Az RFID microchipek alkalmazhatósága a brojlercsirkék nyomonkövetésére

Ágnes Tóth; Anikó Hermán; Noémi Ásványi Molnár; Balázs Ásványi; Ferenc Kreizinger; István Gabnai; Zsolt Turcsán; Jenő Szigeti; Hedvig Fébel

Authors

Ágnes Tóth Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Mezőgazdaság és Élelmiszertudományi Kar, Élelmiszertudományi Intézet, 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Lucsony u. 15–17.
Anikó Hermán Állattenyésztési és Takarmányozási Kutatóintézet, 2053 Herceghalom, Gesztenyés út 1.
Noémi Ásványi Molnár Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Mezőgazdaság és Élelmiszertudományi Kar, Élelmiszertudományi Intézet, 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Lucsony u. 15–17.
Balázs Ásványi Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Mezőgazdaság és Élelmiszertudományi Kar, Élelmiszertudományi Intézet, 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Lucsony u. 15–17.
Ferenc Kreizinger P.S.S. Plusz Innovációs Kft., 5800 Mezőkovácsháza, Fáy u. 46.
István Gabnai P.S.S. Plusz Innovációs Kft., 5800 Mezőkovácsháza, Fáy u. 46.
Zsolt Turcsán P.S.S. Plusz Innovációs Kft., 5800 Mezőkovácsháza, Fáy u. 46.
Jenő Szigeti Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Mezőgazdaság és Élelmiszertudományi Kar, Élelmiszertudományi Intézet, 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Lucsony u. 15–17.
Hedvig Fébel Állattenyésztési és Takarmányozási Kutatóintézet, 2053 Herceghalom, Gesztenyés út 1.

Keywords:

individual identification of broilers, RFID microchip, animal production

Abstract

The authors complated fattening research with individual identificated broiler chickens. The aim of this study, was to determined of loss rate and readability of used RFID microchipes furthermore to exame there effects on the animal productions. Two treatment was used during experiment, control animals [without RFID chip] and experimental animals [tagged with RFID chip]). The experiment was done by control group 8 (240 chicken) and by experimental group 6 (180 chicken) revision, in revisions 30 genotype COBB roosters. It wasn’t significat different between tagged and untagged broilers body weight (P > 0,05). Loss rate of patagial RFID tag was high, but the readability of microchips were 98–99% during experiment, what is compared to other publications, it mean an excellent result. According to the results of authors it is stated that the individual identifications system, which has been used throughout the study, based on Radio Frequency, would be satisfactory for identifying broiler chickens and track them, However the spreading of the technology demands the increase of durability and accuracy of the marking.

Author Biography

Ágnes Tóth, Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Mezőgazdaság és Élelmiszertudományi Kar, Élelmiszertudományi Intézet, 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Lucsony u. 15–17.

corresponding author
totha@mtk.nyme.hu

References

Applegate, R.D., Jamison, B.E., Robel, R.J., Kemp, K.E. (2000): Effect of passive integrated transponders on ring-necked pheasen chicks. T Kansas Acad Sci, 103(3–4) 150–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/3628263

Bauer, U., Kilian, M., Harms, J., Wendl, G. (2009): First results of a large field trial regarding electronic tagging of sheep in Germany. In: Lokhorst C.; Koerkamp P.W.G. (Ed) Precision livestock farming ’09. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086866632_029

Caja, G., Conill, C., Nehring, R., Ribó, O. (1999): Development of a ceramic bolus for the permanent electronic identification of sheep, goat and cattle. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 24(1–2) 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00036-8

Carver, A.V., Burger, L.W., Brennan, L.A. (1999): Passive integrated transponders and patagial tag markers for northern bobwhite chicks. J Wildlife Manage, 63(1) 162–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802497

Curto, F.P.F., Nääs, I. de A., Pereira, D.F., Salgado, D.D’A., Murayama, M.C., Behrens, F.H. (2002): Predicting broiler breeder’s behavior using electronic identification. Agriculture Engineering International: the CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development. Manuscipt IT 02 001. Vol. IV. December

Dennis, R.L., Fahey, A.G., Cheng, H.W. (2008): Different effects of individual indentification systems on chicken well-being. Poultry Sci, 87(6) 1052–1057. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00240

Elbin, S.B., Burger, J. (1994): Implantable microchips for individual identification in wild and captive populations. Wildlife Soc B, 22. 677–683.

Fröhlich, G., Thurner, S., Böck, S., Weinfurtner, R., Wendl, G. (2007): Radio frequency identification system for the recording of the behaviour of laying hens. Gesellschaft für Informatik in der Land-, Forst-, und Ernährungswirtschaft e. V. 1–9.

Füzesi I., Herdon M. (2005): RFID – rendszerek perspektívái a húsiparban. A HÚS, 4. 229–234.

