Shore assessment at the gravel pit ponds of Délegyháza

Authors

  • Ágnes Sallay Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Preservation and Reclamation Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Planning and Regional Development, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi str. 35-43.
  • Zsombor Boromisza Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Preservation and Reclamation Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Planning and Regional Development, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi str. 35-43.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3899

Keywords:

habitat assessment, landscape planning, landscape preservation, environmental protection, lakeshore zone

Abstract

In the framework of a professional co-operation initiated by the Environment Protection Information Club Nonprofit Association (abbreviation of its Hungarian name: KVIK), it was the Middle Danube Valley Inspectorate for Environmental Protection, Nature Conservation and Water Management, as well as the Departments of Landscape Preservation and Reclamation and of Landscape Planning and Regional Development of Corvinus University of Budapest, which began to assess the shore-zone of the gravel pit ponds at Délegyháza in May 2009. The first assessment was made on the gravel pit pond No. I. (Lake Gizella), followed by that of the lake No. V. in September 2009, whereas the students make survey of a shore-zone of pond No. II. in the semesters of 2010-2011.
Délegyháza has 300 ha water-surface on its territory disposing of a recreational potential that has not been utilized so far. The great part of the area consists of the lake-system, the neighbouring water-shore associations as well as of the sand-, gravel- and dead rock piles, taken out during mining. The landscape and natural potentials of shore zones significantly define the ecological condition and utilisation opportunities of standing waters, yet, monitoring of these zones are often played down compared to the processes in the water-body and the catchment research. Having in mind the functions that determine the condition of the whole water body (e.g. special habitat, bio filter- and mechanical protection’ function of the near nature riparian vegetation, attracting factor of tourism, place to reach the water-body, etc.), and the procedures influencing same ( e.g. fluctuating water level, shore-regulation, built-in area, obliteration of marshland vegetation, erosion) it is absolutely necessary to create shore-zones with conscious, purposeful and complex approach. To establish a proper basis for the planning, landscaping, and management, an investigation and evaluation methodology is needed by which the special features of the shores can be revealed and further decisions can be founded.

Author Biographies

  • Ágnes Sallay, Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Preservation and Reclamation Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Planning and Regional Development, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi str. 35-43.

    agnes.sallay@uni-corvinus.hu

  • Zsombor Boromisza, Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Preservation and Reclamation Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Landscape Planning and Regional Development, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi str. 35-43.

    zsombor.boromisza@uni-corvinus.hu

References

Boromisza Zs., Csima P. 2008: A Velencei-tó parti sávjának értékelése a partalakítás és a tájterhelhetőség szempontjából. pp.125–132. In. Csima Péter – Dublinszki-Boda Brigitta: Tájökológiai kutatások. BCE Tájvédelmi és Tájrehabilitációs Tanszék. Budapest.

Boromisza Zs. 2010: Állóvizek parti sávjának tájvizsgálati és tájértékelési módszerei. pp. 193–199. In. Sallay Ágnes (szerk.): Ormos Imre Tudományos Ülésszak. LOV 2009. Tájépítészeti Tanulmányok. 4D könyvek. BCE Tájépítészeti Kar. Budapest.

Délegyházi Kavicsbányatavak – Környezetvédelmi felülvizsgálat (2008). R. K. Regionális Környezetvédelmi Kft. Salgótarján. 70 p.

Délegyháza község településszerkezeti terve és helyi építési szabályzata (2005). PESTTERV – Pest Megyei Terület-, Település-, Környezet Tervező és Tanácsadó Kft. Budapest.

Felföldy L. 1981: A vizek környezettana. Általános hidrobiológia. Mezőgazdasági Kiadó. Budapest. pp. 73–80.

Liukonnen, B., Hagley, C. 1996: Shoreland volunteer Guidebook. Organizing a volunteer training program. University of Minnesota Water Center. St. Paul. 24 p.

Mester Zs. 2000, (szerk.): Kis-tó projekt 2000. Agroinform Kiadó. Budapest-Eger. 123 p.

Minnesota’s Sensitive Lakeshore Identification Manual: a conservation strategy for Minnesota lakeshores (2009). State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Division of Ecological Resources. St.Paul. 62. p.

Ninioja, R., Holopainen, A.-L., Lepistö, L., Rämö, A., Turkka, J. 2004: Public participation in monitoring programmes as a toolfor lakeshore monitoring: the example of Lake Pyhäjärvi, Karelia, Eastern Finland. Limnologica 34. pp. 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80035-5

Ostendorp, W., Dienst, M., Jacoby, H., Kramer, I., Peintinger, M., Schmieder, K., Werner, S. 2004: General Framework for a Professional Evaluation System for Lakeshore Conservation and Water Body Protection, using Lake Constance as an Example. Expertise of the Arbeitsgruppe Bodenseeufer (AGBU) for the Bodensee-Stiftung and the Global Nature Fund, Radolfzell. Constance. 24 p.

Rowan, J. 2008: Lake habitat survey in the United Kingdom. Field survey guidance manual. The Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research. Edinburgh. pp. 22–35.

Survey of the nations lakes. Field operations manual (2007). United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Water, Office of Environmental Information. Washington. pp. 48–66.

Published

2011-07-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shore assessment at the gravel pit ponds of Délegyháza. (2011). JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY | TÁJÖKÖLÓGIAI LAPOK , 9(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3899

Similar Articles

11-20 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.