Genetic Traceability of livestock products

Authors

  • Martino Cassandro University of Padova, Department of Animal Science, Legnaro, PD-35020,Viale dell’Università 16., Italy
  • Chiara Dalvit University of Padova, Department of Animal Science, Legnaro, PD-35020,Viale dell’Università 16., Italy
  • Massimo De Marchi University of Padova, Department of Animal Science, Legnaro, PD-35020,Viale dell’Università 16., Italy
  • Riccardo Dal Zotto University of Padova, Department of Animal Science, Legnaro, PD-35020,Viale dell’Università 16., Italy

Keywords:

genetic traceability, DNA identification, livestock products, food safety

Abstract

Aim of this review was to describe the novel approaches on genetic traceability of livestock products. The term traceability, regarding the livestock production sector, means the ability to keep under unfailing control the products origin and animals identity along all passages of the food chain, from farm to fork. In this way it represents a warranty both for the consumers and the producer and it will permit to know where, who and how a product has been produced. It is clear that traceability could be an important tool in order to preserve and to turn to account the livestock products, especially for typical ones. Different kinds of traceability (conventional, aromatic, geographic and genetic) are discussed in order to explain the principles on which they are based and their possible applications. Genetic traceability is based on DNA identification technology through the use of molecular markers. The genetic traceability might be used at four different levels: individual, cohort/group, breed and species. Regarding genetic traceability, the effective discrimination at level of unique animal identification depends on reducing the probability to find two individual sharing, by chance, the same genetic profile to an acceptable low threshold. For example in a standard proceeding even a two locus test with polymorphic markers as microsatellites (one in sixty-four chance of error, i.e. accidental match) might be sufficient to reach a verdict, but for a forensic case, eight loci (one in 16.8 million chance of error) might be sufficient to reach a verdict. The effective discrimination from the point of animals group (herd, breed or species) identification is based on two different approaches: deterministic and probabilistic. Deterministic approach is based on the analyses of neutral molecular markers specific for each breed and/or genes with different allelic forms fixed within breed as genes affecting coat colour. Probabilistic approaches are based on two methods, the first using the allelic frequencies typical of each group (herd, breed or species) while the second using genetic distances among groups. In conclusion, this review, showed as the novel approaches on genetic traceability of livestock products is an available method even if it should be improved in terms of cost reduction for single sample, work effort, reproducibility and accuracy of results. At the time genetic traceability is an important method for origin identification of livestock products and a tool for guarantee conventional traceability system as routine method for food safety.

Author Biography

  • Martino Cassandro, University of Padova, Department of Animal Science, Legnaro, PD-35020,Viale dell’Università 16., Italy

    corresponding author
    martino.cassandro@unipd.it

References

Ajmone Marsan, P., Milanesi, E., Negrini, R. (2004). Tracciabilità di razza con metodi molecolari. Proceedings of 7th World Conference of the Brown Swiss cattle breeders. Verona, 3–7 Marzo, 101–105.

Alderson, G. L. H., Plastow, G. S. (2003). Use of DNA markers to assist with product traceability and pedigree analysis and their role in breed conservation. AGRI. 35. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900005460

Alves, E., Castellanos, C., Ovilo, C., Siliò, L., Rodriguez, C. (2002). Differentiation of the raw material of the Iberian pig meat industry based on the use of amplified fragment lenght polymorphism. Meat Science. 61(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00179-6

Arana, A., Soret, B., Lasa, I., Alfonso, L. (2002). Meat traceability using DNA markers : application to the beef industry. Meat Science. 61(4), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00206-6

Bailoni, L., Mantovani, R. (2000). Caratterizzazione dell’aroma del latte bovino prodotto nel Parco Adamello Brenta e possibilità di valorizzazione. Atti del convegno “Formaggio razza Rendeva: un’opportunità per la razza Rendena e la Val Rendena”. Caderzone (TN). 27 agosto 2000.

Barua, A., Yoshimura, Y. (1997). Rural poultry keeping in Bangladesh. World's Poultry Science Journal,53(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19970031

Carriòn, D., Day, A., Evans, G., Mitsuhashi, T., Archibald, A., Haley, C., Andersson, L., Plastow, G. (2003). The use of MC1R and KIT genotypes for breed characterisation. Arch. Zootec., 52. 237–244.

Ciampolini, R., Cetica, E., Ciani, E., Mozzanti, X., Fossella, F., Marroni, M., Biagetti, C., Sebastiani, P., Papa, G., Filippini, G., Cianci, D., Presciuttini, S. (2006). Statistical analysis of individual assignment tests among four cattle breeds using fifteen STR loci. Journal of Animal Science. 84(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.84111x

Cocucci, M., Ferrari, E., Martello, S. (2002). Il latte dall’azienda agricola alla distribuzione: esempio di rintracciabilità di filiera. Industrie Alimentari. 41. 311–316.

