Examination of Red Clover Optimum Harvesting Status in Seed Production With Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)

Szerzők

  • György Kerezsi Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences
  • Ágnes Kun Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences
  • Mihály Jancsó Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.6437

Kulcsszavak:

red clover, harvesting status, seed production, deep learning, single-shot detector

Absztrakt

Red clover is the second most valuable and intensively produced leguminous fodder crop in Hungary. Optimum harvesting should start when 75-80 per cent of seed-heads are brown and 90 per cent or more of the seeds are past the hard-dough stage of maturity. Harvesting must be done before an appreciable amount of seed-head deterioration begins. On fall plantings the first-year crop normally matures during the months of August and September. Seed from second-year stands, if not cut back, will mature somewhat earlier. The harvesting of red clover is divided into two distinct operations: (1) the curing or preparation and (2) the hulling and separation of the seed. The curing is by windrowing or contact desiccant spraying. It is the timing of each step that can make all the difference between a good yield and a mediocre one. The agronomists decide those actions with personal on-site inspections of the heads. Their decisions rely on random point sampling. A trend has developed with the recent interest in the harvesting time estimation of red clover in seed production to meet the demands of sustainable and precise agriculture. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) are one of the current state-of-the-art tools when it comes to supporting farm-scale phenotyping trials. In this examination, we explored the red clover seed heads classification using deep learning on a UAS RGB aerial image. We assessed different ripening status of the flower heads with a single-shot detector (SSD) deep learning model. It is proposed that drone data collection was suggested to be optimum in this study, closer to the harvest date, but not later than the ageing stage. With SSD model we can calculate the number of heads on the vegetation surface but to differentiate them (e.g., purple-, light-brown-, dark-brown flower heads) with high confidence, we need more examinations, spectral bands or fine adjustments of the model with additional data.

Szerző életrajzok

  • György Kerezsi, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences

    György Kerezsi
    Assistant research fellow, PhD student, Corresponding author
    Department of Environmental Analysis and Technologies, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Szent István Campus
    kerezsi.gyorgy@uni-mate.hu

  • Ágnes Kun, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences

    Dr. Ágnes Kun
    Research fellow
    Center for Irrigation and Water Management (ÖVKI), Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Anna liget 35, 5540 Szarvas

  • Mihály Jancsó, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences

    Mihály Jancsó
    Research fellow
    Center for Irrigation and Water Management (ÖVKI), Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Anna liget 35, 5540 Szarvas

Hivatkozások

ANZANELLO, M.J. – FOGLIATTO, F.S. (2011): Learning curve models and applications: literature review and research directions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(5), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.05.001

JEONG, G.H. (2020): Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in women’s health nursing, Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing 26(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.03.11

GITELSON A. A. – STARK R. – GRITS U. – RUNDQUIST D. – KAUFMAN Y. – DERRY D. (2002): Vegetation and Soil Lines in Visible Spectral Space: A Concept and Technique for Remote Estimation of Vegetation Fraction. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23, 2537−2562. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110107806

JING, S. – BOELT, B. (2021): Seed production of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) under Danish field conditions. Agriculture, 11(12), 1289. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121289

JENKS, G.F. (1967). The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7, 186–190.

JUNG, A. – LOCHERER, M. – DARNELL, B. (2021): Video Spectroscopy meets Artificial Intelligence. Tags: ULTRIS20, light field technology, video spectroscopy https://www.cubert-hyperspectral.com/literature

KSH (2021): A fontosabb takarmánynövények termesztése és felhasználása (Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Cultivation and use of the main fodder crops, in hungarian) available: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/mez/hu/mez0023.html download 2024.11.29

LIU, W. – ANGUELOV, D. – ERHAN, D. – SZEGEDY, C. – REED, S. – FU, C.Y. – BERG, A.C. (2016): SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 21-37). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2

RICHARDSON, A.D. – JENKINS, J.P. – BRASWELL, B.H. – HOLLINGER, D.Y. – OLLINGER, S.V. – SMITH, M.L. (2007). Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia, 152(2), 323-334.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0657-z

SHARMA, P. (2022): Image Classification vs. Object Detection vs. Image Segmentation, Available: https://medium.com/analytics-vidhya/image-classification-vs-object-detection-vs-image-segmentation-f36db85fe81

SMITH, D., (1965): Forage Production of Red Clover and Alfalfa Under Differential Agronomy Journal, 57., 463-465, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700050017x

Letöltések

Megjelent

2024-12-16

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

Cikk szövege

Hogyan kell idézni

Examination of Red Clover Optimum Harvesting Status in Seed Production With Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). (2024). Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 12(3), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.6437