Cattle’s behaviour – perceptions, relationships, studies and measurements of temperament

Autor/innen

  • Jeremy Hervé Department of Cattle and Sheep Breeding, Szent István University, 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary; Dronten Professional Agricultural University, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands
  • Andrea Szentléleki Department of Cattle and Sheep Breeding, Szent István University, 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary
  • János Tőzsér Department of Cattle and Sheep Breeding, Szent István University, 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary

Schlagwörter:

cattle behaviour, perception, human-animal relationship, temperament

Abstract

Nowadays, the evolution of the worldwide agriculture has come to raise new aspects, and animal welfare is one of them. The measurement of cattle’s behaviour and its assessment has consequently become more and more important. However, basic knowledge of general and applied ethology are needed in order to measure behaviour and draw conclusions. The authors’ aim was to summarize and explain this basic information in order to support further studies about cattle’s behaviour. For this purpose, the environmental perceptions of animals have been looked over to understand how animals have connection with their surroundings. Then, relationships of an animal with other animals of the same species and with humans have been detailed before to focus on temperament described as the reaction that an animal shows in response to a stimulation of its external environment. As measuring temperament under different test conditions is the main way of determining the behavioural type of animals, so the different methods of measurement also had to be explained. Finally, all knowledge in this review are suggested to use for further studies concerning animal behaviour.

Autor/innen-Biografien

  • Jeremy Hervé, Department of Cattle and Sheep Breeding, Szent István University, 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary; Dronten Professional Agricultural University, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands

    jeherve@gmail.com

  • Andrea Szentléleki, Department of Cattle and Sheep Breeding, Szent István University, 2103 Gödöllő, Hungary

    Szentleleki.Andrea@mkk.szie.hu

Literaturhinweise

Albright, J.L, Gordon, W.P., Black, W.C., Dietrich, J.P., Snyder, W.W., Meadows, C.E. (1966): Behavioural responses of cows to auditory training. Journal of Dairy Science, 49(1) 104–106. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)87800-1

Blaschke, C.F., Thompson, D.L., Humes, P.E., Godke, R.A. (1984): Olfaction, sight and auditory perception of mature bulls in detecting oestrual responses in beef heifers. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, 10–14. June 1984. Publication 284.

Boissy, A., Bouissou, M.F. (1988): Effects of early handling on heifers’ subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 20(3–4) 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(88)90051-2

Bucherauer, D. (1999): Genetics of Behaviour in Cattle. In: Fries, R. – Ruvinsky A.(ed) The Genetics of Cattle, CAB International, Wallingford, UK

Budzynska, B., Ceglinska, A., Kamieniak, J., Krupa, W., Sapula, M. (2005): Behaviour of dairy cows during premilking udder preparation. Book of Abstracts of the 4th International Congress on Ethology in Animal Production, 33–35.

Burrow, H.M. (1997): Measurement of temperament and their relationship with performance traits of beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts, 65. 478–495.

Burrow, H.M., Seifert, G.W., Corbet, N.J. (1988): A new technique for measuring temperament in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, 17, 154–157.

Czakó, J. (1978): Gazdasági állatok viselkedése. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Bp. 18–19., 213.

Davies, R.O., Kare, M.R., Cagan, R.H. (1981): Distribution of taste buds on fungiform and circumvallate papillae of bovine tongue. PMID: 507400 (PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE).

Fordyce, G., Goddard, M.E., Seifert, G.W. (1982): The measurement of temperament in cattle and the effect of experience and genotype. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production, 14. 329–332.

Fraser, A.F., Broom, D.M. (1990): Farm animal behaviour and welfare. Bailllière Tindall, London.

Graf, B., Senn, M. (1999): Behavioural and physiological responses of calves to dehorning by heat cauterization with or without local anaesthesia. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 62(2–3) 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00218-4

Graham, S. (2005): Essential animal behaviour. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Hull, UK.

Grandin, T. (1989): Behavioural principles of Livestock Handling. Professional Animal Scientist, 5(2) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)32304-4

Gupta, S.C., Mishra, R.R. (1979): Temperament and its effect on milking ability of Karan Swiss cows. Proceedings of the XX. International Dairy Congress, 130.

Heffner, R.S., Masterton, R.B. (1990): Sound localisation in mammals: brain-stem mechanisms. In: Comparative Perception. Vol. 1 Basic Mechanism (eds M.A. Berckley and W.C. Stebbins). John Wiley and sons. Chichester.

