Generative Artificial Intelligence as Knowledge Transfer Tool: Lessons From Benchmarking Marketing Msc Exam Tasks

Authors

  • Bálint Tétényi Richter Gedeon Nyrt. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7000-4979
  • Stefan Kovács Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Department of Management and Business Economics
  • Anna Csapó Richter Gedeon Nyrt.
  • Márk Kádár-Buksa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.5595

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, generative AI, knowledge transfer, marketing, digital technologies, skills development

Abstract

The study examined why a time lag occurs between universities and workplaces in adopting artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies, and how this gap can be reduced. Our findings show that companies adopt new tools more rapidly, while educational institutions face accreditation and organizational barriers that slow adaptation. Students often acquire essential digital skills independently or in workplace settings, while lecturers frequently rely on informal channels to learn about emerging trends. To accelerate knowledge transfer, stronger collaboration between higher education and employers is essential, including joint course development, mentoring schemes, and professional partnerships. The research highlights that integrating AI and digital tools into academic curricula can better align graduates’ skills with labor market demands, particularly supporting early-career professionals.

Author Biography

References

Luz, A. – Olaoye, G. O. (2024): Artificial Intelligence and Employee Experience: Leveraging Technology for Personalization. EasyChair, 13219. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/27cs/open

Pedersen, I. (2023): The rise of generative AI and enculturating AI writing in postsecondary education. Front. Artif. Intell. 6:1259407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1259407

Adamopoulou, E. – Moussiades, L. (2020): Chatbots: History, Technology, and Applications. Machine Learning with Applications, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006

Sivakumar, A. – Gelman, B. – Simmons, R. (2024): Standardized nomenclature for litigational legal prompting in generative language models. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(21). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00108-5

Toma, I. – Umbrich, J. – Theil, M. – Sas, A. – Reinwald, W. H. – Theil, A. – Wahler, A. – ŞİMŞEK, U. – Fensel, D. (2023): Towards the digital transformation of Distribution System Operators using Knowledge Graphs and Conversational AI. 27th International Conference on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2023), Rome, Italy, 2023, pp. 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2023.0298

Chikán Attila (2008): Vállalatgazdaságtan, 4. átdolgozott, bővített kiadás, Budapest, AULA Kiadó, 332–334 p.

Najee-Ullah, A. – Landeros, L. – Balytskyi, Y. – Chang, S.-Y. (2022): Towards Detection of AI-Generated Texts and Misinformation. In Parkin, S. – Viganò, L. (Eds.), Socio-Technical As-pects in Security, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13176. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10183-0_13

Chan, C.K.Y. – Hu, W. (2023): Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Aronsson, J. – Lu, P. – Strüber, D. – Berger, T. (2021): A Maturity Assessment Framework for Con-versational AI Development Platforms. In The 36th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ’21), March 22–26, 2021. Virtual Event, Republic of Korea. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412841.3442046

Faust, A. – Dröge, M. – Odebrecht, C. (2023): Assessment of AI literacy Development and testing of a cus-tomizable set of items. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI), P-337, pp. 341–346

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Tétényi, B., Kovács, S., Csapó, A., & Kádár-Buksa, M. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence as Knowledge Transfer Tool: Lessons From Benchmarking Marketing Msc Exam Tasks. Acta Carolus Robertus, 15(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.33032/acr.5595