Green Innovation in Construction Industry and in Public Works Procurement in Hungary - Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.3469Keywords:
public works, innovation, construction innovation, innovation partnership, innovation-oriented public procurementAbstract
The construction industry is an important industry that determines the national economy of almost every country. Due to its productivity, the number of people it employs, and the number of enterprises involved, it is also decisive for other industries. The facilities completed as a result of public works often outlast their dreamers by decades, so it is very important that the construction industry is open to the innovative development of its operations, products and elements that provide infrastructure for others. The basic hypothesis of our study is that although a rapid regeneration took place in the construction industry after the pandemic situation, which is also supported by the number of public procurement procedures for Hungarian public works, the proportion of procedures using innovative solutions is low, as is the case with sustainability aspects. We also assumed that the share of public procurement procedures integrating R&D results and innovation partnerships is low compared to domestic public procurement.
References
Administrative Code Paragraph (1) of § 95. source: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a1500143.tv
Administrative Code Paragraph (1) of § 97. source: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a1500143.tv
Administrative Code Paragraph (3) of § 96. source: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a1500143.tv
Administrative Code Paragraph (4) of § 96. source: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a1500143.tv
Administrative Code Section 49, paragraph (1), point c). source: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a1500143.tv
ALPAY, E. – KERKVLIET, J. – BUCCOLA, S. (2002): Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing. American journal of agriculture economics, 84(4), p. 887–901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00041
Article 5, point 13 of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and Council. Download date: 02.11.2022. source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0023&rid=2
BARBOSA et al. (2017): Reinventing Construction: A Route Lake Higher Productivity. McKinsey Global Institute Report, Download date: 03.06.2022. source: http://dln.jaipuria.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2898/1/MGI-Reinventing-Construction-Full-report.pdf
Benchmarking of R&D procurement and Innovation Procurement Investments In countries across Europe (Comparative performance evaluation of research and development public procurement and innovation public procurement investments in European countries), European Commission (October 2020) Download date: March 10, 2022. source: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/ document.cfm?doc_id=69920
BLEDA, M. – CHICOT, J. (2020): The role of public procurement in the formation of markets for innovation. Journal of Business Research, 107, pp. 186–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.032
BOROS A. (2020): Die Frage der Nachhaltigkeit in der Hungarian Rechtsanwendung in Verbindung mit der Vergabe public Auftragäge In: Jan, Ziekow ; Andrea, Gyulai-Schmidt (ed.) Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien im Zuge der Modernization der European Vergaberechtsvorschriften. Berlin, Germany: Duncker und Humblot. p. 119–142.
BOROS A. – TORMA A. (ed.) (2022): Innovative recycling in the field of green construction economy. Győr: Universitas -Győr Nonprofit Kft., 5–19. Source: forrás
BOROS A. – TORMA A. (ed.) (2022): Trends and solutions in the field of green construction economy. II. Part. The modular architecture. Győr: Universitas -Győr Nonprofit Kft., 5–13 p. Source: forrás
BOROS A. – TORMA A. (ed.) (2022): Trends and solutions in the field of green construction economy. Part I. The green retrofit. Győr: Universitas -Győr Nonprofit Kft., 5–16. Source: forrás
Central Statistical Office: Changes in the volume of construction industry production by country (2022). Download date: November 3, 2022. Source: https://ksh.hu/s/helyzetkep-2021/#/kiadvany/epitoipar
CHAN, AP. – DARKO, A. – AMEYAW, EE. – OWUSU-MANU, DG. (2017): Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33.3, 04016057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000507
CZARNITZKI, D. – HÜNERMUND, P. – MOSHGBAR, N. (2020): Public procurement of innovation: evidence from a German legislative reform. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 71, 102620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102620
DARKO, A. – CHAN, APC. – YANG, Y. – SHAN, M. – HE, BJ. – GOU, Z. (2018): Influences of barriers, drivers, and promotion strategic you green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The Ghanaian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, pp. 687–703.
