A Comparative Environmental Assessment of Direct, Indirect, and Mixed-mode Solar Dryers

Authors

  • Abraham Kiprop Juma Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Doctoral School of Mechanical Engineering
  • Zoltán Kurják Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Technology
  • János Beke Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.7313

Keywords:

solar dryer, environmental impact, carbon footprint, material sustainability, embodied energy

Abstract

The present study offers a comparative environmental assessment of direct, indirect, and mixed-mode solar dryers to identify the most sustainable drying technology. Solar dryers are promising alternatives to open sun drying and fossil-fuel-powered dryers. They are also well-suited for rural areas in developing countries due to the widespread availability of solar energy.

This analysis focuses on material sustainability, carbon footprint, and drying and energy efficiency. Direct solar dryers (DSDs) are simple to construct and can be made using locally available materials. However, they suffer from poor temperature control and low efficiency, which can negatively affect the quality of food products. Indirect solar dryers (ISDs) offer better performance than DSDs but involve additional components, making them more expensive to construct.

Mixed-mode solar dryers (MMSDs) have the shortest drying time and the highest drying efficiency. However, they also have the greatest environmental impact due to their complex structure and high material requirements.

There is a need to balance affordability, environmental impact, and performance in solar dryer designs to serve rural farmers in developing countries effectively. Future studies should focus on integrating localized and eco-friendly materials into solar dryer construction.

Author Biography

References

AYUA, E. – MUGALAVAI, V. – SIMON, J. – WELLER, S. – OBURA, P. – NYABINDA, N. (2017): Comparison of a mixed modes solar dryer to a direct mode solar dryer for African indigenous vegetable and chili processing. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41(6), e13216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13216

BALASUADHAKAR, A. (2021): A review of construction, material and performance in mixed mode passive solar dryers. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 4165–4168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.679

CÉSAR, L.V.E. – LILIA, C.M.A. – OCTAVIO, G.V. – ISAAC, P.F. – ROGELIO, B.O. (2020): Thermal performance of a passive, mixed-type solar dryer for tomato slices (Solanum lycopersicum). Renewable Energy, 147, 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.018

DEEPAK, C.N. – BEHURA, A.K. (2023): Critical Review on Various Solar Drying Technologies: Direct and Indirect Solar Dryer Systems. Applied Solar Energy, 59(5), 672–726. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X2360073X

DEJCHANCHAIWONG, R. – ARKASUWAN, A. – KUMAR, A. – TEKASAKUL, P. (2016): Mathematical modeling and performance investigation of mixed-mode and indirect solar dryers for natural rubber sheet drying. Energy for Sustainable Development, 34, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.003

EL-MESERY, H.S. – EL-SEESY, A.I. – HU, Z. – LI, Y. (2022): Recent developments in solar drying technology of food and agricultural products: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 157, 112070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112070

EL-SEBAEY, M.S. – MOUSAVI, S.M. – EL-DIN, S.S. – ESSA, F.A. (2023): An experimental case study on development the design and the performance of indirect solar dryer type for drying bananas. Solar Energy, 255, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.03.023

FERNANDES, L. – TAVARES, P.B. (2024): A review on solar drying devices: Heat transfer, air movement and type of chambers. Solar 4(1) 15–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010002

GEETE, A. – SINGH, Y. – RATHORE, S. (2021): Energy and exergy analyses of fabricated solar drying system with smooth and rough surfaces at different conditions: A case study. Heat Transfer, 50(6), 6259–6284. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22171

GHATREHSAMANI, S.H. – DADASHZADEH, M. – ZOMORODIAN, A. (2012): Kinetics of apricot thin layer drying in a mixed and indirect mode solar dryer. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 4(6), 262. https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.4.6.262-267

GUPTA, P.M. – DAS, A.S. – BARAI, R.C. – PUSADKAR, S.C. – PAWAR, V.G. (2017): Design and construction of solar dryer for drying agricultural products. International research Journal of engineering and technology, 4(3), 1946.

