Sustainability Performance Commitment and Market Liquidity

An Event study analysis

Authors

  • Purity Maina Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.5309

Keywords:

Sustainable Stock Exchange Initiative, market liquidity, Africa Security Exchanges, event study

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of voluntary commitments to the Sustainable Stock Exchange Initiative (SSEI) on market liquidity within African Security Exchanges amid an increasing global focus on sustainability in capital markets. While adopting the event study methodology, the study utilised the Paired T-test and the two-way fixed effect panel model to analyse the short- and medium-term market liquidity effects of 13 Security Exchanges. The findings revealed significant short-term market liquidity improvements, which diminished over time. These results highlight the importance of policy recommendations that offer insights for security exchange policymakers as they adapt to sustainability dynamics and strive to enhance market performance. The study suggests that exchanges adopt concrete strategies to maintain market liquidity improvements, such as incentivisation schemes for listed companies to enhance their long-term sustainability performance and comprehensive measures addressing other underlying factors influencing market liquidity. Further, security exchanges should continue developing investor education programs on sustainability to enhance awareness and implement more sustainable initiatives to enhance investor confidence and meet the growing demand for responsible investment.

Author Biography

  • Purity Maina, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences

    Purity Watetu Maina
    0000-0002-8673-611X
    Doctoral School of Economics and Regional Sciences
    Szent Istvan Campus
    Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences
    Maina.purity.watetu@phd.uni-mate.hu

References

Abdulkarim, Y. (2023). A systematic review of investment indicators and economic growth in Nigeria. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02009-x

AlKaabi, A., & Nobanee, H. (2020). Sustainable Capital Market: A Mini-Review (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3540111). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540111

Ametefe, F., Devaney, S., & Marcato, G. (2016). Liquidity: A Review of Dimensions, Causes, Measures, and Empirical Applications in Real Estate Markets. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2016.12090415

Apergis, N., Artikis, P. G., & Kyriazis, D. (2015). Does stock market liquidity explain real economic activity? New evidence from two large European stock markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 38, 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.05.002

Armitage, S. (1995). Event Study Methods and Evidence on Their Performance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 9(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1995.tb00109.x

Ayadi, O. F., & Williams, J. (2023). Stock market development and capital formation in selected African economies. Journal of Money and Business, 3(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-05-2022-0023

Becker, P. (2011). Investing in Microfinance: Integrating New Asset Classes into an Asset Allocation Framework Applying Scenario Methodology. Springer Science & Business Media.

Black, J. R., Stock, D., & Yadav, P. K. (2016). The pricing of different dimensions of liquidity: Evidence from government guaranteed bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 71, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.06.008

Broto, C., & Lamas, M. (2020). Is market liquidity less resilient after the financial crisis? Evidence for US Treasuries. Economic Modelling, 93, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.001

Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X

Cobandag Guloglu, Z., & Ekinci, C. (2022). Liquidity measurement: A comparative review of the literature with a focus on high frequency. Journal of Economic Surveys, 36(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12440

Duxbury, S. W. (2021). A General Panel Model for Unobserved Time Heterogeneity with Application to the Politics of Mass Incarceration. Sociological Methodology, 51(2), 348–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/00811750211016033

Eichhorn, P., & Towers, I. (2018). Principles of Management. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70902-4

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Mansi, S. A., & Sy, O. (2023). Event studies in international finance research. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(2), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00534-6

Elliott, D. J. (2015). Market Liquidity: A Primer. The Brookings Institution, Economic studies at Brookings.

Eraker, B., & Osterrieder, D. (2023). Market Maker Inventory, Bid–Ask Spreads, and the Computation of Option Implied Risk Measures*. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 21(5), 1820–1851. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbac025

Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C. B., Perez, J. P., Shapiro, J. M., & Carreto, C. (2023). xtevent: Estimation and Visualization in the Linear Panel Event-Study Design.

Hasbrouck, J., & Schwartz, R. A. (1988). Liquidity and execution costs in equity markets. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 14(3), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1988.409160

Ishfaq, M., Arshad, M. U., Durrani, M. K., Ashraf, M. S., & Qammar, A. (2022). Foreign exchange markets, behavior of options volatility and bid-ask spread around macroeconomic announcements. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2095772. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2095772

Kothari, S. P., & Warner, J. B. (2007). Econometrics of Event Studies.

Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210

Li, Z., Lambe, B., & Adegbite, E. (2018). New bid-ask spread estimators from daily high and low prices. International Review of Financial Analysis, 60, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.08.014

Lingnau, V., Fuchs, F., & Beham, F. (2022). The link between corporate sustainability and willingness to invest: New evidence from the field of ethical investments. Journal of Management Control, 33(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-022-00340-z

Liu, Y. (2015). CDM and national policy: Synergy or conflict? Evidence from the wind power sector in China. Climate Policy, 15(6), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.968764

Matongela, A. M., & Karodia, A. M. (2015). An evaluation of factors contributing to the stock market liquidity constraints or companies listed on the Namibian stock exchange. International Journal of Accounting Research, 2(8), Article 8.

Naidoo, C. P. (2020). Relating financial systems to sustainability transitions: Challenges, demands and design features. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.004

Naik, P., & Reddy, Y. V. (2021). Stock Market Liquidity: A Literature Review. SAGE Open, 11(1), 2158244020985529. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020985529

Nguyen, H. T.-H. (2017). Stock Market Liquidity: Financially Constrained Firms and Share Repurchase. Accounting and Finance Research, 6(4), 130. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v6n4p130

Ngwakwe, C. C. (2018). Stock Exchanges Sustainability Initiatives and Corporate Environmental Sustainability Commitment. Euro Economica, 37(03), 244–253.

Nykvist, B., & Maltais, A. (2022). Too risky – The role of finance as a driver of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.001

Olbrys, J., & Mursztyn, M. (2019). Depth, tightness and resiliency as market liquidity dimensions: Evidence from the Polish stock market. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 9(4), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEE.2019.102513

Oler, D. K., Harrison, J. S., & Allen, M. R. (2008). The danger of misinterpreting short-window event study findings in strategic management research: An empirical illustration using horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Organization, 6(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008090008

Pham, M. C., Anderson, H. M., Duong, H. N., & Lajbcygier, P. (2020). The effects of trade size and market depth on immediate price impact in a limit order book market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 120, 103992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103992

Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2017). Paired Samples T-Test. In A. Ross & V. L. Willson (Eds.), Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests: Writing Results Sections and Creating Tables and Figures (pp. 17–19). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_4

Sarr, A., & Lybek, T. (2002). International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper.

Stereńczak, S. (2020). Stock liquidity premium with stochastic price impact and exogenous trading strategy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.04.008

Sustainable Stock Exchanges. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2024, from https://www.unepfi.org/investment/sse/

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19

How to Cite

Sustainability Performance Commitment and Market Liquidity: An Event study analysis. (2024). Acta Carolus Robertus, 14(Különszám), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.5309

Similar Articles

1-10 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.