Kis növényvédelmi etimológia: Vegyszer-e a növényvédő szer?
Keywords:
chemical, pesticide, crop protection, semantics, cohesion, computational linguistics, societyAbstract
Basic question of the paper: whether is it possible to gain professional and reliable performance with changing means of communication? Is it feasible to substitute real, progressive action with communication? Where are the limitations of objectivity? Starting situation: a member of the Hungarian crop protection administration indicated at a scientific conference that a pesticide (plant protection product) must not be called chemical because this later expression decreases the respect of crop protection among consumers. This paper consequently tries to clear the definitions according to reliable Hungarian and international professional and linguistic references. It surveys the eras of crop protection, its developing, challenging and critical periods by computational linguistics (Google ngram viewer, an online viewer that charts frequencies of any word or short sentence using yearly count of n-grams in the sources printed between 1880 and 2000). English and German crop protection expressions like pesticide, chemical control, integrated pest management, biological control, genetically modified crops; Pflanzenschutzmittel, chemischer Pflanzenschutz, integrierter Pflanzenschutz, biologischer Pflanzenschutz and Agrogentechnik were studied and evaluated. The frequency of these words in Google books during a long run can characterise the success, pragmatic, research image of the evaluated society practice. Although evaluation of such semantic units must have incalculable uncertainty, since being precedent events they can be compared with professional references. On the strength of relevant references, most pesticides used in crop protection are chemicals in the scientific as well as accepted meaning of the word. Evaluation and respect of a given economic, production branch is determined by its production standard, product quality and product safety. These must be - regarding crop protection – the abundant, good quality products, which are possibly free of pesticide residues and produced sustainably. Sustainable crop protection suits integrated pest management of which use is compulsory in EU member states from 1 January 2014.
References
Andow, D. A. and Hilbeck, A. 2004. Science-based risk assessment for non-target effects of transgenic crops. BioScience, 54(7). 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0637:SRAFNE]2.0.CO;2
Anonymous 1994. New Tomato Developed through Biotechnology. http://archive.hhs.gov/news/press/1994pres/940518.txt
Bognár S. and Huzián L. 1979. Növényvédelmi állattan. Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, p. 7–557.
Bozsik, A. 2013. A Bt-transzgénikus növények néhány hatékonysági és környezeti hiányossága. Növényvédelem, 49(10), 462–471.
Carson, R. 1962. Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 5–378. https://archive.org/stream/fp_Silent_Spring-Rachel_Carson-1962/Silent_Spring-Rachel_Carson1962_djvu.txt
James, C. 2014. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Garcia, M. A. and Altieri, M. A. 2005. Transgenic crops: Implications for biodiversiti and sustainable agriculture. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25. 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467605277293
Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Keweshan, R. S. and Dunbar, M. W. 2011. Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by Western Corn Rootworm. PLoS ONE, 6(7), e22629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022629
Mensah, P. K., Palmer, C. G., Odume, O. N. 2015. Ecotoxicology of glyphosate and glyphosatebased herbicides - Toxicity to wildlife and humans. In: Larramendy, M. L., Soloneski, S. (eds.): Toxicity and hazard of agrochemicals. https://doi.org/10.5772/60767
Metcalf, R. L. 1971. The chemistry and biology of pesticides. In : White-Stephens, R. H. (ed.) Pesticides in the environment. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, Vol. 1. Part 1. 5–270.
Giannopoulou, Z. 2015. Plato: Theaetetus http://www.iep.utm.edu/theatetu/
Michel, J-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Brockman, W., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A. and Aiden, E. L. 2010. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science (Published online ahead of print: 12/16/2010)
Ninomiya, H., Weinberger, H. F. 2003. Pest control may make the pest population explode. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 54. 869–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-003-3210-5
Nosticzius, Á. 1983. Növényvédelmi kémia In: Loch, J., Nosticzius, Á. Alkalmazott kémia, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, 201–363.
Odum, E. P. 1996. Ecology. A bridge between science and society. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 5–262.
Ohkawa, H., Miyagawa, H. and Lee, Ph. W. (eds.) 2007. Pesticide chemistry. Crop protection, public health, environmental safety. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 1–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527611249
Pearson, H. 2006. Transgenic cotton drives insect boom. Secondary pests could undermine initial benefits of Bt cotton. http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060724/full/060724-5.html https://doi.org/10.1038/news060724-5
Plato: Republic 28 (509d-511e): http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0168%3Abook%3D6%3Asection%3D509d
Smith, R. F. and Reynolds, H. T. 1966. Principles, definitions and scope of integrated pest control. Proceedings FAO Symposium on Integrated Pest Control, 1. 11–17.
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., van den Bosch, R., Hagen, K. S. 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia, 29. 81–101. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v29n02p081
United States Environmental Protection Agency 1972. DDT ban takes effect.
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2015. Glyphosate.
Wikiszótár 2015. http://wikiszotar.hu/wiki/magyar_ertelmezo_szotar/K%C3%A9mia
Wurster, Ch. F. 1975. The decision to ban DDT.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Bozsik András

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Cikkre a Creative Commons 4.0 standard licenc alábbi típusa vonatkozik: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0. Ennek értelmében a mű szabadon másolható, terjeszthető, bemutatható és előadható, azonban nem használható fel kereskedelmi célokra (NC), továbbá nem módosítható és nem készíthető belőle átdolgozás, származékos mű (ND). A licenc alapján a szerző vagy a jogosult által meghatározott módon fel kell tüntetni a szerző nevét és a szerzői mű címét (BY).