Pedigree analysis of Burlina cattle population
Keywords:
additive genetic relationship, Burlina breed, inbreeding, pedigree completenessAbstract
The aim of this study was to characterize the pedigree of Burlina cattle breed. The file was supplied by the Breeders Association of Treviso province (Italy) and included 2303 animals. About 79% of individuals had both parents known. The additive genetic relationship (f) among animals and the coefficient of inbreeding (F) were calculated as well as the number of generations and pedigree completeness index (PCI). The PCI increased over the studied period and individuals born in 2009 had an average value of 90% considering 2 generations and 69% considering 5 generations. The additive genetic relationship increased across years, reached a value of 1.95% in 2004 and then decreased slightly. Coefficient of inbreeding was low in 1990s and increased rapidly afterwards; in 2009 the F value was 4.81%. The monitoring of f and its use as weighting factor for selecting sires and dams of future bulls will be used to control inbreeding levels within the population.
References
Berg, P., Nielsen, J., Sørensen, M. K. (2007). EVA Interface User Manual.
Berg, P., Nielsen, J., Sørensen, M.K. (2006). EVA: Realized and predicted optimal genetic contributions. 8th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., CD-ROM communication no. 27–09.
Bittante, G., Xiccato, G., Debattisti, P., Carnier, P. (1992). Prestazioni produttive e riproduttive di bovine di razza Burlina, Frisona e meticce allevate in ambiente pedemontano. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 18. 125–137.
CNR (1983). Atlante Etnografico delle Popolazioni Bovine Allevate in Italia. Rome, Italy.
Del Bo, L., Polli, M., Longeri, M., Ceriotti, G., Looft, C., Barre-Dirie, A., Dolf, G., Zanotti, M. (2001). Genetic diversity among some cattle breeds in the Alpine area. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 118. 5. 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2001.00306.x
Dalvit, C., De Marchi, M., Dal Zotto, R., Zanetti, E., Meuwissen, T., Cassandro, M. (2008). Genetic characterization of the Burlina cattle breed using microsatellites markers. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 125. 2. 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00707.x
Fernández, J., Villanueva, B., Pong-Wong, R., Toro, M. A. (2005). Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs. Genetics. 170. 3. 1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.037325
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Sonesson, A. K. (1998). Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations. J. Anim. Sci., 76. 10. 2575–2583. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76102575x
SAS Institute (2006). SAS/STAT Software, Release 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Sørensen, M. K., Sørensen, A. C., Baumung, R., Borchersen, S., Berg, P. (2008). Optimal genetic contribution selection in Danish Holstein depends on pedigree quality. Livest. Sci., 118. 3. 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.027
VanRaden, P. M. (1992). Accounting for inbreeding and crossbreeding in genetic evaluation of large populations. J. Dairy Sci., 75. 11. 3136–3144. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78077-1
Wright, S. (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat., 56. 645. 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1086/279872
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Mara Battagin, Mauro Penasa, D. Pretto, Martino Cassandro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