Crepaldi, P., Marilli, M., Gorni, C., Meggiolaro, D., Cicogna, M. (2003). Preliminary study on MCR1 polymorphism in some cattle breeds reared in Italy. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2(1), 13–15.

Cunningham, E. P., Meghen, C. M. (2001). Biological identification systems: genetic markers. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. int. Epiz., 20(2), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.2.1284

De Marchi, M., Targhetta, C., Contiero, B., Cassandro, M. (2003). Genetic traceability of chicken breeds. Agriculture Conspectus Scientificus. 68(4), 255–259.

European Commission (2003). Overview report of a series of missions carried out in all member states during 2002 in order to evaluate the operation of controls over the traceability and labelling of beef and minced beef. General report Dg (SANCO) 9505/2003. Fod and Veterinary office of the health and Consumer protection directorate, European Commission, Brussels, 11.

Fernández, A., Fabuel, E., Alves, E., Rodriguez, C., Silió, L., Óvilo, C. (2004). DNA tests based on coat colour genes for authentication of the raw material of meat products from Iberian pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 84(14), 1855–1860. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1829

Gandini, G. C., Oldenbroek, J. K. (1999). Choosing the conservation strategy. Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources. Ed. J. K. Oldenbroek, The Neatherlands.

Golan, E., Krissof, B., Kuchler, F., Nelson, K., Price, G. (2004). Traceability in the US food supply: economic theory and industry studies. Agricultural Economic report no. AER830, march. Economic research service of the United States department of Agriculture, Eshington, DC, 56.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1994). ISO 8402: Quality management and quality assurance – vocabulary. ISO, Geneva.

Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., Thein, S. L. (1985). Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature. 314. 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/314067a0

Maudet, C., Taberlet, P. (2002). Holstein’s milk detection in chesses inferred from melanocortin receptor (MC1R) gene polymorphism. J. Dairy Science. 85. 707–715. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74127-1

Mauriello, G., Moio, L., Genovese, A., Ercolini, D. (2003). Relationships between flavoring capabilities, bacterial composition, and geographical origin of natural whey cultures used for traditional water-buffalo mozzarella cheese manufacture. J. Dairy Sci., 86(2), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73627-3

McKean, J. D. (2001). The importance of traceability for public health and consumer protection. Rev. sci. Tech., 20(2), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.2.1280

Milanesi, E., Negrini, R. (2003). Tracciabilità delle razze con diverse strategie di ricerca genetica, con particolare riferimento alla razza Romagnola, Proceedings of the seminary “La razza bovina Romagnola” Bologna 31th January.

Mullis, K., Faloona, F., Scharf, S., Saika, R., Horn, G., Erlich, H. (1986). Specific enzymatic amplification of DANN un vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb. Sym. Quant. Biol., 51. 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1986.051.01.032

Ovilo, C., Cervera, M. T., Castellanos, C., Martinez-Zapater, J. M. (2000). Characterisation of Iberian pig genotypes using AFLP markers. Animal Genetics. 31(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00603.x

Pancaldi, M., Carboni, E., Paganelli, A., Righini, G., Salvi, A., Fontanesi, L., Russo, V., Davoli, R., Beretti, F., Ravaglia, S. (2005). Come garantire l’autenticità dei prodotti agroalimentari tipici. Utilizzo combinato di traccianti biologici e analisi del DNA. Industrie Alimentari. 44. 1127–1134.

Portetelle, D., Haezebroeck, V., Mortiaux, F., Renaville, R. (2000). Traçabilité dans la filière animale. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 4. 233–240.

Russo, V., Fontanesi, L. (2004). Analisi dei geni del colore del mantello: tracciabilità di razza. Proceedings of 7th World Conference of the Brown Swiss cattle breeders. Verona, 3–7 Marzo, 101–105.

Sancristobal-Gaudy, M., Renand, G., Amigues, Y., Boscher, M. Y., Leveziel, H., Bibé, B. (2000). Traçabilité individuelle des viandes bovines à l’aide de marqueurs génétiques. INRA Prod. Anim., 13(4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2000.13.4.3786

Downloads

Published

2006-07-15

How to Cite

Cassandro, M., Dalvit, C., Marchi, M. D., & Zotto, R. D. (2006). Genetic Traceability of livestock products. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 10(2), 19-26. https://journal.uni-mate.hu/index.php/aak/article/view/1773

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>