Harmonized development of the farm economy and of the countryside

Authors

  • Csaba Sarudi Pannon University of Agriculture, Faculty of Animal Science, Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40. , Pannon Agrártudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Kar, Agrárgazdaságtani és Marketing Tanszék, 7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40.

Keywords:

countryside, rural development, development's priorities, financial conditions, structural framework

Abstract

The sphere of issues surrounding rural development in Hungary has gained prominence in the past few years. On the basis of the principles of the OECD 85% of the area of the country is judged to be of a rural character; 46% of the population lives here. It can be regarded as a particular attribute of Hungary that the role played in rural development by the agricultural sector is a more significant one than is the case in the majority of EU member countries. This situation can be explained by the relatively high GDP and export share of the sector, and by the fact that the proportion of the working population employed in agriculture is stabilizing at a level of approximately 8%. The exploitation of the regional development potential of the farm economy has, in the past decade, been hindered by the protracted crisis in agriculture and the decline of the economic and social situation in the rural regions. In the past two years regional policy and other laws drawn up to conform to the standards of the European Union have upgraded the significance of the countryside. In the interest of ensuring that the countryside should be capable of fulfilling its economic, social, ecological and cultural functions a number of tasks remain to be accomplished. The most important of these are the following: dynamisation of the farm economy and the attainment of an increase in competitiveness, the strengthening and diversification of the economic base of the countryside, phased development of public utilities in the countryside, an improvement in employment and earnings relations and also in living conditions and the intellectual level prevailing, and finally increased protection of nature and of the environment. It is also necessary to ensure that financial guarantees for rural development are created. A task to be accomplished which should not be diminished in importance is the formulation of regional concepts for rural development, the drawing up of integrated agricultural and rural development programmes constructed on the basis of these concepts, and the establishment of a regional information systems network.

Author Biography

  • Csaba Sarudi, Pannon University of Agriculture, Faculty of Animal Science, Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40., Pannon Agrártudományi Egyetem, Állattenyésztési Kar, Agrárgazdaságtani és Marketing Tanszék, 7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40.

    sarudics@atk.kaposvar.pate.hu

References

European Commission (EC 1997a). Agenda 2000, Volume I. Communication: For a Stronger and Winder Union. DOC/97/6, Strasbourg, 15 th July

European Commission (EC 1997b). Situation and Outlook - Rural Developments. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

Fehér A. (1998). Mezőgazdaság és vidékfejlesztés. (Agriculture and rural development). Gazdálkodás, 2(1), 79.

Horváth, Gy. (1997). Európai integráció, keleti bővítés és a magyar regionális politika (Enlargement of the European Union and the Hungarian Regional Policy). Tér és Társadalom, 3. 17–56. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.11.3.426

Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (KSH 1996a). (Central Statistical Office) Területi Statisztikai Évkönyv (Regional Statistical Yearbook). Budapest, 1997. 291–294.

Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (KSH 1996 b). Mez gazdasági Élelmiszer-ipari Statisztikai Zsebkönyv (Almanac of Agricultural and Food Industry Statistics). Budapest, 1997. 12.

Központi Statisztikai Hivatal megyei igazgatóságai (KSH 1996 c). (County directorates of the Central Statistical Office). Magyarország megyéinek Statisztikai Évkönyvei. (Statistical Yearbooks of the Hungarian counties) 1997. Chopter 23.

Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (KSH 1997). Tények és adatok a mezőgazdaságról és a falusi életkörülményekről (Facts and data on agriculture and living conditions in rural regions). Budapest, 5., 16.,18.,39.

Magyar Közlöny (MK 1996). (Hungarian Gazette). XXI. törvény a területfejlesztésről és a területrendezésről (Act XXI. on regional development and regional adjustment) 26. 1433–1444.

Magyar Közlöny (MK 1998a). A Kormány 19/1998. (II.4) sz. rendelete a területfejlesztés kedvezményezett területeinek jegyzékéről. (Government decree no. 19/1998. (II.4) on the list of favoured regions eligible for regional development subvention) 6. 562–564.

Magyar Közlöny (MK 1998b). Az Országgyűlés 35/1998. (III.20) OGy. határozata az Országos Területfejlesztési Koncepcióról (Hungarian parliamentary ruling no. 35/1998(III.20) on the National Regional Development Conception) 22. 1733–1740.

Sarudi, Cs., Szabó, G. (1997). A vidékfejlesztés prioritásainak és eszközrendszerének EU-konform harmonizációjáról (On the harmonisation with EU standards of the priorities and implement systems of rural development). Gazdálkodás, 2(4), 55–67.

Törvények és Rendeletek Hivatalos Gyűjteménye (TRHGY 1997). (Official Corpus of Acts and Decrees) Az Országgyűlés 30/1997. (IV.18) OGy. határozata a területfejlesztési támogatások és a decentralizáció elveir l, a kedvezményezett területek besorolásának feltételrendszeréről (Hungarian parliamentary ruling no. 30/1997. (IV.18) on the principles of subventions for regional development and of decentralisation, and on the system of conditions for the classification of areas eligible for support) 6. 7318–7319.

Downloads

Published

1998-02-15

How to Cite

Sarudi, C. (1998). Harmonized development of the farm economy and of the countryside. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 2(1), 87-101. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/aak/article/view/1334

Most read articles by the same author(s)