In Vitro Technics for Determination of the Eye Irritant Properies of the Agrochemicals

Authors

  • István Buda Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection
  • László Major Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection
  • Rita Szabó Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection
  • Nadhirah Binti Saidon Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4717-6153
  • József Lehel University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Institute of Food Chain Science, Department of Food Hygiene https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8021-0566
  • Péter Budai Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection

Keywords:

eye irritation, in vitro, corneal swelling, corneal opacity, fluorescein retention

Abstract

Until now the most popular method to classify substances’ eye irritation potential is the OECD 405 test guideline. The basis of this is the Draize-test, which is one of the most criticized in vivo methods, because of the injuries of the test animals and subjective nature of the test in recording the results. Nowadays, several alternative tests are available which can be partly or totally replaced the in vivo eye irritation testing depending on the circumstances. The Isolated Chicken Eye Test (ICET) is part of these alternative methods. Four different agrochemicals (Biscaya, Dezormon, Kyleo, Pulsar 40 SL) were examined with this in vitro method. In ICET the eye irritation potential of test items were predicted based on the combination of three endpoints: corneal swelling, corneal opacity and fluorescein retention. The basis of determination of each endpoint was the differences between values of the base line measurement and values of any observation time points after the post-treatment rinse. Three agrochemicals showed different severity irritation potential and one agrochemical did not show any effect on the treated corneas. Comparing these in vitro results with the available in vivo data of the tested agrochemicals, results are found to be corresponding to each other.

Author Biographies

  • István Buda, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection

    correspondence
    istvan.buda@toxicooop.com

  • László Major, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection

    major.laszlo@phd.uni-mate.hu

  • Rita Szabó, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection

    szabo.rita@uni-mate.hu

  • Nadhirah Binti Saidon, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection

    saidon.nadhirah.binti.1@phd.uni-mate.hu

  • József Lehel, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Institute of Food Chain Science, Department of Food Hygiene

    lehel.jozsef@univet.hu

  • Péter Budai, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Plant Protection

    budai.peter@uni-mate.hu

References

Adriaens, E., Barroso, J., Eskes, C., Hoffmann, S., McNamee, P., Alépée, N., Bessou Touya, S., De Smedt, A., De Wever, B., Pfannenbecker, U., Tailhardat, M. and Zuang V. 2014. Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods. Archives of Toxicology. 88 (3) 701–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1156-8

Buda, I., Budai, P., Szabó, R. and Lehel, J. 2013. In vitro eye corrosion study of agrochemicals on isolated chicken eye. Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences. 78 (2) 177–181. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25145239/

Budai, P., Várnagy, L., Fejes, S., Somlyay, I. M., Linczmayer, K. and Pongrácz, A. 2004. Irritative effects of some pesticides and a technical component on tissue structure of the chorioallantoic membrane. Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences. 69 (4) 807–809. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15756873/

Budai, P., Kormos, É., Buda, I., Somody, G. and Lehel, J. 2021. Comparative evaluation of HET-CAM and ICE methods for objective assessment of ocular irritation caused by selected pesticide products. Toxicology in Vitro. 74 105150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105150

Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS Rev. 10, 2023)

OECD guideline 438 2023. Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage: OECD test guideline No. 438 (04 July 2023). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203860-en

Tavaszi, J. and Budai, P. 2006. Toxicity study of agrochemicals on chorioallantoic membrane of the egg. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences. 71 (2 Pt A) 101–105. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17390779/

Tavaszi, J., Budai, P., Pálovics, A. and Kismányoki, A. 2008. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals. Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences. 73 (4) 891–895. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19226840/

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29