Effects of two different watering tray types on the behaviour of geese

Authors

  • Marcell Molnár Pannon University of Agriculture, Faculty of Animal Science, Institute of Poultry and Small Animal Breeding, H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40. Hungary , Pannon Agrarwissenschaftliche Universität, Fakultät für Tierproduktion, H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S u.40. Ungarn
  • Ferenc Bogenfürst Pannon University of Agriculture, Faculty of Animal Science, Institute of Poultry and Small Animal Breeding, H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40. Hungary , Pannon Agrarwissenschaftliche Universität, Fakultät für Tierproduktion, H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S u.40. Ungarn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.1555

Keywords:

geese, behaviour, watering tray type

Abstract

For the development of rearing and laying technologies under intensive conditions the examination of the behaviour of geese is of great importance. Feeding, drinking, resting, preening, playing and social behaviour types were examined with two different watering tray types (free flow and ventile). On comparison of the results obtained with those presented in the literature it could be established that changes in comfort behaviour types in geese in the first 6 weeks are similar to those observed in Pekin, Muscovy and mulard ducks. Differences were found in the frequency of occurrence of the various behavioural forms. The decrease observed in feeding, drinking and playing time and the higher proportion of resting time inform us that activity in geese is lower than in ducks in the first weeks of rearing. In accordance with the results of the experiment it may be suggested that ventile watering trays be used for geese, as is already the practice with ducks. The introduction of this watering method could help to minimise the extent offeed and water wastage, since it induces the feed searching behaviour pattern. Lack of this behaviour, as is common with intensively kept geese, causes boredom resulting in behavioural anomalies.

Author Biography

  • Marcell Molnár, Pannon University of Agriculture, Faculty of Animal Science, Institute of Poultry and Small Animal Breeding, H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S. u. 40. Hungary, Pannon Agrarwissenschaftliche Universität, Fakultät für Tierproduktion, H-7400 Kaposvár, Guba S u.40. Ungarn

    corresponding author
    molnarm@atk.kaposvar.pate.hu

References

Bogenfürst, F. (1992). Lúdtenyésztők kézikönyve. Új Nap Könyvkiadó, Budapest.

Bögre, J., Bogenfürst, F. (1971). A 0–12 hetes növendékludak tollazatának testtájonkénti fejl dése és a fejlődés szakaszos jellege. Baromfiipar, 18(3), 109–111.

Czakó, J. (1985). Etológia kislexikon Natura kiadó, Budapest.

Molnár, M., Molnár, T., Bogenfürst, F. (1998). A lúd néhány viselkedési formájának változása 2-7 hetes korig, intenzív tartási viszonyok között. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 2(1), 49–56.

Reiter, K. (1991). Wie man Futter- und Wasserverluste reduziert. Deutsche Geflügelwirtschaft und Schweineproduktion, 927–930.

Reiter, K., Bessei, W. (1995). Behavioural comparison of Pekin, Muscovy and Mulard duck on the fattening period. Proceedings of 10th European Symposium on waterfowl, Halle, 110–117.

Downloads

Published

1999-07-15

Issue

Section

Section 4 – Waterfowl and Other Small Animal Breeding Science

How to Cite

Molnár, M., & Bogenfürst, F. (1999). Effects of two different watering tray types on the behaviour of geese. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 3(2), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.31914/aak.1555

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2