Jensen, P. (2006): A háziállatok etológiája. (The Ethology of Domestic Animals) Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest. 98–104.

Kabuga, J.D., Appiah, P. (1992): A note of the ease of handling and flight distance of Bos indicus, Bos taurus and their crossbreds. Animal Production, 54(2) 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100036953

Kilgour, R. (1975): The open field test as an assessment of the temperament of dairy cows. Animal Behaviour, 23(3) 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(75)90139-6

Lanier, J.L., Grandin, T., Green, R.D, Avery, D., McGee, K. (2000): The relationship between reaction to sudden, intermittent movements and sounds and temperament. Journal of Animal Science, 78(6) 1467–1474. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7861467x

Le Neindre, P., Trillat, G., Sapa, F., Menissier, F., Bonnet, J.N., Chupin, J.M. (1995): Individual differences in docility of Limousin beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 73(8) 2249–2253. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382249x

Le Neindre, P., Trillat, G., Boivin, X., Boissy, A., Sapa, J., Menissier, F. (2000): Temperament and docility in Limousine cattle. Presented at the International Limousin Conference, France, ACS-ERH, INRA Theix, 63122, France

Lewis, J.G. (1978): Game domestication for animal production in Kenya, behaviour and factors affecting the herding of eland, oryx, buffalo and zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 90(3) 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600056124

McDonald, A. (2003): Temperament – Its influence on feedlot performance and meat quality. Genetic selection to improve temperament. Key findings of the Cooperative Research Centre for cattle and beef quality. Workshop in scone, Australia. 17–19.

McDonald A. (2006): Scoring of docility in cattle. Beef News, 3–5.

Murphey, R.M., Moura Duarte, F.A., Torres Penedo, M.C. (1980): Approachability of bovine cattle in pastures: breed comparisons and a breed x treatment analysis. Behaviour Genetics, 10. 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066267

Murphey, R.M., Moura Duarte, F.A., Torres Penedo, M.C. (1981): Responses of cattle to humans in open spaces: breed comparisons and approach-avoidance relationships. Behaviour Genetics, 11. 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065826

Phillips, C.J.C. (1993): Cattle Behaviour. Farming Press, Ipswich.

Phillips, C.J.C. (2002): Cattle behaviour and welfare. Blackwell Publishing, London. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752418

Phillips, C.J.C., Lomas, C.A. (2001): The perception of colour by cattle and its influence on behaviour. Journal of Dairy Science, 84(4) 623–628. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74537-7

Phillips, C.J.C., Weiguo, L. (1991): Brightness discrimination abilities of calves relative to that of humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 31(1–2) 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90150-V

Phillips, C.J.C., Youssef, M.Y.I., Chiy, P.C., Arney, D.R. (1999): Sodium chloride supplements increase the salt appetite and reduce stereotypes in confined cattle. Animal Science, 68(4) 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800050773

Stefler, J., Holló, I., Iváncsics, J., Dohy, J., Boda, I., Bodó, I., Nagy, N. (1995): Szarvasmarha-tenyésztés. In: Horn P. szerk.: Állattenyésztés I. Szarvasmarha, juh, ló. Budapest, Mezőgazda Kiadó. 87.

Szentléleki, A., Pajor, F., Zándoki, R., Maros, K., Póti, P., Tőzsér, J. (2005): Possibilities to evaluate temperament in cattle and sheep breeding: review. Bulletin of the Szent István University. Gödöllő. 71–77.

Tóthné Maros, K. (2006): A szarvasmarha viselkedése. (The behaviour of cattle) Előadás, Szent István Egyetem

Trillat, G., Boissy, A., Boivin, X., Monin, G., Sapa, J., Mormende, P., Le Neindre, P. (2000): Relations entre le bien-être des bovins et les caractéristiques de la viande. Rapport definitif de Juin, INRA, Theix, France, 1–33.

Uetake, K., Hurnik, J.F., Johnson, L. (1997): Effect of music on voluntary approach of dairy cows to an automatic milking system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 53(3) 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01159-8

Uetake, K., Kudo, Y. (1994): Visual dominance over hearing in feed acquisition procedure of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 42(1) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90002-7

Veröffentlicht

2007-04-30

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Cikkek

Zitationsvorschlag

Hervé, J., Szentléleki, A., & Tőzsér, J. (2007). Cattle’s behaviour – perceptions, relationships, studies and measurements of temperament. Animal Welfare, Etológia és Tartástechnológia (AWETH), 3(1), 27-47. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/aweth/article/view/6888

Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in

1 2 3 4 5 > >>