Estimation of genetic trend for the backfat depth of pigs of Large White breed in two Ukrainian pedigree farm

Authors

  • Andriy Getya Kvasnytsky Pig Breeding Institute, Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Sciences, 36013 Poltava, Shvedska Mogyla 1., Ukraine
  • István Nagy Kaposvár University, 7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40., Hungary
  • Nikolay Berezovskyy Kvasnytsky Pig Breeding Institute, Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Sciences, 36013 Poltava, Shvedska Mogyla 1., Ukraine
  • Oleksandr Kodak Kvasnytsky Pig Breeding Institute, Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Sciences, 36013 Poltava, Shvedska Mogyla 1., Ukraine
  • János Farkas Kaposvár University, 7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40., Hungary
  • Csaba Szabó Kaposvár University, 7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40., Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.1964

Keywords:

pig, BLUP, backfat

Abstract

The BLUP method is presently the most widely accepted method for predicting the genetic merit of pigs. However Ukraine is still among the countries where this selection method is awaiting for introduction. Therefore, our aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness of BLUP and REML methods on two selected pedigree farm data near Poltava. Analyses were carried out altogether on 1153 records (167 sires, 549 dams). Backfat measurements were recorded by Piglog 105 instrument over the6/7 thoracic vertebra at the age of 6–7 months between 1997 and 2007. Due to the very small data size, the genetic parameters of the backfat depth were estimated for the Hungarian Large White dataset. Then with the help of these parameters, breeding values were estimated for the population of the present study using the PEST software applying single trait animal model. Least square means were highly stable for the examined period. Although the effect of year was significant (P < 0.01) the differences between the various years proved to be different only between 1994 and 1998 and between 1994 and 1999. Moreover the difference between the largest and smallest least square mean was less than 1 mm. Although the differences in the BLUE estimates were exceeding that of the GLM procedure (Figure 1) still it can be stated that the effects of the year-birth is relatively small, especially during the last 5 years. When the mean breeding values were regressed on the successive years the estimated annual genetic trend was 0.002 mm but it was not significant (P = 0.15). This result is unfavourable and suggests that the selection method used in the farms tested is inefficient in respect of backfat thickness.

Author Biography

  • Andriy Getya, Kvasnytsky Pig Breeding Institute, Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Sciences, 36013 Poltava, Shvedska Mogyla 1., Ukraine

    corresponding author
    getya@ukr.net

References

Chen, P., Baas, T. J., Mabry, J. W., Dekkers J. C. M., Koehler, K. J. (2002). Genetic parameters and trends for lean growth rate and its components in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 80. 8. 2062–2070. https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/80.8.2062

Chen, P., Baas, T. J., Mabry, J. W., Koehler K. J., Dekkers J. C. M. (2003). Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 81. 1. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81146x

Clutter, A. C., Brascamp, E. W. (1998). Performance traits. In: The genetics of the pig. (Ed.): Rothschild, M.F., Ruvinsky, A. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, U.K. 634.

Groeneveld, E. (1990). PEST Users’ Manual. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behaviour Federal Research Centre, Neustadt, 1–80.

Groeneveld, E., Csató, L., Farkas, J., Radnóczi, L. (1996). Joint genetic evaluation of field and station test in the Hungarian Large White and Landrace populations. Arch. Tierz., 39. 513–531.

Henderson, C. R. (1975). Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under selection model. Biometrics, 31. 2. 423–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529430

Hudson, G. F. S., Kennedy, B. W. (1985). Genetic Trend of Growth Rate and Backfat Thickness of Swine in Ontario. J. Anim Sci., 61. 1. 92–97. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1985.61192x

Kovac, M., Groeneveld, E. (2003). VCE-5 Users’ Guide and and Reference Manual. Version 5.1. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Animal Science, Domzale, Slovenia; Institute of Animal Science, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Mariensee, Neustadt, Germany, 1–68.

Nagy, I., Csató, L., Farkas, J., Gyovai, P., Radnóczi, L., Komlósi, I. (2008). Genetic parameters of direct and ratio traits from field and station tests of pigs. Arch. Tierz., 51. 2. 166–172. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-51-172-2008

Sas Institute inc. (2004). SAS/STAT® 9.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC, USA

Sellier, P. (1998). Genetics of Meat and Carcass traits. In: The genetics of the pig. (Ed.): Rothschild, M.F., Ruvinsky, A. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, U.K. 634.

Tran, A. T. (1992). Évszaki hatások a sertések üzemi sajátteljesítmény-vizsgálatában. Állattenyésztés és Takarmányozás. 41. 29–39.

Wolf, J., Wolfova, M Groeneveld, E., Jelinkova, V. (1998). Estimation of genetic and environmental trends for production traits in Czech Landrace and and Large White Pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 43. 545–550.

Wolf, J., Zakova, E. Groeneveld, E. (2005). Genetic parameters for a joint genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits in pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50. 3. 96–103. https://doi.org/10.17221/4001-CJAS

Downloads

Published

2010-10-15

Issue

Section

Section 1 Pig Breeding

How to Cite

Getya, A., Nagy, I., Berezovskyy, N., Kodak, O., Farkas, J., & Szabó, C. (2010). Estimation of genetic trend for the backfat depth of pigs of Large White breed in two Ukrainian pedigree farm. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 14(2), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.1964

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>