DE VASCONCELOS GOMES, LA FACIN, ALF SALERNO, MS, IKENAMI, RK (2018): Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, p. 30–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.318
Development. Economic Analysis, & Statistics Division. (2003): OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2003. Canongate US. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37371/KEP.2022.6.5
DUBOIS, A. – GADDE, LE. (2002): The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management & economics, 20(7), p. 621–631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210163543
EDQUIST, C. – ZABALA-ITURRIAGAGOITIA, JM. (2012): Public Procurement for Innovation dig mission-oriented innovation policy. Research policy, 41(10), p. 1757–1769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022
EDQUIST, C. – ZABALA-ITURRIAGAGOITIA, JM. (2020): Functional procurement for innovation, welfare, and the environment. Science and Public Policy, 47(5), pp. 595–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa046
ERIKSSON, PE. – WESTERBERG, M. (2011): Effects of cooperatives procurement procedures you construction project performance: A conceptual framework. International journal of project management, 29(2), p. 197–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.003
ERIKSSON, PE. – VOLKER, L. – KADEFORS, A. – LINGEGÅRD, S. – LARSSON, J. – ROSANDER, L. (2019): Collaborative procurement strategic for infrastructure projects: A multiple-case study. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 172(5), p. 197–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.19.00016
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science, research and innovation performance of the EU 2022 (2022): building a sustainable future in uncertain times, Publications Office of the European Union. Download date: 02.11.2022. source: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/78826
Eurostat. Construction producer price and construction cost indices overview (2022): Download date: 30 October 2022. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Construction_producer_price_and_construction_cost_indices_overview
FUERST, F. – KONTOKOSTA, C. – MCALLISTER, P. (2014): Determinants of green building adoption. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), pp. 551–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b120017p
GARCIA, R. – CALANTONE, R. (2002): The critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An international publication of the product development & management association, 19(2), p. 110–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110
GOLPÎRA, H. (2020): Optimal integration of the facility location problem into the multi-project multi - supplier multi - resource Construction Supply Chain network design under the vendor you manage inventory strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol: 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112841
Government decree on home renovation subsidies for families raising children 518/2020. (XI. 25.) Source: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a2000518.kor
Guidelines on innovative public procurement - Communication from the Commission (2021): C (2021) 4320 final. Download date: 10 March 2022. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/45975
HARTMANN, A. (2006): The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction management and economics, 24(6), p. 567–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600790629
Hungarian Construction Technology: ÉVOSZ assessed how the labor capacities of the construction industry can be increased (2021): Download date: November 1, 2022. Source: https://magyarepitestechnika.hu/index.php/iparagi-hirek/az-evosz-felmerte-hogyan-novelhetok-az-epitoipari-munkaero-kapacitasok/
KADEFORS, A. (2004): Trust in project relationships — inside the black box. International Journal of project management, 22(3), p. 175–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00031-0
KÁLI GM (2022): Statistical analysis of public procurement related to construction investments in 2021. In.: Public Procurement Notice Plusz, 2022. IV. Volume 6, No. 47–57, p.
KONG, F. – HE, L. (2021): Impacts of supply-side and demand-side policies you innovation in green building technologies: A case study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol: 294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126279
KUO, T. C. – SMITH, S. (2018): A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 207–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212
LENDERINK, B. – HALMAN, JI. – BOES, H. – VOORDIJK, H. (2020): The method lake encourage and assess innovations in public tenders for infrastructure and construction projects. Construction innovation, 20(2), p. 171–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-05-2019-0044
LENTNER, CS. – ZSARNÓCZAI, JS (2022): Sustainability and Environmental Conservation in Strategy of National Bank of Hungary in 2020s. In: Szakál, Anikó (ed.) 2022 IEEE 26th International Conference you Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES 2022). Budapest, Hungary: IEEE Hungary Section. p. 213–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INES56734.2022.9922646
LESLEY – POTTERS – NICOLA - GRASSANO (2018): The 2018 EU Survey you Industrial R&D Investment Trends.
Magyar Nemzeti Bank: Housing market report (May 2022): Download date: November 2, 2022. Source https://www.mnb.hu/kiadvanyok/jelentesek/lakaspiaci-jelentes/lakaspiaci-jelentes-2022-majus
Magyar Nemzeti Bank: Sustainability report (2021): Download date: November 3, 2022. source: https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/fenntarthatosagi-jelentes-2021-hun-0518.pdf
NYKVIST, B. – MALTAIS, A. (2022): Too risky – The role of finance as a driver of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, pp. 219–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.001
KAPLIŃSKI, O. (2018): Innovative solutions in construction industry. Review of 2016-2018 events and trends, In: Engineering Structures and Technologies, VGTU Press, Vol. 10. pp. 27–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/est.2018.1469
ORSATTI, G. – PERRUCHAS, F. – CONSOLI, D. – QUATRARO, F. (2020): Public procurement, local labor markets and green technological change. Evidence from US commuting zones. Environmental and Resource Economics. 75(4), pp. 711–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00405-4
OVIEDO-HAITO, R.J. – JIMÉNEZ, J. – CARDOSO, FF. – PELLICER, E. (2014): Survival factors for subcontractors in economy downturns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(3), 04013056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000811
OYEGOKE, AS. – DICKINSON, M. – KHALFAN, MM. – MCDERMOTT, P. – ROWLINSON, S. (2009): Construction project procurement routes: an in‐ depth critique. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. Vol. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910971018
PENNA, CC. – SCHOT, J. – STEINMUELLER, WE. (2021): The promise of transformative investment: Mapping the field of sustainability investing. Deep Transitions Working Paper Series.
