.com

  • Chuluunbaatar Erdenebayar, University of Debrecen, Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business

    Chuluunbaatar Erdenebayar
    PhD student
    Ihrig Károly Doctoral School of Management and Business, University of Debrecen,
    4032 Debrecen.
    erdenebayar.ch@gmail.com

  • B. Levente Alpek, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Földrajzi és Földtudományi Intézet

    Dr. Alpek B. Levente, PhD
    egyetemi adjunktus
    Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Földrajzi és Földtudományi Intézet
    H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság u. 6.
    alpeklevente@gamma.ttk.pte.hu

References

ALICKE, K. – AZCUE, X. – BARRIBALL, E. (2020): Supply chain recovery in coronavirus times – plan for now and the future. https://www.McKINSEY.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/supply-chain-recovery-in-coronavirus-times-plan-for-now-and-the-future#. (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

BAKER MCKENZIE (2020): Beyond COVID-19 Supply Chain Resilience Holds Key to recovery. https://www.bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/insight/publications/2020/04/covid19-global-economy.pdf?la=en (Accessed: 2023.06.27.)

BOTOS, SZ. – FELFÖLDI, J. – VÁRALLYAI, L. – PÉNTEK, Á. – SZILÁGYI, R. (2018): Analysis the advanced ict usage of the hungarian sme sector for preparing a domestic agri-food research. Apstract - Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce Vol. 11. No. (3-4) pp. 147–154. https://doi.org/10.19041/APSTRACT/2017/3-4/20

BRENTON, P. – FERRANTINO, M. J. – MALISZEWSKA, M. (2022): Reshaping Global Value Chains in Light of COVID-19: Implications for Trade and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. 167p. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37032 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO (Accessed: 2023.09.30.)

BRUNEL, C. (2017): Pollution Offshoring and Emission Reductions in European and US Manufacturing. In: Environmental and Resource Economics 68(3): pp.621–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0035-1

CAMBRIDGE ECONOMICS (2018): Oil Dependency in the EU. https://www.camecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2018-TE-Oil-Dependency-report.pdf (Accessed: 2023.05.22)

CHOI, J. Y. – YU, E. S. H. (2018): International Outsourcing, Environmental Costs, and Welfare. In: Asian Development Bank Institute, Working Paper No. 848. 16p. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/428606/adbi-wp848.pdf (Accessed: 2023.06.16.)

CZIFRUSZ, M. (2021): A COVID-19-válság és a térbeli munkamegosztás változásai Magyarországon. Területi Statisztika, 61(3), pp. 320–336. https://doi.org/10.15196/TS610303

EBRD – EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (2022a): In the shadow of the war – The economic fallout from the war on Ukraine. EBRD, London. https://www.ebrd.com/rep-ukraine-war-310322.pdf (Accessed: 2023.10.12.)

DE VET, J. M. – NIGOHOSYAN, D. – NÚÑEZ FERRER, J. – GROSS, A-N. – KUEHL, S. – FLICKENSCHILD, M. (2021): Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on EU industries. ISBN 978-92-846-7937-9. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662903/IPOL_STU(2021)662903_EN.pdf (Accessed: 2023.06.27.)

EBRD – EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (2022b): Business Unusual. EBRD, London. ISBN:978-1-898802-54-9 https://www.ebrd.com/documents/oce/transition-report-202223-pdf.pdf (Accessed: 2023.10.13.)

EUGO (2022): Doing Business in Hungary. http://eugo.gov.hu/doing-business-hungary (Accessed: 2023.06.27.)

EUROPEAN COMISSION (2020a): Making Europe’s businesses future-ready: A New Industrial Strategy for a globally competitive, green and digital Europe. Press Release, EUROPEAN COMISSION. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_416 (Accessed: 2023.06.27.)

EUROPEAN COMISSION (2020b): A New Industrial Strategy for Europe. https://commission.europa.eu/document/a0dfe54f-f8bb-46f7-8828-d58c1cd8efa8_en (Accessed: 2023.06.27.)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022c): REPowerEU: A plan to rapidly reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_3131 (Accessed: 2023.10.14.)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022d): Recovery and Resilience Facility. https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en#the-recovery-and-resilience-facility (Accessed: 2023.10.14.)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022e): REPowerEU at a glance. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en (Accessed: 2023.10.15.)

EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2023): Impact of sanctions on the Russian economy. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/impact-sanctions-russian-economy/ (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY, EEA (2023): Share of Energy Consumption from Renewable Sources in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/share-of-energy-consumption-from (Accessed: 2023.10.15.)

