A Comparative Evaluation of Preservice English Teachers’ Coping Strategies in Oral Communication
Absztrakt
This study aims at exploring Preservice English teachers’ use of coping strategies for speaking and listening problems. The Oral Communication Strategy Inventory (OCSI) developed by Nakatani (2006) was used to collect data for the study. The participants were preservice English teachers at a Turkish University. The findings emanating from the questionnaire indicate that there is a significant difference in coping strategies for speaking problems in subscales such as Fluency-Oriented Strategies (FOS), Message Abandonment Strategies (MAS), and Social Affective Strategies (SAS) in favor of those students who had either spent at least one semester at a European university as a part of the Erasmus Student Exchange Program or those who reported that they frequently interacted with native speakers. A significant difference was also observed in the Fluency-Maintaining Strategies (FMS) subscale of the questionnaire relating to coping strategies for listening problems which was in favor of the same group of preservice English teachers. From the general evaluation of all the subscales of coping strategies for both speaking and listening problems, preservice English teachers revealed the lowest mean scores in the MAS subscale in speaking and in the Less Active Listening Strategies (LALS) subscale in listening problems, while they were highest in Negotiation for Meaning While Speaking (NMWS), Nonverbal Strategies While Speaking (NSWS) and Negotiation for Meaning While Listening (NMWL) subscales. These results suggest that the use of the target language in real communication settings contributes more meaningfully to the development of oral communication skills.
Hivatkozások
Berne, E. J. (2004): Listening comprehension strategies: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals. 2004. vol. 37, no 4., 521–533. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02419.x
Bialystok. E. (1990): Communication strategies : a psychological analysis of second-language use. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1990. 163 p.
Brown, G. (1995): Dimensions of difficulty in listening comprehension. In: D. J. Mendelsohn, and J. Rubin (Eds.): A guide for the teaching of second language listening. San Diego : Dominic Press, 1995. 13–30. p.
Cohen, A. D., Weaver, S. J., & Li, T. – Y. (1998): The impact of strategy-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. In: A. D. Cohen, (Ed.): Strategies in learning and using a second language. Essex : Longman, 1998. 107–156. p.
Cook, V. (1993): Linguistics and second language acquisition. New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1993. 313 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22853-9
Dörnyei, Z. & Scott, L. M. (1997): Communication strategies in a second language: definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning. 1997. vol. 47, no. 1, 173–210. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.51997005
Dörnyei, Z. (1995): On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly. 1995. vol. 29, no. 1, 55–85. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587805
Goh, C. C. M. (1997): Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT Journal, 1997. vol. 51, no. 4, 361–369. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.361
Goh, C. C. M. (2000): A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 2000. 28, 55–75. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
Goh, C. & Taib, Y. (2006): Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 2006. vol. 60, no. 3, 222–232. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002
Green, M. J. & Oxford, R. (1995): A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 1995. vol. 29, no. 2, 261–297 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625
Hasan, A. S. (2000): Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2000. vol. 13, no. 2, 137–153. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666595
Huang, X, H., & Van Naerssen, M. (1987): Learning strategies for oral communication. Applied Linguistics, 1987. vol. 8, no. 3, 287–307. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.3.287
Johnson, K. (1996): Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. 198 p.
Kitajima, R. (1997): Influence of learning context on learners’ use of communication strategies. JALT Journal, 1997. vol. 19, no. 1,. 7–23. p.
Lynch, T. (1997): Life in the slow lane: observation of a limited L2 listener. System, 1997. vol. 25, no. 3, 385–398. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00030-4
Maleki, A. (2007): Teachability of communication strategies: An Iranian experience. System, 2007. vol. 35, no. 4, 583–594. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.04.001
Messer, D. – Wolter, C. S. (2007): Are student exchange program worth it? Higher Education, 2007. vol. 54, no. 5, 647–663. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9016-6
Murphy, M. J. (1991): Oral communication in TESOL: Integrating speaking, listening and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 1991. vol. 25, no. 1, 51–75. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587028
Nakatani, Y. (2005): The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern language Journal, 2005. vol. 89, no. 1, 76–91. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00266.x
Nakatani, Y. (2006): Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 2006. vol. 90, no. 2, 151–168. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00390.x
Pica, T. (1996): The essential role of negotiation in the communicative classroom. JALT Journal, 1996. vol. 18, no. 2, 241–268. p.
Poulisse, N. (1990): The use of compensatory strategies by Dutch learners of English. Enschede : Sneldruk, 1990., 228 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868975
Rost, M. – Ross, S. (1991): Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachability. Language Learning, 1991. vol. 41, no. 2, 235–273. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00685.x
Santos, D. – Graham, S. – Vanderplank, R. (2008): Second language listening strategy research: methodological challenges and perspectives. Evaluation and Research in Education, 2008. vol. 21, no. 2, 111–133. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790802152183
Savignon, S. J. (1972): Communicative competence : An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia : Center for Curriculum Development, 1972. 115 p.
Sayer, P. (2005): An intensive approach to building conversation skills. ELT Journal, 2005. vol. 59, no. 1, 14–22. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci002
Skehan, P. (1998): A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1998. 324 p.
Smith, B. (2003): The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 2003. vol. 31, no. 1, 29–53. p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00072-6
Teichler, U. (1996): Student mobility in the framework of ERASMUS: findings of an evaluation study. European Journal of Education, 1996. vol. 31, no. 2, 153–179. p.
Ur, P. (1996): A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1996. 375 p.
Váradi, T. (1980): Strategies of target language learner communication: Message adjustment. IRAL, 1980. vol. 18, no. 1-4, 59–71 p.
Williams, J. – Inscoe, R. – Tasker, T. (1997): Communication strategies in an interactional context: The mutual achievement of comprehension. In: G. Kasper – E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication strategies. Essex : Longman, 1997. 304–322. p.
Letöltések
Megjelent
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Kömür Şevki, Büyükyavuz Oya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