HAO, W. – WANG, X. – LIU, W. – MA, J. – LIU, C. – WANG, L. (2025): Research on the performance and life cycle assessment of photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solar dryer: Comparative analysis with direct and mixed-mode. Applied Thermal Engineering, 272, 126425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.126425

HIDALGO, L.F. – CANDIDO, M.N. – NISHIOKA, K. – FREIRE, J.T. – VIEIRA, G.N.A. (2021): Natural and forced air convection operation in a direct solar dryer assisted by photovoltaic module for drying of green onion. Solar Energy, 220, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.02.061

JANGDE, P.K. – SINGH, A. – ARJUNAN, T.V. (2022): Efficient solar drying techniques: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(34), 50970–50983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15792-4

JHA, A. – TRIPATHY, P.P. (2021): Recent advancements in design, application, and simulation studies of hybrid solar drying technology. Food Engineering Reviews, 13, 375–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-020-09223-2

KAMARULZAMAN, A. – HASANUZZAMAN, M. – RAHIM, N.A. (2021): Global advancement of solar drying technologies and its future prospects: A review. Solar Energy, 221, 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.04.056

KHALIL, A. – KHAIRA, A.M. – ABU-SHANAB, R.H. – ABDELGAIED, M. (2023): A comprehensive review of advanced hybrid technologies that improvement the performance of solar dryers: Photovoltaic/thermal panels, solar collectors, energy storage materials, biomass, and desalination units. Solar Energy, 253, 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.02.032

KUMAR, P. – SINGH, D. (2020): Advanced technologies and performance investigations of solar dryers: A review. Renewable Energy Focus, 35, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2020.10.003

LAKSHMI, D.V. – MUTHUKUMAR, P. – EKKA, J.P., NAYAK, P.K. – LAYEK, A. (2019): Performance comparison of mixed mode and indirect mode parallel flow forced convection solar driers for drying Curcuma zedoaria. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 42(4), e13045. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13045

LINGAYAT, A. – DAS, P. – GILAGO, M.C. – CHANDRAMOHAN, V.P. (2023): A detailed assessment of paraffin waxed thermal energy storage medium for solar dryers. Solar Energy, 261, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.05.047

MAITI, S. – PATEL, P. – VYAS, K. – ESWARAN, K. – GHOSH, P.K. (2011): Performance evaluation of a small scale indirect solar dryer with static reflectors during non-summer months in the Saurashtra region of western India. Solar Energy, 85(11), 2686–2696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.08.007

MALIK, A. – KUMAR, M. (2022): A review on turmeric drying technologies. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62, 5358–5364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.539

MEHTA, P. – SAMADDAR, S. – PATEL, P. – MARKAM, B. – MAITI, S. (2018): Design and performance analysis of a mixed mode tent-type solar dryer for fish-drying in coastal areas. Solar energy, 170, 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.095

MUSTAYEN, A.G.M.B. – MEKHILEF, S. – SAIDUR, R. (2014): Performance study of different solar dryers: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.020

NAYANITA, K. – SHAIK, S.R. – MUTHUKUMAR, P. (2022): Comparative study of mixed-mode type and direct mode type solar dryers using life cycle assessment. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102680

OGUNDANA, O.S. – JUNEID, Y.M. – OLAIFA, O.P. – OWA, T.W. (2022): Design, construction and evaluation of solar dryer. Journal of Modern Science and Technology, 7(1–2):1–5.

SHARMA, A. – SHARMA, N. (2012): Construction and performance analysis of an indirect solar dryer integrated with solar air heater. Procedia Engineering, 38, 3260–3269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.377

SINGH, P. – GAUR, M.K. (2024): Review on development, recent advancement and applications of various types of solar dryers. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 46(1), 14471–14491. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1806951

STILING, J. – LI, S. – STROEVE, P. – THOMPSON, J. – MJAWA, B. – KORNBLUTH, K. – BARRETT, D.M. (2012): Performance evaluation of an enhanced fruit solar dryer using concentrating panels. Energy for sustainable development, 16(2), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.01.002

TIWARI, A. (2016): A review on solar drying of agricultural produce. Journal of Food Processing & Technology, 7(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000623

WATSON, A.G. – MUJUMDAR, A.S. – THORAT, B.N. – SHIRKOLE, S.S. – BHATKAR, N.S. (2024): A simple solar crop drying and pasteurizing system appropriate for smallholder and subsistence farmers in tropical and subtropical regions. Drying Technology, 42(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2023.2182316

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

Issue

Section

Cikk szövege

How to Cite

Juma, A. K., Kurják, Z., & Beke, J. (2025). A Comparative Environmental Assessment of Direct, Indirect, and Mixed-mode Solar Dryers. Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 13(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.7313