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE (2021): Post Covid-19 value chains: options for reshoring production back to Europe in a globalised economy. ISBN 978-92-846-7832-7 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/653626/EXPO_STU(2021)653626_EN.pdf (Accessed: 2023.06.27.) doi: 10.2861/118324

EUROSTAT (2023a): Oil and petroleum products - a statistical overview. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Oil_and_petroleum_products_-_a_statistical_overview#Imports_of_crude_oil (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

EUROSTAT (2023b): Energy imports dependency. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/NRG_IND_ID__custom_7659462/default/table?lang=en (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

EUROSTAT (2023c): Imports of oil and petroleum products by partner country https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/NRG_TI_OIL__custom_7659503/default/table?lang=en (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND ENERGY OF GERMANY [BMWI] (2019): Industrial strategy 2030. Made in Germany. Federal Ministry for EconomicAffairs and Energy (BMWi). https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Industry/industrial-strategy-2030.html (Accessed: 2023.06.18)

GELEI, A. (2010): Az ellátási lánc menedzsmentje. In: Czakó Erzsébet – Reszegi László (Eds.) (2010): Nemzetközi vállalatgazdaságtan. pp. 413–441. Alinea Kiadó, Budapest.

GEREFFI, G. – LUO, X. (2014): Risks and opportunities of participation in global value chains. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6847. World Bank. 25p https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6847

GYÖRGY, L. (2019): Creating Balance – The Mission of Economic Policy. Budapest, Századvég Foundation. 295p ISBN 978-615-5164-46-0. pp.154–165.

HARVARD UNIVERSITY (2023): Center for International Development: The Atlas of Economic Complexity. https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

HAUSMANN, R. (2020): A globális ellátási láncok átalakulása a feldolgozóiparban a koronavírus-járvány következtében. HITELINTÉZETI SZEMLE / FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC REVIEW, 19 (3). pp. 130–152. ISSN 1588–6883 https://doi.org/10.25201/HSZ.19.3.130153

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (2022): Hungary 2022. IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/hungary-2022, License: CC BY 4.0 (Accessed: 2023.10.04.)

JAVORCIK, B. (2020): ‘Global supply chains will not be the same in the post-COVID-19 world‘, in Baldwin, R and S Evenett (Eds.), COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work, CEPR Press, Paris & London. pp.111–116. ISBN: 978-1-912179-30-5 https://cepr.org/publications/books-and-reports/covid-19-and-trade-policy-why-turning-inward-wont-work (Accessed: 2023.10.13.)

KIM, M. – CHAI, S. (2017a): The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective. In: International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 187 pp. 42–52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.007

KIM, M. – CHAI, S. (2017b): Implementing Environmental Practices for Accomplishing Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management. Sustainability, Volume 9, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071192

KLAUSMANN-DINYA, A. – DINYA, L. (2021). Társadalmi marketing feladatok a komplex fenntarthatósági kihívások kapcsán. Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 9(2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.2908

KOLTAI, T. (2006): Termelésmenedzsment. Typotex, Budapest. 279 p

KOVÁCS, S. – LUX, G. – PÁGER, B. (2017): A középvállalatok szerepe a feldolgozóiparban: egy magyarországi kutatás első eredményei. Területi Statisztika. 57. évf. 1. sz. pp. 52–75. https://doi.org/10.15196/TS570103

LENGYEL, P. – BAI, A. – GABNAI, Z. – MUSTAFA, O.M.A. – BALOGH, P. – PÉTER, E. – TÓTH-KASZÁS, N. – NÉMETH, K. (2021): Development of the Concept of Circular Supply Chain Management—A Systematic Review. Processes, 9(10), 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101740

LUX, G. (2017a): A külföldi működőtőke által vezérelt iparfejlődési modell és határai Közép-Európában. Tér és Társadalom, 31(1) sz. pp. 30–52. https://doi.org/10.17649/tet.31.1.2801

LUX, G. (2017b): Újraiparosodás Közép-Európában. Studia Regionum. Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest - Pécs. 327p

MCKIBBIN, W. – FERNANDO, R. (2020): The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. In: Asian Economic Papers 20(2) pp.1–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00796 https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20200302_COVID19.pdf (Accessed: 2023.10.15.)

MCKINSEY & COMPANY (2020): Repülőrajt – A magyar gazdaság növekedési pályája 2030-ig. McKINSEY & Company, Budapest. https://www.McKINSEY.com/~/media/McKINSEY/Locations/Europe%20and%20Middle%20East/Hungary/ Our%20Insights/Flying%20start%20Powering%20up%20Hungary%20for%20a%20decade%20of%20growth/McKINSEY-Hungary-2030-Report-HU.pdf (Accessed: 2023.10.03.)

