Subjective quality of yogurts of two Slovene private and two national brands having equal objective quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.2028Kulcsszavak:
brand, subjective equality, objective quality, yoghurtAbsztrakt
In order to compare the subjective quality of yogurts sold on the Slovene market under private and national brands, 100 randomly selected consumers were asked to taste samples of yogurts presumably belonging to two Slovene private brands (PB1 and PB2) and two Slovene national brands (NB1 and NB2). The samples offered to participants did not differ in terms of objective quality (the same product was placed in all 4 samples). The participants assessed their quality by assigning to each sample a mark between 1 and 7 (1 meaning the lowest quality, 7 the highest). The average value of marks assigned to samples of presumably national brands was higher (5.61 for NB1 and 5.26 for NB2) than the average value of marks given to samples of presumably private brands (4.85 for PB1 and 4.72 for PB2). The paper discusses the possible reasons for such perception of brands and the potential consequences of the findings for milk producers.
Hivatkozások
Acebron, L. B., Dopico, D. C. (2000). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: an empirical application for beef. Food quality and Preferences. 11. 3. 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00059-2
Brunsø, K., Bredahl, L., Grunert, K. G., Scholderer, J. (2005). Consumer perception of the quality of beef resulting from various fattening regimes. Livestock Production Science. 94. 1–2. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.037
European Commission (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A better functioning food supply chain in Europe. COM/2009/0591/final/.
Grunert, K. G. (1995). Food quality: a means – end perspective. Food quality and Preferences. 6. 3. 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(95)00011-W
Grunert, K. G. (2002). Current issues in the understanding of consumer choice. Trends in Food Science Technology. 13. 8. 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00137-1
Kotler, P. (1988). Marketing management. Prantice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey. 777.
Kuhar, A. (2009). Oskrbna veriga se je spremenila. Kmečki glas. 66. 44. 2.
Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an information cue: effects in product evaluation. In: Woodside, A.G., Sheth, J.N. and Bennet, P.D.Editors, 1977. Consumer and industrial buying behavior. North-Holland Publishers, Ney York, 267–286.
Podnar, K., Golob, U., Jančič, Z. (2007). Temelji marketinškega načrta. Fakulteta za družbene vede. Ljubljana, 224.
Pohar, J. Klopčič, M. (2010). Food Consumers Balkans. Processors Survey. Slovenia National report. Ljubljana, 25 p.
Pride, W. M, Ferrell, O. C. (1997). Marketing. Oughton Mifflin Company, Boston, 665 p.
Private label today. (2007) World of private label.
Ries, A., Trout, J. (1986). Positioning: The battle for your mind. McGraw-Hill Inc., Ney York, 213 p.
Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1990). Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process. Journal of Business Research. 21. 4. 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-A
Letöltések
Megjelent
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Jure Pohar, Andrej Majerle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
