The Effect of Mulching on the Biological and Physical Properties of Soil in Maize

Szerzők

  • Modiba Maimela Maxwell Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Crop Production Sciences
  • Hanaa Tharwat Mohamed Ibrahim Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences
  • Simon Barbara Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences
  • Igor Dekemati Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Crop Production Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.3561

Kulcsszavak:

mulching, soil moisture content, soil penetration resistance, earthworm abundance, maize

Absztrakt

To study the effect of different mulching levels on the physical and biological properties of the soil. A field experiment was conducted in Gödöllő Szárítópuszta of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences experimental farm (Pest county). The experiment was laid down in a random block design with five treatments, namely M0%= control, M25%= 25%, M50%= 50%, M75%= 75%, and M100%= 100% level of mulch cover. Soil moisture content (SMC), soil penetration resistance (SPR) and earthworm abundance were measured. SMC, SPR and earthworm abundance were taken at 15-day intervals unless the weather prevented sampling. The experiment was set up from May 2019 until September 2019. The statistical data was carried out using one-way variance analysis with Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) multiple comparisons post hoc tests. The significance level used in the statistical studies was 5%. Mulch treatments improved water significantly in the first two months (June and July) of crop growth at 10 and 20 cm, however, moisture was not conserved for too long. Mulch treatment did not affect penetration resistance in all treatments. SPR was high after July in all the treatments due to low SMC. The measured SPR reached 5.3 MPa in August in M25%. The highest earthworm abundance was measured at M100% in August while the lowest was measured in control treatments. The grain yield was highest at M50% (1704 kg/ha) compared to the control. Mulch treatments were assessed based on factors such as soil moisture content, biological activity and penetration resistance and mulch was partially found to be advantageous.

Szerző életrajzok

  • Modiba Maimela Maxwell, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Crop Production Sciences

    Modiba Maimela Maxwell
    PhD student
    Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Crop Production Sciences, Department of Agronomy,
    H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1. Hungary

  • Hanaa Tharwat Mohamed Ibrahim, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences

    Hanaa Tharwat Mohamed Ibrahim
    PhD student
    Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department of Soil Science, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1. Hungary

  • Simon Barbara, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences

    Barbara Simon, PhD
    corresponding author
    associate professor
    Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Department of Soil Science, H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1. Hungary
    simon.barbara@uni-mate.hu

  • Igor Dekemati, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Crop Production Sciences

    Igor Dekemati, PhD
    Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Crop Production Sciences,
    H-2100 Gödöllő, Páter K. u. 1. Hungary

Hivatkozások

ABAIL, Z. – WHALEN, J. K. (2018): Corn residue inputs influence earthworm population dynamics in a no-till corn-soybean rotation. Applied Soil Ecology, 127, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.03.013

AKHTAR, K. – WANG, W. – REN, G. – KHAN, A. – FENG, Y. – YANG, G. (2018): Changes in soil enzymes, soil properties, and maize crop productivity under wheat straw mulching in Guanzhong, China. Soil and Tillage Research, 182, 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.05.007

BOGUNOVIC, I. – TREVISANI, S. – SEPUT, M. – JUZBASIC, D. – DURDEVIC, B. (2017): Short-range and regional spatial variability of soil chemical properties in an agro-ecosystem in eastern Croatia. Catena, 154, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.02.018

BOTTLIK, L. – CSORBA, S. – GYURICZA, C. – KENDE, Z. – BIRKÁS, M. (2014): Climate challenges and solutions in soil tillage. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 12(1), pp.13–23. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1201_013023

FANG, S. – XIE, B. – LIU, D. – LIU, J. (2011): Effects of mulching materials on nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen availability and poplar growth on degraded agricultural soil. New Forests, 41(2), pp.147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-010-9217-9

GURJAR, G. – SWAMI, S. – TELKAR, S. – MEENA, N. – KANT, K. – KUMAR, R. (2017): Soil biological properties and their importance in agricultural production. Biomolecule reports, 4.

JIN, K. – SLEUTEL, S. – BUCHAN, D. – De NEVE, S. – CAI, D. – GABRIELS, D. – JIN, J. (2009): Changes of soil enzyme activities under different tillage practices in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Soil and Tillage Research, 104(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.02.004

KADER, M. A. – SENGE, M. – MOJID, M. A. – NAKAMURA, K. (2017): Mulching type-induced soil moisture and temperature regimes and water use efficiency of soybean under rain-fed condition in central Japan. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 5(4), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.08.001

POSTMA-BLAAUW, M.B. – de GOEDE, R.G.M. – BLOEM, J. – FABER, J.H. – BRUSSAARD, L. (2010): Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification. Ecology, 91(2), pp.460–473. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0666.1

SHEN J.Y. – ZHAO, D.D. – HAN, H. F. – LI, Q.Q. (2012): Effects of straw mulching on water consumption characteristics and yield of different types of summer maize plants. Plant, Soil and Environment, 58(4), pp. 161-166. https://doi.org/10.17221/404/2011-pse

SINGH, V. K. – DWIVEDI, B. S. – SINGH, S. K. – MAJUMDAR, K. – JAT, M. L. – MISHRA, R. P. – RANI, M. (2016): Soil physical properties, yield trends and economics after five years of conservation agriculture based rice-maize system in north-western India. Soil and Tillage Research, 155, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.08.001

VÁRALLYAY, G. (2006): Soil degradation processes and extreme soil moisture regime as environmental problems in the Carpathian Basin. Agrokémia és Talajtan, 55(1), pp.9–18. https://doi.org/10.1556/agrokem.55.2006.1.2

WU, Q. – PAGÉS, L. – WU, J. (2016): Relationships between root diameter, root length and root branching along lateral roots in adult, field-grown maize. Annals of Botany, 117(3), pp.379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv185

http1: Monthly Averages for Gödöllő, Hungary (based on data from 1901–2010)". Hungarian Meteorological Service. Archived from the original on 12 November 2008. [Accessed 2019 January 20].

http2: ISO - International Standard Soil Quality. (2006). Sampling of Soil Invertebrates – Part1: Hand-sorting and Formalin Extraction of Earthworms. Reference number: ISO 23611-1:2006 (E) (first edition). [Accessed: 2019 December 17]

Letöltések

Megjelent

2022-12-15

Hogyan kell idézni

The Effect of Mulching on the Biological and Physical Properties of Soil in Maize. (2022). Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 10(Suppl 3), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.33038/jcegi.3561