The Challenges of the Production Planning Process in Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.7224Kulcsszavak:
flexibility, transparency, simplicity, capacity planning, parameterizability, speed, integration, customizability, raw material handling, automationAbsztrakt
The results of the research highlight that the automation of production planning can significantly increase the efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises. However, it is worth every manufacturing company to clearly define which processes they automate, which processes are left to human resources. If human resources are used for certain activities, it is advisable to assign these tasks to appropriate job titles. Another important pillar of development is the accuracy of the information flow between production planning software and ERP systems. When designing new systems, it is essential to prioritise integration to ensure a smooth flow of data between systems. A critical aspect of production planning is assigning production orders to capacities. The condition for preparing an appropriate plan is the adaptation of products with different workloads and production equipment capacity to the norm. It is extremely important to take human capacity into account here. In a modern production planning system, such considerations must be seamlessly integrated. During the research, a fundamental need was identified for data visualization. Over the decades, many solutions have been developed to visualize production planning, offering opportunities to significantly streamline and improve planning processes. Another important element in increasing efficiency is the creation of the right ratio of flexibility and control, i.e. excessive control processes reduce the competitiveness of production. The main bottleneck in most developments and automation is the underdevelopment of IT systems in manufacturing companies. Intervention and support are needed here as soon as possible, as domestic manufacturing companies will only be effective if their IT systems are modern and competitive.
Hivatkozások
Bareith, T. – Csonka, A. (2019): Profitperzisztencia vizsgálata a magyar sertésszektorban. Közgazdasági Szemle, 66(7–8), 847–862. http://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2019.7-8.847
Bean, R. – Davenport, T. H. (2019): Companies are failing in their efforts to become data-driven. Harvard Business Review, February 5, 5–8.
Bauer W. – Schlund S.– Marrenbach D. – Ganschar O. (2024): Studie: Industrie 4.0 - Volks-wirtschaftliches Potenzial fur¨Deutschland. Stuttgart: BITKOM.
Bongaerts, L. – Indrayadi, Y. – Van Brussel, H. – Valckenaers, P. (1999): Predictability of hier-archical, heterarchical, and holonic control.” In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on intelligent manufacturing systems. pp. 167–176. Leuven, Belgium, September 22–24.
Daniels, R. – Kouvelis, P. (1995): Robust Scheduling to Hedge Against Processing Time Uncer-tainty in Single-Stage Production. Management Science. 41. 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.2.363
Lingitza L. – Gallinaa V. – Breitschopfa J. – Finamorea L. – Sihna W. (2023): Quality in pro-duction planning: Definition, quantification and a machine learning based improvement meth-od. 4th International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing, Procedia Computer Science, 217. 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.231
Mignon, D.J. – Honkomp, S.J. – Reklaitis, G.V. (1995): A framework for investigating schedule robustness under uncertainty. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 19(S1), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(95)87103-9
Oluyisola, O. E. – Sgarbossa, F. – Strandhagen, J. O. (2020): Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications. Sustainability, 12(9), 3791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093791
Oluyisola, O. E. (2021): Towards Smart Production Planning and Control: Frameworks and case studies investigating the enhancement of production planning and control using internet-of-things, data analytics and machine learning. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Pénzes, J. – Bujdosó Z. – Dávid. L. – Radics, Zs. – Kozma, G. (2014): Differing development path of spatial income inequalities after the political transition - by the example of Hungary and its regions. Ekonomika Regiona/economy of region, 2014(1), 73–84. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000422199700006
Slack, N. – Brandon-Jones, A. – Johnston, R. (2013): Operations Management. London: Pear-sons Education.
Schuh, G. – Schmidt, C. (2014): Grundlagen des Produktionsmanagements. In: Schuh, G. – Schmidt, C. (eds): Produktionsmanagement. VDIBuch. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg.
Wiendahl Hans-Peter – Wiendahl Hans-Hermann (2019): “Betriebsorganistaion fur Inge-nieure.” ¨ Hanser, 9., vollstandig ¨ uberarbeitete Auflage. Munchen: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co KG.
Letöltések
Megjelent
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kosztolányi János, Tégla Zsolt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
