Population proteomics as a novel tool for breed characterization: practical considerations

Authors

  • Enrico Zanetti Department of Animal Science, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Agripolis - viale dell’Università 16., Italy
  • Martino Cassandro Department of Animal Science, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Agripolis - viale dell’Università 16., Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.1967

Keywords:

population proteomics, characterization, chicken, local breeds

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the pros and cons of a population proteomic approach aiming to characterize local chicken breeds. The experiment involved a total of 29 males of Pépoi, Padovana, and Ermellinata di Rovigo Italian local chicken breeds. Sarcoplasmic protein fractions of breast muscle were analysed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Image analysis followed by statistical analysis enabled to differentiate groups of individuals on the basis of similarities of protein expression. Individuals well clustered into groups corresponding to the breed of origin. The Significance Analysis of Microarray analysis enabled identification of the most relevant spots regarding breed differentiation; 10 of these were identified by Mass Spectrometry, revealing preliminary evidences on the mechanisms of the breed differentiation process. The approach succeed in differentiating the individuals in groups corresponding to the different breeds, unfolding the relations among breeds and single individuals, analyzing and measuring the genetic variation at encoding loci. Results evidenced the ability to proteomic analyses to identify and to characterize chicken breeds.

Author Biography

  • Enrico Zanetti, Department of Animal Science, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Agripolis - viale dell’Università 16., Italy

    corresponding author
    enrico.zanetti@unipd.it

References

Biron, D. G., Loxdale, H. D., Ponton, F., Moura, H., Marché, L., Brugidou, C., Thomas, F. (2006). Population proteomics : an emerging discipline to study metapopulation ecology. Proteomics. 6. 6. 1712–1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500423

Doherty, M. K., McLean, L., Beynon, R. J. (2007). Avian proteomics: advances, challenges and new technologies. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 117. 1–4. 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103199

Inafuku. K., Maeda, Y., Okamoto, S., Ardiningsasi, S. M., Hashiguchi, T. (1998). Polymorphisms of egg white proteins in native chickens in Indonesia. J. Poult. Sci., 35. 5. 278–284. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.35.278

Meunier, B, Bouley, J., Piec, I., Bernard, C., Picard, B., Hocquette, J. F. (2005). Data analysis methods for detection of differential protein expression in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis Anal. Biochem., 340. 2. 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2005.02.028

Navas, A., Albar J. P. (2004). Application of proteomics in phylogenetic and evolutionary studies. Proteomics. 4. 2. 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200300603

Okabayashi, H., Kamiya, S., Tanabe, Y. (1998). Phylogenetic relationships among Japanese native chicken breeds based on blood protein polymorphisms (in Japanese). J. Poult. Sci., 35. 3. 173–181. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.35.173

Rathgeber, B. M, Boles, J. A., Shand, P. J. (1999). Rapid post mortem ph decline and delayed chilling reduce quality of turkey breast meat. Poultry Sci., 78. 3. 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.3.477

SAS, 1997. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT® User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 6.12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O., Mann, M. (1996). Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem., 68. 5. 850–858. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac950914h

Downloads

Published

2010-10-15

Issue

Section

Section 2 Poultry and Rabbit Breeding

How to Cite

Zanetti, E., & Cassandro, M. (2010). Population proteomics as a novel tool for breed characterization: practical considerations. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 14(2), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.1967

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2