Gere T. (szerk.) (2005): Gazdasági állatok viselkedése IV. A baromfi viselkedése. Szaktudás Kiadó Ház, Budapest, 37–41.

Gere T. , Csányi V. (szerk.) (2001): Gazdasági állatok viselkedése. Általános etológia. Mezőgazdasági Szaktudás Kiadó, Budapest, 206–207.

Hannon, S.J., Jönsson, I., Martin, K. (1990): Patagial tagging of juvenile willow ptarmigan. Wildlife Soc B, 18. 116–119.

Hogewerf, P.H., Schouten, W., Smits, A.C. (2005): Do hens really go outside if they are allowed to do so? In: Should hens be kept outside? Workshop of the Animal Science Group, UR Lelystad and the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food. Wageningen, April, 18–20.

Hogewerf, P.H., Ipema, A.H., Binnendijk, G.P., Lambooij, E., Schuiling, H.J. (2009): Using injectable transponders for sheep identification. Joint International Agricultural Conference 65. Precison livestock farming. Wageningen, 6–8. July. https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086866632_031

Jackson, D.H., Bünger, W.H. (1993): Evaluation of passive integrated transponders as a marking technique for turkey poults. J Iowa Acad Sci, 100(2) 60–61.

Jamison, B.E., Beyer, R.S., Robel, R.J., Pontius, J.S. (2000): Passive integrated transponder tags as markers for chicks. Poultry Sci, 79(7) 946–948. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.7.946

Kern, C. (1997): Technische Leistungsfähigkeit und Nutzung von injizierbaren Transpondern in der Rinderhaltung. Dissertation. TU München- Weihenstephan, 1997.

Kétszeri D. (2007): RFID (EPC) – A legújabb technológia az élelmiszerek nyomonkövetésére. Élelmiszervizsgálati közlemények, 80:1. 13–15.

Lambooij, E., van’t Klooster, C.E., Rossing, W., Smits, A.C., Pieterse, C. (1999): Electronic identification with passive transponders in veal calves. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 24(1–2) 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00038-1

Lambooy, E. (1990): Das Injizieren eines Transpnders in den Tierkörper zur Identification. In: Petersen, B., Welz, M. (Ed.), Beiträge zur Tagung EDV – Anwendung in der Herden- und Gesundheitskontrolle. Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart,18–22.

Linderoth, S. (2005): How to assess individual animal ID technology: Five things to cheek before you buy. Dairy Herd Management, 32–37.

Low, M., Eason, D., McInnes, K. (2003): Evaluation of passive integrated transponder for identification of kakapo, Strigops habroptilus. Emu, 105(1) 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU04060

Marchant, J. (2002): Secure animal identification and source verification. Optibrand Ltd. LLC. Fort Collins, CO. 1–27.

Nehring, R., Caja, G., Ribó, O., Conill, C. , Solanes, D. (1998): Long-term performance of passive injectable transponders in sheep. J Anim Sci, 76. 267.

Pereira, D.F., Nääs, I. de A., Curto, F.P.F., Salgado, D., Murayama, M.C. (2003): Evaluating of the implanting sites microchip used in electronic identification in broiler breeders. Rev Bras de Agroinformática, 5(1) 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.09.001

Pereira, D.F., Nääs, I. de A. (2008): Estimating the thermoneutral zone for broiler breeders using behavioral analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 62. 2–7.

Sahin, E., Dallery, Y., Gershwin, S. (2002): Performance evaluation of a traceability system. An application to the radio frequency identification technology. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 3. 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2002.1176118

Schuster, E. W., Allen, S.J., Brock, D.L. (szerk.) (2007): Agriculture: Animal Tracking. In: Global RFID. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35655-4_9

Smith, G.C. (1999a): Meeting the challenge…what can you do? Cattlemen’s College of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association Midyear Conference. Denver, CO. 1–12.

Smith, G.C. (1999b): Providing assurances of quality, consistency, safety and a caring attitude to domestic and international consumers of US beef, prok, lamb. 12th World Meat Congress. Dublin, Ireland, 1–8.

Smith, G.C. (1999c): Traceability: Source-vertification, production practice-vertification and USDA process-vertification. Expo Prado ’99. Montevideo, Uruguay, 1–11.

Smith, G.C. (2004): Tracing US process on individual ID. Mimeograph Report. Meat & Livestock Journal, Nov/Dec Issue, 1–16.

Tóth L. (2008): RFID technológiára alapozott automatizálás az állattartásban. Animal welfare, etológia és tartástechnológia, 4:2. 51–59.

Watts, A.J., Miller, P.C.H., Godwin, R.J. (2003): Automatically recording sprayer inputs to improve traceability and control. In: Proceedings of the 2003 BCPC Congress Crop Science and Technology. UK: BCPC publicatons, Glasgow, 323–328.