MIROUDOT, S. (2020): Resilience versus robustness in global value chains: Some policy implications‘, in Baldwin, R and S Evenett (eds), COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won’t Work, CEPR Press, Paris & London. pp.117–130. ISBN: 978-1-912179-30-5 https://cepr.org/publications/books-and-reports/covid-19-and-trade-policy-why-turning-inward-wont-work (Accessed: 2023.10.14.).

MOLLENKOPF, D. – STOLZE, H. J. – TATE, W. L. – MURFIELD, M. L. (2010): Green, lean, and global supply chains. In: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 40, No. 1–2. pp. 14–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011018028

OECD (2021): Towards a more resource-efficient and circular economy – The role of the G20. A background report prepared for the 2021 G20 Presidency of Italy. https://www.oecd.org/environment/waste/OECD-G20-Towards-a-more-Resource-Efficient-and-Circular-Economy.pdf (Accessed: 2023.06.27.)

OLÁH, J. – ERDEI, E. – POPP, J. (2021): Fenntartható folyékony bioüzemanyagok kilátásai. Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 9(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.2648

OLÁH, J. – POPP, J. (2022). Sustainable Liquid Biofuels (Bioethanol, Biodiesel) Production and Their Multifunctional Impacts. Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.3276

PECK, H. (2007): Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 9(2), pp.127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560600673578

PETERSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS (2023): https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/russias-war-ukraine-sanctions-timeline (Accessed: 2023.05.22)

POUNDER, P. (2013): A Review of Supply Chain Management and Its Main External Influential Factors. Supply Chain Forum. Vol. 14 No. 3. pp. 42–50. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3787.3289

RABBI, M.F. – POPP, J. – MÁTÉ, D.– KOVÁCS, S. (2022): Energy Security and Energy Transition to Achieve Carbon Neutrality. Energies 2022, 15(21), 8126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218126

RADOVIĆ-MARKOVIĆ, M. – BRNJAS, Z. – SIMOVIĆ, V. (2019): The impact of globalization on entrepreneurship. Economic Analysis, 52(1), pp.56–68. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.19.52.12.pp56-68

REUTERS (2022): Germany fires up extra coal power capacity to plug winter supplies. November 2, 2022. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/germany-fires-up-extra-coal-power-capacity-plug-winter-supplies-2022-11-02/ (Accessed: 2023.10.14.)

SHIH, W. (2020a): Is it time to rethink globalized supply chains? MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/is-it-time-to-rethink-globalized-supply-chains/ (Accessed: 2023.05.23.)

SHIH, W. (2020b): Global Supply Chains in a Post-Pandemic World: Companies Need to Make Their Networks More Resilient. Here’s How. Harvard Business Review Vol. 98, No. 5 (September–October 2020). pp.82–89. https://hbr.org/2020/09/global-supply-chains-in-a-post-pandemic-world (Accessed: 2023.06.20.)

SZALAVETZ, A. (2018a): Úton az energiahatékonyságtól az energiarugalmasságig. Magyarországi iparvállalatok tapasztalatai. Vezetéstudomány, 49(6) pp. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2018.06.02

SZALAVETZ, A. (2018b): Digitális átalakulás és fenntarthatóság. In: KÖZGAZDASÁGI SZEMLE, 65 (10). pp. 1067–1088. ISSN 0023-4346. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2018.10.1067

TSENG, M. L.– WU, K. J.– HU, J.– WANG, C. H. (2018): Decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainties. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 205. pp. 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.

VAKHAL, P. (2020). Magyar kis- és középvállalkozások a globális értékláncokban. Külgazdaság, 64, 30–59. https://doi.org/10.47630/KULG.2020.64.5-6.30

VÖRÖS, J. (2018): Termelés- és szolgáltatásmenedzsment [Digital Edition] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2018. ISBN: 978 963 454 216 2 https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634542162, (Accessed: 2023.10.13.)

WILLIAMSON, P. (2021): De-Globalisation and Decoupling: Post-COVID-19 Myths versus Realities. Management and Organization Review, 17 (1): pp.29–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.80

ZWOLINSKI, M. (2007): Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 689–727. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20071745

Downloads

Published

2023-10-17

Issue

Section

Cikk szövege

How to Cite

The Shortening of Sustainable Supply Chains in Hungary and Europe. (2023). Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 11(2), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.4858