PESÄMAA, O. – ERIKSSON, PE. – HAIR, JF. (2009): Validating a model of cooperative procurement in the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 552–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.007
POMÁZI GY. (2022): Analysis of the economic companies involved in innovative construction materials, products, and technologies and the domestic intellectual property protection features (subchapter 2.4) Boros A. - Torma A. (eds.): Trends and solutions in the field of the green construction industry - III. Part - Innovative building materials, products, technologies. Győr, Hungary: Universitas -Győr Nonprofit Kft.
PRIES, F. – JANSZEN, F. (1995): Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the suppliers. Construction Management and Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199500000006
Public Procurement Authority (PPA): The Public Procurement Authority – ANNUAL REPORT to the National Assembly, (2020). Download date: October 25, 2022. Source: https://www.kozbeszerzes.hu/media/documents/kozbeszerzesi_hatosag_2020_evi_beszamoloja.pdf
Public Procurement Authority (PPA): The Public Procurement Authority – Quick report, Hungarian public procurement in numbers (2021). Download date: October 25, 2022. Source: https://kozbeszerzes.hu/media/documents/Gyorsjelent%C3%A9s_2021.pdf Download date: October 25, 2022.
Public Procurement Authority (PPA): The Public Procurement Authority – Quick report, Hungarian public procurement in numbers 2022. I-III. quarter (2022). Download date: October 25, 2022. source: https://kozbeszerzes.hu/media/documents/Gyorsjelentes_2022_III.negyed%C3%A9v.pdf
RAINVILLE, A. (2021): Stimulating a more Circular Economy through Public Procurement: Roles and dynamics of intermediation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104193.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104193
RAKOVITSNÉ DR. SZINI K. (2019): Guide of the Council operating within the framework of the Public Procurement Authority on some issues of the application of the innovation partnership. Public Procurement Notice Plus. Year I No. 3 Download date: October 23, 2022. source: https://ertesitoplusz.kozbeszerzes.hu/szam/20190314/a-kozbeszerzesi-hatosag-kereteben-mukodo-tanacs-utmutatoja-az-innovacios-partnerseg-alkalmazasanak-egyes-kerdeseirol/
ROSE, TM. – MANLEY, K. (2012): Adoption of innovative products you Australia road infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics, 30(4), pp. 277–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.665173
ROSELL, J. (2021): Getting the green light you green public procurement: Macro and meso determinant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123710
SARGENT, JF. (2017): Global research and development expenditures: Fact sheet. Congressional Research Service. Federation of American Scientists, United States. Download date: October 23, 2022, Source: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R44283.pdf
SIMCOE, T. – TOFFEL, MW. (2014): Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(3), pp. 411–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.001
SLAUGHTER, ES. (1998): Models of construction innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 124(3), p. 226–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226)
SOARES DE ALMEIDA, CA. – DEL CORSO, JM. – ROCHA, LA. – DA SILVA, WV. – DA VEIGA, CP. (2019): Innovation and performance: The impact of investments in R&D according lake the different levels of productivity of firms. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(05), 1950036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500366
TERZIS, D. (2022): Monitoring innovation metrics in construction and civil engineering: Trends, drivers and laggards. Developments in the Built Environment, 9, 100064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100064
Public Procurement Bulletin No. 226 of 2018, on November 23, 2018.
UYARRA, E. – ZABALA-ITURRIAGAGOITIA, JM. – FLANAGAN, K. – MAGRO, E. (2020): Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844
YE, M. – MA, Y. – LIU, J. (2022): Why do public sectors perform high-level green public procurement practice? The new insight with fsQCA approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(14), 2719–2747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1978060
ZHANG, J. – OUYANG, Y. – BALLESTEROS-PÉREZ, P. – LI, H. – PHILBIN, SP. – LI, Z. – SKITMORE, M. (2021): Understanding the environmental impacts _ regulations you green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65, 102647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102647
ZUBIZARRETA, M. – CUADRADO, J. – IRADI, J. – GARCÍA, H. – ORBE, A. (2017): Innovation evaluation model for macro-construction sector companies: A study in Spain. Evaluation and program planning, Vol: 61, p. 22–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Central European Green Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
