Issues why the European agricultural subsidies were voidable in terms of decouplement

Authors

  • Béla Imre Kárpáti University of Reading, Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading, United Kingdom

Keywords:

agriculture, subsidy, decoupled, green box

Abstract

The finance of the Agribusiness Industry is a highly criticised issue both on national and on international levels. Moreover, this will be one of the most questioned and negotiated key issues of the forthcoming WTO negotiations in Hong Kong. The developing countries continue to argue that the EU's agriculture subsidy system is not decoupled enough. This paper discusses the major origins of these arguments and seeks an answer to whether these arguments are correct. Also, it discusses the box system of the EU agricultural subsidies. Moreover, it tries to exceed the decouplement issue to the new agricultural point of view of the EU, namely the multifunctionality, and to show why this question can raise more arguments from the developing world against the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

Author Biography

  • Béla Imre Kárpáti, University of Reading, Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading, United Kingdom

    karpatibela@yahoo.co.uk

References

Beard, N., Swinbank, A. (2001). Decoupled payments to facilitate CAP reform, Food Policy, 26(2), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00041-5

Frandsen, E. S., Brigitte, G., Hans, G. J. (2002). Decoupling Supports in Agriculture, Impacts of redesigning European Agricultural Support, Danish Research Institute of Food Economics, Oxford, UK: 2003. 2. 106–131.

Glebe, W. T. (2003). Multifunctionality: How „Green” is the „European Model of Agriculture”, Techinsche Universitat München, München.

Gohin, A., Guyomard, H., Le Mouel, C. (1999). Measuring the Degree of Decoupling of Alternative Internal Support Policy Instruments: The Green Box Issue, European Agriculture Facing. The 21st Century in a Global Context, EAAE IX Congress, Warsaw, 78–95.

Rude, J. (2001). Under the Green Box – The WTO and Farm Subsidies. Journal of World Trade, 35(5), 1015–1033. https://doi.org/10.54648/380147

Latacz-Lohmann, U., Hodge, I. (2001). Multifunctionality and free trade conflict or harmony? EuroChoices, 1(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2001.tb00074.x

MARD (Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development) (2005). Europe Plane – Agricultural Credit Program 2004, accessed on 06/02/2005.

Mahe, L. P. (2001). Can the European Model be Negotiable in the WTO? EuroChoices, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2001.tb00067.x

OECD (2001). Decoupling: A Conceptual Overview.

Szendrő, MARD (Ministry Agricultural and Rural Development) (2004).

URAA, Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (1994). https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/14-ag.pdf

Walter, J., Trine, V. J. (2001). The CAP and the international trade negotiations. Rapport nr. 123 Statens Jordbrugs- og Fiskeriøkonomiske Institut, København.

Downloads

Published

2005-07-15

How to Cite

Kárpáti, B. I. (2005). Issues why the European agricultural subsidies were voidable in terms of decouplement. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 9(2), 73-80. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/aak/article/view/1746

Most read articles by the same author(s)